Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neuro-anatomy of the posterior parametrium and surgical considerations for a nerve-sparing approach in radical pelvic surgery

  • Technique
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Efforts to improve approaches to the so called “parametrium” with minimally invasive and less dangerous techniques have led to a better study of the anatomic location and composition of that region. Nevertheless, many misconceptions and confusions about the anatomy of the posterior parametrium and its structures still remain. This study aimed to review anatomic and surgical data and to identify several clear landmarks and surgical steps for a nerve-sparing approach to posterior parametrectomy in the course of radical pelvic surgery with or without rectal resection.

Methods

The literature and anatomic dissections of fresh, embalmed, and formalin-fixed female pelvis cadavers were reviewed. The authors’ laparotomic and laparoscopic case series also was reviewed for deep-infiltrating endometriosis as well as uterine, ovarian, and rectal cancer.

Results

The anatomic entity commonly termed the “posterior parametrium” can be identified as the conjunction of three important anatomic structures (ligaments): the cranial structure (uterosacral ligaments), the caudad structure (rectovaginal ligaments), and the laterocaudad structure (lateral rectal ligaments). Identification of these structures (containing autonomic innervations for pelvic viscera) may allow an accurate nerve-sparing surgical approach in many radical pelvic operations.

Conclusions

The incidences of urinary, rectal, and sexual morbidity after radical pelvic surgical procedures for oncologic diseases (rectal/ovarian cancer, advanced endometrial/cervical cancer, posterior pelvic recurrences) and deep severe endometriosis can be reduced by better knowing and dissecting the right embryo-anatomic planes of the so-called “posterior parametrium.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen DR, Heald RJ (1983) Rectocolectomy with anal conservation in inflammatory colitis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 65:347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ercoli A, Delmas V, Gadonneix P, Fanfani F, Villet R, Paparella P, Mancuso S, Scambia G (2003) Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat 25:200–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ercoli A, Delmas V, Fanfani F, Gadonneix P, Ceccaroni M, Fagotti A, Mancuso S, Scambia G (2005) Terminologia Anatomica versus unofficial descriptions and nomenclature of the fasciae and ligaments of the female pelvis: a dissection-based comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1565–1573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. García-Granero E (2010) Assessment of the quality of bowel cancer surgery: “from the mesorectum to the mesocolon.”. Cir Esp 87:131–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goligher JC (1986) Extended low anterior resection with stapled colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 75:82–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heald RJ, Ryall R (1982) Recurrent cancer after restorative resection of the rectum. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 284:826–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang GJ, Gao CF, Wei D, Wang C, Meng WJ (2010) Anatomy of the lateral ligaments of the rectum: a controversial point of view. World J Gastroenterol 16:5411–5415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yabuki Y, Asamoto A, Hoshiba T, Nishimoto H, Nishikawa Y, Nakajima T (2000) Radical hysterectomy: an anatomic evaluation of parametrial dissection. Gynecol Oncol 77:155–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Querleu D, Morrow CP (2008) Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol 9:297–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Havenga K, DeRuiter MC, Enker WE, Welvaart K (1996) Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:384–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ceccaroni M, Pontrelli G, Spagnolo E, Bruni F, Scioscia M, Paglia A, Minelli L (2010) Parametrial dissection during laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a new approach aims to improve patients’ postoperative quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202(3):320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ceccaroni M, Fanfani F, Ercoli A, Scambia G (2006) Innervazione viscerale e somatica della pelvi femminile. Testo-Atlante di anatomia chirurgica. CIC editore

  14. Heald RJ (1988) The “holy plane” of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Bruni F, D’Urso E, Gagliardi ML, Roviglione G, Minelli L, Ruffo G (2012) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method: a single-center, prospective, clinical trial. Surg Endosc 26:2029–2045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barabouti DG, Wong WD (2005) Current management of rectal cancer: total mesorectal excision (nerve sparing) technique and clinical outcome. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 14:137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R, Barret E, Rozet F, Galiano M, Benoist N, Stakhovsky O, Vallancien G (2010) Radical prostatectomy: evolution of surgical technique from the laparoscopic point of view. Int Braz J Urol 36:129–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Alboni C, Ruffo G, Bruni F, Roviglione G, Scioscia M, Peters I, De Placido G, Minelli L (2010) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing transperitoneal approach for endometriosis infiltrating the pelvic wall and somatic nerves: anatomical considerations and surgical technique. Surg Radiol Anat 32:601–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G, Bruni F, Ruffo G, Peters I, De Placido G, Minelli L (2010) Deep rectal and parametrial infiltrating endometriosis with monolateral pudendal nerve involvement: case report and laparoscopic nerve-sparing approach. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 153:227–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ceccaroni M, Pontrelli G, Scioscia M, Ruffo G, Bruni F, Minelli L (2010) Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical excision of deep endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:14–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujii S (2008) Anatomic identification of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a step-by-step procedure. Gynecol Oncol 111(2 Suppl):S33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kavallaris A, Banz C, Chalvatzas N, Hornemann A, Luedders D, Diedrich K, Bohlmann M (2010) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing surgery of deep infiltrating endometriosis: description of the technique and patients’ outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 248(1):131–135

