Abstract
Introduction
To reduce costs, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented new policies governing which patients are automatically admitted as inpatients (staying greater than “two midnights”) and which require additional justification with physician documentation to be admitted. This study examines procedures missing from the Medicare Inpatient Only (MIO) list and uses national data to evaluate its appropriateness.
Methods
Non-MIO procedures were identified from the current MIO list. Utilizing relevant billing codes, procedures were queried in the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database for length of stay (LOS), percentage requiring >2 day stay, and inpatient status from 2005 to 2012. In addition, a separate analysis was performed for patients 65 years old or older who would qualify for Medicare.
Results
A majority of patients stayed more than 2 days for several procedures not included on the MIO list (% staying >2 days, mean LOS), including component separation (79.1 %, 5.9 ± 12.3 days), diagnostic laparoscopy (64.2 %, 5.5 ± 11.9 days), laparoscopic splenectomy (60.0 %, 9.0 ± 13.6 days), open recurrent ventral hernia repair (58.2 %, 6.3 ± 9.0 days), laparoscopic esophageal surgery (46.4 %, 5.3 ± 13.3 days), and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (24.7 %, 2.5 ± 8.8 days). In patients ≥65 years, the average LOS was longer than the general population; for example, 40.2 % of laparoscopic appendectomies and 38.7 % of laparoscopic cholecystectomies in this older group required more than two nights in the hospital. In 92.3 % of procedures examined, patients ≥65 years required greater than two nights in the hospital with an average LOS of 2.5–10.7 days.
Conclusion
Commonly encountered non-MIO surgical procedures have national precedents for inpatient status. Before enacting policy, CMS and other regulatory bodies should consider current data to ensure rules are evidence-based and applicable.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Health, United States (2009) With chartbook on trends in the health of Americans (2010). National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville
Schneider EL, Guralnik JM (1990) The aging of America. Impact on health care costs. JAMA 263(17):2335–2340
The Board of Trustees, Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds 2012 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services frequently asked questions—two midnight inpatient admission guidance and patient status reviews for admissions On Or After October 1, 2013. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Monitoring-Programs/Medical-Review/Downloads/QAsforWebsitePosting_110413-v2-CLEAN.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
Sheehy AM, Graf BK, Gangireddy S, Formisano R, Jacobs EA (2013) “Observation status” for hospitalized patients: implications of a proposed Medicare rules change. JAMA Intern Med 173(21):2004–2006. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9382
Ollapally VM (2013) The inpatient list. Bull Am Coll Surg 98(6):54–55
Final Changes to the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System and CY 2008 Payment Rates–Addendum E (2008). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Electronic publication
User Guide for the Participate Use of Data File—American College Of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program. (2007). http://www.acsnsqip.org Accessed Nov 2014
American Medical Association (AMA) and American Hospital Association (AHA) Letter to Marilyn B. Tavenner, Administrator, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. American Medical Assocation (AMA) and American Hospital Association (AHA), American Hospital Association website
Pendleton A (2014) Two midnight rule update: the controversy continues. Healthc Financ
Jaffe S (2014) Fighting ‘Observation’ status. New York Times
Center for Medicare Advocacy (2011) Richard Bagnall et al vs. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services. Class Action Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive, and Mandamus Relief
Center For Medicare Advocacy (2014) Self Help Packet For Medicare “Observation Status”
Silver BC (2014) Re-thinking the ‘two-midnight’ rule: the challenge of regulating hospital admission. R I Med J 97(9):13–15
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (2014) Inpatient hospital reviews: settlements updated 11/25/2014. http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Monitoring-Programs/Medicare-FFS-Compliance-Programs/Medical-Review/InpatientHospitalReviews.html. Accessed 12 Jan 2015
Sheehy AM, Graf B, Gangireddy S et al (2013) Hospitalized but not admitted: characteristics of patients with “observation status” at an academic medical center. JAMA Intern Med 173(21):1991–1998. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8185
Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJHM (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD007635. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2
Disclosures
Drs. Huntington, Blair, Cox, Kercher, Augenstein, Heniford, and Ms. Prasad have no personal or financial conflicts of interest to disclose relevant to this manuscript or its data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huntington, C.R., Blair, L.J., Cox, T.C. et al. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) two midnight rule: policy at odds with reality. Surg Endosc 30, 751–755 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4271-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4271-1