Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic resection of paraaortic or paracaval lesions: feasibility and outcome

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection of paraaortic and paracaval lymph nodes is used to stage nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Primary tumors can arise from the retroperitoneum, and tumors from nonurologic malignancy also may metastasize to retroperitoneal lymph nodes. This study aimed to describe the authors’ experience with laparoscopic resection of these lesions.

Methods

A consecutive series of patients between January 2007 and June 2011 with paraaortic, aortocaval, or paracaval tumors with a maximum diameter smaller than 10 cm and confined to the abdomen were considered for laparoscopic resection. Data were collected on size and pathology of the lesions, anesthesia time, postoperative stay, and postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Results

In this study, 25 patients with a median age of 49 years were assessed for laparoscopic resection. Eight patients were considered unsuitable for a laparoscopic approach because of tumor location (n = 5), previous retroperitoneal surgery (n = 1), stoma (n = 1), or lesion not clearly visible on computed tomography (n = 1). Of the 17 patients undergoing laparoscopic resection, 1 was found to have diffuse peritoneal disease at laparoscopy, whereas another was converted to an open procedure due to bleeding. All the laparoscopic patients had an R0 resection. The median hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (2 days) than in the open group (6 days) (P = 0.009). One patient in the laparoscopic group with a functioning paraganglioma and advanced cardiac disease died on postoperative day 7.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic paraaortic and paracaval surgery for primary and recurrent tumors of the retroperitoneum is feasible, with clear resection margin rates similar to that observed for open surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rukstalis DB, Chodak GW (1992) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in a patient with stage 1 testicular carcinoma. J Urol 148:1907–1909 discussion 1909–1910

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rassweiler JJ, Scheitlin W, Heidenreich A, Laguna MP, Janetschek G (2008) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: does it still have a role in the management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous testis cancer? A European perspective. Eur Urol 54:1004–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MacKay G, Ihedioha U, McConnachie A, Serpell M, Molloy RG, O’Dwyer PJ (2007) Laparoscopic colonic resection in fast-track patients does not enhance short-term recovery after elective surgery. Colorectal Dis 9:368–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Parnaby CN, Chong PS, Chisholm L, Farrow J, Connell JM, O’Dwyer PJ (2008) The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours of 6 cm or greater. Surg Endosc 22:617–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahn KSMD, Han H-SMDP, Yoon Y-SMDP, Kim H-HMDP, Lee T-SMDP, Kang S-BMDP et al (2011) Laparoscopic resection of nonadrenal retroperitoneal tumors. Arch Surg 146:162–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Walz MK, Alesina PF, Wenger FA, Koch JA, Neumann HP, Petersenn S et al (2006) Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic treatment of pheochromocytomas and retroperitoneal paragangliomas: results of 161 tumors in 126 patients. World J Surg 30:899–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasza J, Brody FJ, Khambaty F, Vaziri K, Wallace B (2010) Laparoscopic resection of a retroperitoneal cystic lymphangioma in an adult. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:e114–e116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorgun M, Sezer TO, Kirdok O (2010) Laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal schwannoma near the inferior vena. Ann Vasc Surg 24(551):e551–e554

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sasaki A, Suto T, Nitta H, Shimooki O, Obuchi T, Wakabayashi G (2010) Laparoscopic excision of retroperitoneal tumors: report of three cases. Surg Today 40:176–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Misra MC, Bhattacharjee HK, Hemal AK, Bansal VK (2010) Laparoscopic management of rare retroperitoneal tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:e117–e122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Lucia Chung and Patrick J. O’Dwyer have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick J. O’Dwyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chung, L., O’Dwyer, P.J. Laparoscopic resection of paraaortic or paracaval lesions: feasibility and outcome. Surg Endosc 27, 4153–4156 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3013-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3013-5

Keywords

Navigation