    Google Scholar 

  23. Landi S, Ceccaroni M, Perutelli A, Allodi C, Barbieri F, Fiaccavento A, Ruffo G, McVeigh E, Zanolla L, Minelli L (2006) Laparoscopic nerve-sparing complete excision of deep endometriosis: is it feasible? Hum Reprod 21:774–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC, Peters AA, Kenter GG (2001) A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in Western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11:180–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Cosma S, Pesci A, Pontrelli G, Minelli L (2011) Cyclic sciatica in a patient with deep monolateral endometriosis infiltrating the right sciatic nerve. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:474–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Ruffo G, Ceccaroni M, Scambia G, Minelli L (2010) Discoid or segmental rectosigmoid resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a case–control study. Fertil Steril 94:444–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Landi S, Mereu L, Indraccolo U, Favero R, Fiaccavento A, Zaccoletti R, Clarizia R, Barbieri F (2009) Laparoscopic excision of endometriosis may require unilateral parametrectomy. JSLS 13:496–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mereu L, Ruffo G, Landi S, Barbieri F, Zaccoletti R, Fiaccavento A, Stepniewska A, Pontrelli G, Minelli L (2009) Laparoscopic treatment of deep endometriosis with segmental colorectal resection: short term morbidity. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Minelli L, Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Ruffo G, Ceccaroni M, Mereu L, Landi S, Pomini P, Scambia G (2009) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for bowel endometriosis: feasibility, complications, and clinical outcome. Arch Surg 144:234–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ruffo G, Scopelliti F, Scioscia M, Ceccaroni M, Mainardi P, Minelli L (2010) Laparoscopic colorectal resection for deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of 436 cases. Surg Endosc 24:63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stepniewska A, Pomini P, Bruni F, Mereu L, Ruffo G, Ceccaroni M, Scioscia M, Guerriero M, Minelli L (2009) Laparoscopic treatment of bowel endometriosis in infertile women. Hum Reprod 24:1619–1625

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Havenga K, Enker WE (2002) Autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision. Surg Clin North Am 82:1009–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Havenga K, Grossmann I, DeRuiter M, Wiggers T (2007) Definition of total mesorectal excision, including the perineal phase: technical considerations. Dig Dis 25:44–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Waldeyer W (1899) Das Becken. Cohen, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  35. Enker WE, Havenga K, Polyak T, Thaler H, Cranor M (1997) Abdominoperineal resection via total mesorectal excision and autonomic nerve preservation for low rectal cancer. World J Surg 21:715–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kato T, Murakami G, Yabuki Y (2002) Does the cardinal ligament of the uterus contain a nerve that should be preserved in radical hysterectomy? Anat Sci Int 77:161–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kato K, Suzuka K, Osaki T, Tanaka N (2007) Unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique to preserve the pelvic autonomic nerves while increasing radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:1172–1178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Okabayashi H (1921) Radical abdominal hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix uteri: modification of the Takayama operation. Surg Gynecol Obstet 33:335–341

    Google Scholar 

  39. Peham HV, Amreich J (1930) Gynecologic operations (in German). Karger, Berlin, pp 350–385

    Google Scholar 

  40. Possover M, Baekelandt J, Flaskamp C, Li D, Chiantera V (2007) Laparoscopic neurolysis of the sacral plexus and the sciatic nerve for extensive endometriosis of the pelvic wall. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 50:33–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Possover M (2009) Laparoscopic management of endopelvic etiologies of pudendal pain in 134 consecutive patients. J Urol 181:1732–1736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW, Henningson L, Steineck G (1999) Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340:1383–1389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Professor Luciano Bovicelli from Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the University of Bologna, School of Medicine for his human example as well as his precious assistance and support in the surgical study design and in supervision of the manuscript writing. This report is dedicated with love to his memory. We gratefully acknowledge Mr. Adolfo Bigioni for his accomplished anatomic illustrations.

Disclosures

Marcello Ceccaroni, Roberto Clarizia, Giovanni Roviglione, and Giacomo Ruffo have no conflicts of interests or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcello Ceccaroni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ceccaroni, M., Clarizia, R., Roviglione, G. et al. Neuro-anatomy of the posterior parametrium and surgical considerations for a nerve-sparing approach in radical pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc 27, 4386–4394 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3043-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3043-z

Keywords

Navigation