Abstract
Background
Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is a new procedure for the treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. The aim of the study was to review the clinical outcomes of ERAT and further examine its effectiveness and safety.
Methods
The study was performed on patients who underwent ERAT for acute uncomplicated appendicitis at three tertiary hospitals in China from December 2009 to May 2013. Patient demographics, technique aspects of the ERAT procedures, clinical success (resolution of symptoms and normalization of laboratory tests), time until resumption of diet, and hospital stay were analyzed, and complications and recurrence were followed up.
Results
Forty-one patients were entered, among which 34 patients were definitely diagnosed as having acute uncomplicated appendicitis; in 7 patients, acute appendicitis was excluded by endoscopic retrograde appendicography. Thirty-three patients completed ERAT except one patient who failed appendiceal cannulation. Abdominal pain resolved immediately in 32 patients, and clinical success rate was 97 %. There was one failure case (3 %) that complicated perforation after 48 h received emergency appendectomy. The median follow-up period was 12 months (IQR = 9–23 months). During follow-up, there were no long-term complication; 2 patients (6.2 %) had recurrent abdominal pain and received appendectomy (one had a histologically normal appendix).
Conclusions
ERAT is an effective method to diagnose and treat acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Multicenter prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm its utility and place in the management of suspected acute appendicitis
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fleming FJ, Kim MJ, Messing S, Gunzler D, Salloum R, Monson JR (2010) Balancing the risk of postoperative surgical infections. Ann Surg 252:895–900
Andersson RE (2001) Small bowel obstruction after appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:1387–1391
Tingstedt B, Johansson J, Nehez L, Andersson R (2004) Late abdomianl complaints after appendectomy-readmissions during long-term follow-up. Dig Surg 21:23–27
Myers E, Kavanagh DO, Ghous H, Evoy D, McDermott EW (2009) The impact of evolving management strategies on negative appendicectomy rate. Colorectal Dis 12:817–821
Seetahal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC, Oyetunji TA, Greene WR, Frederick W, Cornwell EE, Chang DC, Siram SM (2011) Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J Surg 201:433–437
Lu CL, Liu CC, Fuh JL, Liu PY, Wu CW, Chang FY, Lee SD (2007) Irritable bowel syndrome and negative appendectomy: a prospective multivariable investigation. Gut 56:655–660
Andreu-Ballester JC, Pérez-Griera J, Ballester F, Colomer-Rubio E, Ortiz-Tarín I, Peñarroja Otero C (2007) Secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) deficiency inserum of patients with GALTectomy (appendectomy and tonsillectomy). Clin Immunol 123:289–297
Randal Bollinger R, Barbas AS, Bush EL, Lin SS, Parker W (2007) Biofilms in the large bowel suggest an apparent function of the human vermiform appendix. J Theor Biol 249:826–831
Liu BR, Song JT, Han FY, Li H, Yin JB (2012) Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: a pilot minimally invasive technique (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 76:862–866
Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW, Thiessen MEW, Weingart SD, Decker WW (2010) Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 55:71–116
Said M, Ledochowski M, Dietze O, Simader H (1995) Colonoscopic diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:569–571
Liu CH, Tsai FC, Hsu SJ, Yang PM (2006) Successful colonoscopic drainage of appendiceal pus in acute appendicitis. Gastrointest Endosc 64:1011–1012
Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, Leconte M, Costaglioli B, Karoui M, Alves A, Dousset B, Valleur P, Falissard B, Franco D (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579
Gurleyik G, Gurleyik E (2003) Age-related clinical features in older patients with acute appendicitis. Eur J Emerg Med 10:200–203
Prystowsky JB, Pugh CM, Nagle AP (2005) Appendicitis. Curr Probl Surg 42:688–742
Hansson J, Korner U, Khorram-Manesh A, Solberg A, Lundholm K (2009) Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapyversusappendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 5:473–481
Acknowledgments
We express our gratitude to Professor David Y. Graham and Lovedip S. Kooner for their assistance in revising the manuscript.
Disclosures
Bing-Rong Liu, Xiao Ma, Jia Feng, Zhuo Yang, Bo Qu, Zi-Tan Feng, Shu-Ren Ma, Ji-Bin Yin, Rong Sun, Li–Li Guo, Wen-Ge Liu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Bing-Rong Liu contributed equally with Xiao Ma and is the co-first author for this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, BR., Ma, X., Feng, J. et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) : a multicenter retrospective study in China. Surg Endosc 29, 905–909 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3750-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3750-0