Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Face, content, and construct validity of four, inanimate training exercises using the da Vinci ® Si surgical system configured with Single-Site instrumentation

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Validated training exercises are essential tools for surgeons as they develop technical skills to use robot-assisted minimally invasive surgical systems. The purpose of this study was to show face, content, and construct validity of four, inanimate training exercises using the da Vinci ® Si surgical system configured with Single-Site instrumentation.

Methods

New (N = 21) and experienced (N = 6) surgeons participated in the study. New surgeons (11 Gynecology [GYN] and 10 General Surgery [GEN]) had not completed any da Vinci Single-Site cases but may have completed multiport cases using the da Vinci system. They participated in this study prior to attending a certification course focused on da Vinci Single-Site instrumentation. Experienced surgeons (5 GYN and 1 GEN) had completed at least 25 da Vinci Single-Site cases. The surgeons completed four inanimate training exercises and then rated them with a questionnaire. Raw metrics and overall normalized scores were computed using both video recordings and kinematic data collected from the surgical system.

Results

The experienced surgeons significantly outperformed new surgeons for many raw metrics and the overall normalized scores derived from video review (p < 0.05). Only one exercise did not achieve a significant difference between new and experienced surgeons (p = 0.08) when calculating an overall normalized score using both video and advanced metrics derived from kinematic data. Both new and experienced surgeons rated the training exercises as appearing, to train and measure technical skills used during da Vinci Single-Site surgery and actually testing the technical skills used during da Vinci Single-Site surgery.

Conclusions

In summary, the four training exercises showed face, content, and construct validity. Improved overall scores could be developed using additional metrics not included in this study. The results suggest that the training exercises could be used in an overall training curriculum aimed at developing proficiency in technical skills for surgeons new to da Vinci Single-Site instrumentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haber G-P et al (2010) Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology 76(6):1279–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kroh M et al (2011) First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc 25(11):3566–3573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. http://intuitivesurgical.com/products/davinci_surgical_system/da-vinci-single-site/#sthash.GSA9056f.dpuf. Accessed 17 Jul 2014

  4. Finnegan KT et al (2012) da Vinci Skills Simulator construct validation study: correlation of prior robotic experience with overall score and time score simulator performance. Urology 80(2):330–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hung AJ et al (2012) Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. The Journal of urology 187(2):630–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hung AJ et al (2011) Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. J Urol 186(3):1019–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly DC et al (2012) Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Urology 79(5):1068–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McDougall EM (2007) Validation of surgical simulators. J Endourol 21(3):244–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Green I et al (2013) Creating a validated robotic curriculum for resident and fellow education. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20(6):S130–S130

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jarc AM, Curet M (2014) Construct validity of nine new inanimate exercises for robotic surgeon training using a standardized setup. Surg Endosc 28(2):648–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith R, Patel V, Satava R (2013) Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14‐society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development. Int J Med Robot 10(3):379–384

  12. Aghazadeh M et al (2014) Multi-institutional validation of fundamental inanimate robotic skills tasks (FIRST). J Urol 191(4 Supplement):e130–e131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dulan G et al (2012) Proficiency-based training for robotic surgery: construct validity, workload, and expert levels for nine inanimate exercises. Surg Endosc 26(6):1516–1521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DiMaio S, Hasser C (2008) The da Vinci research interface in MICCAI workshop on systems and architectures for computer assisted interventions, MIDAS J. http://hdl.handle.net/10380/1464

  15. Rosen J. et al. The BlueDRAGON-a system for measuring the kinematics and dynamics of minimally invasive surgical tools in vivo in Robotics and Automation, 2002. Proceedings. ICRA’02. IEEE International Conference on 2002: IEEE

  16. Ruda K et al (2013) SurgTrak—a universal platform for quantitative surgical data capture. J Med Devices 7(3):030923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramos P et al (2013) Validation of dry lab exercises for robotic training using global assessment tool. J Urol 189(4):e642

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

A. M. Jarc is a researcher in the Medical Research group at Intuitive Surgical Inc. M. Curet is a Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer at Intuitive Surgical Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony M. Jarc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jarc, A.M., Curet, M. Face, content, and construct validity of four, inanimate training exercises using the da Vinci ® Si surgical system configured with Single-Site instrumentation. Surg Endosc 29, 2298–2304 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3947-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3947-2

Keywords

Navigation