Skip to main content
Log in

Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The choice of surgical technique to extract stones from the common bile duct (CBD) depends on local experience, anatomical characteristics and also on the size, location and number of stones. Most authors consider choledochotomy an alternative to failed transcystic exploration, although some use it exclusively. Although the CBD is traditionally closed with T-tube drainage after choledochotomy, its use is associated with 11.3–27.5 % morbidity. This study examined the efficacy of laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) with primary closure for the treatment of CBD stones using intraoperative cholangiography (IOC).

Methods

Retrospective study of 160 patients who underwent LCBDE with primary closure after choledochotomy between January 2001 and December 2012.

Results

The diagnosis of choledocholithiasis was definitively made in all cases by IOC. The overall complication rate was 15 % and the biliary complication rate was 7.5 %. Bile leakage was reported in 11 patients (6.8 %). In over half the cases (63.6 %), no further action was required and the leak closed spontaneously. Six patients were reoperated (3.75 %), two for bile peritonitis and four for haemoperitoneum. The success rate for stone clearance was 96.2 %. The mortality rate and CBD stricture rate were 0 %.

Conclusion

Primary closure after choledochotomy to clear stones from the CBD is a safe technique that confers excellent results and allows one-stage treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dasari BV, Tan CJ, Gurusamy KS, Martin DJ, Kirk G, McKie L, Diamond T, Taylor MA (2013) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003327

    Google Scholar 

  2. Overby DW, Apelgren KN, Richardson W, Fanelli R (2010) SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery. Surg Endosc 24(10):2368–2386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kroh M, Chand B (2008) Choledocholithiasis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Clin N Am 88(5):1019–1031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lu J, Cheng Y, Xiong XZ, Lin YX, Wu SJ, Cheng NS (2012) Two-stage vs. single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol 18(24):3156

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Clayton ES, Connor S, Alexakis N, Leandros E (2006) Meta-analysis of endoscopy and surgery versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones with the gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 93(10):1185–1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexakis N, Connor S (2012) Meta-analysis of one- vs. two-stage laparoscopic endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. HPB (Oxford) 14(4):254–259. doi:10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, Siperstein AE, Schecter WP, Campbell AR, Mackersie RC, Rodas A, Kreuwel HT, Harris HW (2010) Prospective randomized trial of LC + LCBDE vs. ERCP/S + LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 145(1):28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs. single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13(10):952–957

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bansal VK, Misra MC, Garg P, Prabhu M (2010) A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24(8):1986–1989

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bansal VK, Misra MC, Rajan K, Kilambi R, Kumar S, Krishna A, Kumar A, Pandav CS, Subramaniam R, Arora MK, Garg PK (2014) Single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage endoscopic stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with concomitant gallbladder stones and common bile duct stones: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 28(3):875–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis MP (1998) Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 351(9097):159–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koc B, Karahan S, Adas G, Tutal F, Guven H, Ozsoy A (2013) Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg 206(4):457–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorba Martín R, Ramirez Maldonado E, Fabregat Prous J, Buisac González D, Banqué Navarro M, Gornals Soler J, Busquets Barenys J, Ramos Rubio E, Peláez Serra N, Lladó Garriga L, Rafecas Renau A (2012) Minimising hospital costs in the treatment of bile duct calculi: a comparison study. Cir Esp 90(5):310–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yin Z, Xu K, Sun J, Zhang J, Xiao Z, Wang J, Niu H, Zhao Q, Lin S, Li Y (2013) Is the end of the T-tube drainage era in laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones is coming? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 257(1):54–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Delgado Gomis F, Blanes Masson F, Colomer Beltrán B, Domingo del Pozo C, Gómez Abril S, Serrano Martínez F (1999) Laparoscopic choledochotomy in the management of choledocholithiasis. A report of 32 cases. Rev Esp Enferm 91(3):182–189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Delgado Gomis F, Blanes Masson F, Gómez Abril S, Colomer Beltrán B (2000) Laparoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis. Cir esp 68(4):316–319

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149(5):680–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saharia PC, Zuidema GD, Cameron JL (1977) Primary common duct stones. Ann surg 185(5):598

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Frossard JL, Morel PM (2010) Detection and management of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 72(4):808–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Costi R, Gnocchi A, Di Mario F, Sarli L (2014) Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 20(37):13382–13401

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M (2008) Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 57(7):1004–1021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sirinek KR, Schwesinger WH (2015) Has intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy become obsolete in the era of preoperative endoscopic retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography? J Am Coll Surg 220(4):522–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Horwood J, Akbar F, Davis K, Morgan R (2010) Prospective evaluation of a selective approach to cholangiography for suspected common bile duct stones. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92(3):206–210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamouda AH, Goh W, Mahmud S, Khan M, Nassar AHM (2007) Intraoperative colangiography facilitates simple transcystic clearance of ductal stones in units without expertise for laparoscopic bile duct surgery. Surg Endosc 21:955–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. El Shallaly G, Seow C, Sharp C, Mughrabi A, Nassar AH (2005) Intraoperative cholangiography time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: timing the radiographer. Surg Endosc 19(10):1370–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cai H, Sun D, Sun Y, Bai J, Zhao H, Miao Y (2012) Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy. World J Surg 36(1):164–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vindal A, Chander J, Lal P, Mahendra B (2014) Comparison between intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy for ductal clearance in laparoscopic CBD exploration: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3766-5

    Google Scholar 

  29. Decker G, Borie F, Millat B, Berthou JC, Deleuze A, Drouard F, Guillon F, Rodier JG, Fingerhut A (2003) One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 17(1):12–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Khaled YS, Malde DJ, de Souza C, Kalia A, Ammori BJ (2013) Laparoscopic bile duct exploration via choledochotomy followed by primary duct closure is feasible and safe for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 27(11):4164–4170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Feng Y, Zhu H, Chen X, Xu S, Cheng W, Ni J, Shi R (2012) Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol 47(6):655–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeurnink SM, Poley JW, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD (2008) ERCP as an outpatient treatment: a review. Gastrointest Endosc 68(1):118–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanif F, Ahmed Z, Abdel Samie M, Nassar A (2010) Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 24:1552–1556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Paganini AM, Guerrieri M, Sarnari J, De Sanctis A, D’Ambrosio G, Lezoche G, Perretta S, Lezoche E (2007) Thirteen years experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Effectiveness and long-term results. Surg Endosc 21:34–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gurusamy KS, Koti R, Davidson BR (2013) T-tube drainage versus primary closure after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005641.pub3

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leida Z, Ping B, Shuguang W, Yu H (2008) A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy. Surg Endosc 22(7):1595–1600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors received no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuria Estellés Vidagany.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Estellés Vidagany N, Domingo Del Pozo C, Peris Tomás N, Diez Ares J, Vázquez Tarragón A, Blanes Masson F have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Estellés Vidagany, N., Domingo del Pozo, C., Peris Tomás, N. et al. Eleven years of primary closure of common bile duct after choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 30, 1975–1982 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4424-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4424-2

Keywords

Navigation