Skip to main content
Log in

Total laparoscopic esophageal bypass using a colonic conduit for corrosive-induced esophageal stricture

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The colon and the stomach are the most commonly used conduits for esophageal replacement in patients with esophageal strictures resulting from corrosive ingestion. The replacement surgeries have traditionally been performed by an open approach. While laparoscopic replacement surgery using a stomach conduit has been previously reported, a total laparoscopic bypass using a colonic conduit has not been previously described. We herein describe the surgical technique and results of laparoscopic esophageal bypass using a colonic conduit.

Methods

Patients with corrosive stricture involving the esophagus with the proximal level at the hypopharynx, or those with concomitant gastric scarring, were selected. The surgery was performed with the patient in a supine position using five abdominal ports and a hockey stick/transverse skin crease neck incision. The main steps include colonic mobilization and assessment of the adequacy of the marginal vascular arcade, creation of a retrosternal tunnel, preparation of the colonic conduit, neck dissection, delivery of the colonic conduit into the neck and cervical pharyngo/esophagocolic anastomosis, and intra-abdominal cologastric and ileocolic anastomosis.

Results

During the study period, 39 patients with corrosive stricture of the esophagus were managed surgically at our center with either gastric or colonic bypass. Of these, 22 patients underwent an open procedure (12 retrosternal colonic bypasses and 10 retrosternal gastric bypasses) and 17 patients underwent a laparoscopic procedure (13 retrosternal gastric bypasses and 4 retrosternal colonic bypasses). Patients with stricture at the hypopharynx (n = 2) or those in whom the stomach was contracted (n = 2) were considered for a laparoscopic esophagocoloplasty. The average duration of surgery of these latter four patients was 370 (380, 320, 360, and 420) min and the mean estimated blood loss was 100 mL. All patients could be ambulated on the first postoperative day and were allowed oral liquids by the 7th postoperative day. Compared with patients who underwent an open colonic bypass, there was significantly less need for analgesics. At a median follow-up of 5 (range 3–6) months, all patients are euphagic to solid diet and have excellent cosmetic results.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic colonic bypass is an achievable, safe, and effective procedure for the management of corrosive strictures of the esophagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mansour KA, Bryan FC, Carlson GW (1997) Bowel interposition for esophageal replacement: twenty-five-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 64(3):752–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Knezevíc JD, Radovanovíc NS, Simíc AP et al (2007) Colon interposition in the treatment of esophageal caustic strictures: 40 years of experience. Dis Esophagus 20(6):530–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raffensperger JG, Luck SR, Reynolds M et al (1996) Intestinal bypass of the esophagus. J Pediatr Surg 31(1):38–46 discussion 46–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Javed A, Pal S, Dash NR, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK (2011) Outcome following surgical management of corrosive strictures of the esophagus. Ann Surg 254(1):62–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta NM, Gupta R (2004) Transhiatal esophageal resection for corrosive injury. Ann Surg 239(3):359–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spitz L, Kiely E, Pierro A (2004) Gastric transposition in children—a 21-year experience. J Pediatr Surg 39(3):276–281 discussion 276–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marujo WC, Tannuri U, Maksoud JG (1991) Total gastric transposition: an alternative to esophageal replacement in children. J Pediatr Surg 26(6):676–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Javed A, Agarwal AK (2012) Laparoscopic retrosternal bypass for corrosive stricture of the esophagus. Surg Endosc 26(11):3344–3349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Javed A, Pal S, Krishnan EK, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK (2012) Surgical management and outcomes of severe gastrointestinal injuries due to corrosive ingestion. World J Gastrointest Surg 4(5):121–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin TS, Kuo SJ, Chou MC (2003) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colon mobilization for esophageal reconstruction. Surg Endosc 17(1):115–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Amit Javed and Anil K. Agarwal have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil K. Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Javed, A., Agarwal, A.K. Total laparoscopic esophageal bypass using a colonic conduit for corrosive-induced esophageal stricture. Surg Endosc 27, 3726–3732 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2956-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2956-x

Keywords

Navigation