Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of extensive superficial cancers of the esophagus may progress with high rates of postoperative stenosis, resulting in significantly decreased quality of life. Several therapies are performed to prevent this, but have not yet been compared in a systematic review.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis were performed using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, LILACS, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. Clinical trials and observational studies were searched from March 2014 to February 2015. Search terms included: endoscopy, ESD, esophageal stenosis, and esophageal stricture. Three retrospective and four prospective (three randomized) cohort studies were selected and involved 249 patients with superficial esophageal neoplasia who underwent ESD, at least two-thirds of the circumference. We grouped trials comparing different techniques to prevent esophagus stenosis post-ESD.

Results

We conducted different meta-analyses on randomized clinical trials (RCT), non-RCT, and global analysis. In RCT (three studies, n = 85), the preventive therapy decreased the risk of stenosis (risk difference = −0.36, 95 % CI −0.55 to −0.18, P = 0.0001). Two studies (one randomized and one non-randomized, n = 55) showed that preventative therapy lowered the average number of endoscopy dilatations (mean difference = −8.57, 95 % CI −13.88 to −3.25, P < 0.002). There were no significant differences in the three RCT studies (n = 85) in complication rates between patients with preventative therapy and those without (risk difference = 0.02, 95 % CI −0.09 to 0.14, P = 0.68).

Conclusions

The use of preventive therapy after extensive ESD of the esophagus reduces the risk of stenosis and the number of endoscopic dilatations for resolution of stenosis without increasing the number of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Herszényi L, Tulassay Z (2010) Epidemiology of gastrointestinal and liver tumors. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 14:249–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF (1998) Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 83:2049–2053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuwano H, Nishinuma Y, Ohtsu A, Kato H, Kitagawa Y, Tamai S, Toh Y, Matsubara H (2007) Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus. April 2007 edition: part I. Edited by the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus 5:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Endoscopic Classification Review Group (2005) Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract: update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy 37(6):570–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Participants in the Paris Workshop (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58(6 Suppl):S3–S43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Katada C, Muto M, Manabe T et al (2003) Esophageal stenosis after endoscopic mucosal resection of superficial esophageal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 57:165–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chennat J, Konda VJ, Ross AS et al (2009) Complete Barrett’s eradication endoscopic mucosal resection: an effective treatment modality for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma—an American single-center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 104:2684–2692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Repici A, Hassan C, Carlino A et al (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: result from a prospective western series. Gastrointest Endosc 71:715–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neuhaus H (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the upper gastrointestinal tract: present and future view of Europe. Dig Endosc 21:S4–S6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mori H, Rafiq K, Kobara H, Fujihara S, Nishiyama N, Oryuu M, Suzuki Y, Masaki T (2013) Steroid permeation into the artificial ulcer by combined steroid gel application and balloon dilatation: prevention of esophageal stricture. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28(6):999–1003. doi:10.1111/jgh.12154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K et al (2009) Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 70:860–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Isomoto H, Yamaguchi N, Nakayama T et al (2011) Management of esophageal stricture after complete circular endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol 11:46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. van Vilsteren FG, Pouw RE, Seewald S et al (2011) Stepwise radical endoscopic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for Barrett’s oesophagus with high-grade dysplasia or early cancer: a multicentre randomized trial. Gut 60:765–773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K et al (2009) Predictors of postoperative stricture after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial squamous cell neoplasms. Endoscopy 41:661–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamaguchi N, Isomoto H, Nakayama T et al (2011) Usefulness of oral prednisolone in the treatment of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 73:1115–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, the PRISMA-P Group (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 349:g7647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, 2014

  18. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327(7414):557–560

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Takahashi H, Arimura Y, Okahara S, Kodaira J, Hokari K, Tsukagoshi H, Shinomura Y, Hosokawa M (2015) A randomized controlled trial of endoscopic steroid injection for prophylaxis of esophageal stenoses after extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection. BMC Gastroenterol 15(1):1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sato H, Inoue H, Kobayashi Y, Maselli R, Santi EG, Hayee B, Igarashi K, Yoshida A, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Aoyagi Y, Kudo SE (2013) Control of severe strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal carcinoma: oral steroid therapy with balloon dilation or balloon dilation alone. Gastrointest Endosc 78(2):250–257. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2013.01.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wen J, Lu Z, Yang Y, Liu Q, Yang J, Wang S, Wang X, Du H, Meng J, Wang H, Linghu E (2014) Preventing stricture formation by covered esophageal stent placement after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer. Dig Dis Sci 59(3):658–63. doi:10.1007/s10620-013-2958-5. Erratum in: Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Oct;59(10):2607. Linghu, Enqiang [added]

  22. Uno K, Iijima K, Koike T, Abe Y, Asano N, Ara N, Shimosegawa T (2012) A pilot study of scheduled endoscopic balloon dilation with oral agent tranilast to improve the efficacy of stricture dilation after endoscopic submucosal dissection of the esophagus. J Clin Gastroenterol 46(9):e76–e82. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e31824fff76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hanaoka N, Ishihara R, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Higashino K, Ohta T, Kanzaki H, Hanafusa M, Nagai K, Matsui F, Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Ito Y (2012) Intralesional steroid injection to prevent stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer: a controlled prospective study. Endoscopy 44(11):1007–1011. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1310107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hashimoto S, Kobayashi M, Takeuchi M, Sato Y, Narisawa R, Aoyagi Y (2011) The efficacy of endoscopic triamcinolone injection for the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 74(6):1389–1393. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Toyanaga T, Man IM, East JE et al (2013) 1,635 endoscopic submucosal dissection cases in the esophagus, stomach, and colorectum: complication rates and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:1000–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shimizu Y, Takahashi M, Yoshida T et al (2013) Endoscopic resection (endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal dissection) for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: current status of various techniques. Dig Endosc 25(Suppl. 1):13–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mizuta H, Nishimori I, Kuratani Y, Higashidani Y, Kohsaki T, Onishi S (2009) Predictive factors for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 22(7):626–631. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00954.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang C, Lu X, Chen P (2013) Clinical value of preventive balloon dilatation for esophageal stricture. Exp Ther Med 5(1):292–294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miyashita M, Onda M, Okawa K et al (1997) Endoscopic dexamethasone injection following balloon dilatation of anastomotic stricture after esophagogastrostomy. Am J Surg 174:442–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Werner S, Grose R (2003) Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev 83:835–870

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kochhar R, Makharia GK (2002) Usefulness of intralesional triamcinolone in treatment of benign esophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 56:829–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohki T, Yamato M, Ota M, Takagi R, Murakami D, Kondo M, Sasaki R, Namiki H, Okano T, Yamamoto M (2012) Prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection using tissue-engineered cell sheets. Gastroenterology 143(3):582–588.e1-2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.04.050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Guo HM, Zhang XQ, Chen M, Huang SL, Zou XP (2014) Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 20(18):5540–5547. doi:10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5540 (review)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. F. Oliveira.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

J. F. Oliveira, E.G. H. Moura, W. M. Bernardo, E. Ide, S. Cheng, M. Sulbaran, C. M. L. Santos, and P. Sakai have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliveira, J.F., Moura, E.G.H., Bernardo, W.M. et al. Prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 30, 2779–2791 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4551-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4551-9

Keywords

Navigation