Skip to main content
Log in

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) : a multicenter retrospective study in China

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is a new procedure for the treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. The aim of the study was to review the clinical outcomes of ERAT and further examine its effectiveness and safety.

Methods

The study was performed on patients who underwent ERAT for acute uncomplicated appendicitis at three tertiary hospitals in China from December 2009 to May 2013. Patient demographics, technique aspects of the ERAT procedures, clinical success (resolution of symptoms and normalization of laboratory tests), time until resumption of diet, and hospital stay were analyzed, and complications and recurrence were followed up.

Results

Forty-one patients were entered, among which 34 patients were definitely diagnosed as having acute uncomplicated appendicitis; in 7 patients, acute appendicitis was excluded by endoscopic retrograde appendicography. Thirty-three patients completed ERAT except one patient who failed appendiceal cannulation. Abdominal pain resolved immediately in 32 patients, and clinical success rate was 97 %. There was one failure case (3 %) that complicated perforation after 48 h received emergency appendectomy. The median follow-up period was 12 months (IQR = 9–23 months). During follow-up, there were no long-term complication; 2 patients (6.2 %) had recurrent abdominal pain and received appendectomy (one had a histologically normal appendix).

Conclusions

ERAT is an effective method to diagnose and treat acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Multicenter prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm its utility and place in the management of suspected acute appendicitis

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fleming FJ, Kim MJ, Messing S, Gunzler D, Salloum R, Monson JR (2010) Balancing the risk of postoperative surgical infections. Ann Surg 252:895–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson RE (2001) Small bowel obstruction after appendicectomy. Br J Surg 88:1387–1391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tingstedt B, Johansson J, Nehez L, Andersson R (2004) Late abdomianl complaints after appendectomy-readmissions during long-term follow-up. Dig Surg 21:23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Myers E, Kavanagh DO, Ghous H, Evoy D, McDermott EW (2009) The impact of evolving management strategies on negative appendicectomy rate. Colorectal Dis 12:817–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Seetahal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC, Oyetunji TA, Greene WR, Frederick W, Cornwell EE, Chang DC, Siram SM (2011) Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J Surg 201:433–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu CL, Liu CC, Fuh JL, Liu PY, Wu CW, Chang FY, Lee SD (2007) Irritable bowel syndrome and negative appendectomy: a prospective multivariable investigation. Gut 56:655–660

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Andreu-Ballester JC, Pérez-Griera J, Ballester F, Colomer-Rubio E, Ortiz-Tarín I, Peñarroja Otero C (2007) Secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) deficiency inserum of patients with GALTectomy (appendectomy and tonsillectomy). Clin Immunol 123:289–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Randal Bollinger R, Barbas AS, Bush EL, Lin SS, Parker W (2007) Biofilms in the large bowel suggest an apparent function of the human vermiform appendix. J Theor Biol 249:826–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu BR, Song JT, Han FY, Li H, Yin JB (2012) Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: a pilot minimally invasive technique (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 76:862–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Howell JM, Eddy OL, Lukens TW, Thiessen MEW, Weingart SD, Decker WW (2010) Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 55:71–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Said M, Ledochowski M, Dietze O, Simader H (1995) Colonoscopic diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:569–571

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu CH, Tsai FC, Hsu SJ, Yang PM (2006) Successful colonoscopic drainage of appendiceal pus in acute appendicitis. Gastrointest Endosc 64:1011–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, Leconte M, Costaglioli B, Karoui M, Alves A, Dousset B, Valleur P, Falissard B, Franco D (2011) Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:1573–1579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gurleyik G, Gurleyik E (2003) Age-related clinical features in older patients with acute appendicitis. Eur J Emerg Med 10:200–203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prystowsky JB, Pugh CM, Nagle AP (2005) Appendicitis. Curr Probl Surg 42:688–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansson J, Korner U, Khorram-Manesh A, Solberg A, Lundholm K (2009) Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapyversusappendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg 5:473–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to Professor David Y. Graham and Lovedip S. Kooner for their assistance in revising the manuscript.

Disclosures

Bing-Rong Liu, Xiao Ma, Jia Feng, Zhuo Yang, Bo Qu, Zi-Tan Feng, Shu-Ren Ma, Ji-Bin Yin, Rong Sun, Li–Li Guo, Wen-Ge Liu have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing-Rong Liu.

Additional information

Bing-Rong Liu contributed equally with Xiao Ma and is the co-first author for this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, BR., Ma, X., Feng, J. et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) : a multicenter retrospective study in China. Surg Endosc 29, 905–909 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3750-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3750-0

Keywords

Navigation