Skip to main content
Log in

Is next-day discharge following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safe in select patients? Analysis of short-term outcomes

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is controversy surrounding the safety and feasibility of next-day discharge following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for morbid obesity. The objective of this study was to determine if next-day discharge following LRYGB is comparable to standard discharge (i.e. postoperative day two) with respect to 30-day patient outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed using data from the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgery Quality Improvement Program participant use files. The study population consisted of patients discharged on either postoperative day (POD) 1 or 2 that underwent an elective LRYGB for morbid obesity between 2005 and 2012. Patients were excluded if they had recent surgery, any relative contraindication to bariatric surgery, or any recorded complication/death during their principal admission. The primary outcome was 30-day overall complications and secondary outcomes were 30-day major complications and reoperations. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate each outcome based on discharge day.

Results

The study population consisted of 6,166 and 30,966 patients discharged on POD 1 and 2, respectively. No major clinical differences were found between the two groups with respect to relevant patient and operative characteristics. After adjustment, the odds ratios for 30-day overall complications, major complications, and reoperations with next-day discharge were 0.98 (p = 0.870, 95 % CI [0.81–1.19]), 0.81 (p = 0.204, 95 % CI [0.58–1.12]) and 1.06 (p = 0.717, 95 % CI [0.79–1.41]), respectively. Body mass index ≥50, operative time ≥3 h, diabetes, dyspnea and hypertension were significant predictors for complications in patients discharged the next day.

Conclusions

Using this large national surgical database, LRYGB patients discharged on POD 1 did not have a significantly higher rate of adverse events compared to patients discharged on POD 2. Understanding the important predictors of adverse events following LRYGB will help bariatric surgeons implement next-day discharge protocols based on the appropriate perioperative evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mccarty TM, Arnold DT, Lamont JP, Fisher TL, Kuhn JA (2005) Optimizing outcomes in bariatric surgery: outpatient laparoscopic gastric bypass. Ann Surg 242(4):494–501

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hollenbeak CS, Rogers AM, Barrus B, Wadiwala I, Cooney RN (2008) Surgical volume impacts bariatric surgery mortality: a case for centers of excellence. Surgery 144(5):736–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuggle KR, Duncan TD, Hobson LL, Carr A, Sans K (2011) Is 23 hour observation for gastric bypass surgery safe? Obesity Surgery. In: Conference: 16th congress of the international federation for the surgery of obesity and metabolic disorders, IFSO 2011 Hamburg, Germany vol 21, issue 8, p 1103

  4. Sasse KC, Ganser JH, Kozar MD, Watson RW, Lim DC, Mcginley L, Smith CJ, Bovee V, Beh J (2009) Outpatient weight loss surgery: initiating a gastric bypass and gastric banding ambulatory weight loss surgery center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13(1):50–55

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas H, Agrawal S (2011) Systematic review of 23-h (outpatient) stay laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21(8):677–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fares LG, Reeder RC, Bock J, Batezel V (2008) 23-h stay outcomes for laparoscopic roux-en-y gastric bypass in a small, teaching community hospital. Am Surg 74(12):1206–1210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morton JM, Winegar D, Blackstone R, Wolfe B (2014) Is ambulatory laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass associated with higher adverse events? Ann Surg 259(2):286–292

  8. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J (2007) The patient safety in surgery study: background, study design, and patient populations. J Am Coll Surg 204(6):1089–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):315–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Daley J, Khuri SF, Henderson W (1997) Risk adjustment of the postoperative morbidity rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):328–340

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daley J, Forbes MG, Young GJ (1997) Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure National VA Surgical Risk Study. J Am Coll Surg 185(4):341–351

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khuri SF, Henderson WG, Daley J (2008) Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the patient safety in surgery study. Ann Surg 248(2):329–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Finks J, Dimick J, English W, Carlin A, Hawasli A, Wood M, Genaw J, Share D, Birkmeyer J, Birkmeyer NJ (2012) Effects of early discharge on morbidity, mortality, ED visits and readmissions following laparoscopic gastric bypass: results from the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative.In: 29th annual meeting of the American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery (ASMBS 2012), San Diego. Plenary Session Abstract PL-132

  14. Courcoulas A, Schuchert M, Gatti G, Luketich J (2003) The relationship of surgeon and hospital volume to outcome after gastric bypass surgery in pennsylvania: a 3-year summary. Surgery 134(4):613–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dos santos M, Madalosso CA, Palma LA, Da silva Fornari AC, Do Socorro D, Scherer T, Gurski RR, Fornari F (2009) Hospital discharge in the day following open roux-en-y gastric bypass: is it feasible and safe? Obes Surg 19(3):281–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madan AK, Speck KE, Ternovits CA, Tichansky DS (2006) Outcome of a clinical pathway for discharge within 48 h after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Am J Surg 192(3):399–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muller MK, Dedes KJ, Dindo D, Steiner S, Hahnloser D, Clavien PA (2009) Impact of clinical pathways in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394(1):31–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ronellenfitsch U, Schwarzbach M, Kring A, Kienle P, Post S, Hasenberg T (2012) The effect of clinical pathways for bariatric surgery on perioperative quality of care. Obes Surg 22(5):732–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lancaster RT, Hutter MM (2008) Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data. Surg Endosc 22(12):256–2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP are the source of the data used herein.

Disclosures

There are no conflicts of interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Elnahas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elnahas, A., Urbach, D., Okrainec, A. et al. Is next-day discharge following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass safe in select patients? Analysis of short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 28, 2789–2794 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3546-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3546-2

Keywords

Navigation