Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic transaxillary endocrine surgery: a comparison with conventional open technique

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Robotic transaxillary (RT) endocrine surgery may improve cosmetic outcomes. We report our initial experience in RT thyroid and parathyroid surgery and the associated learning curve, and compare early surgical outcomes to those of open thyroidectomy (OT) and focal parathyroidectomy (FP).

Methods

A prospective database review identified patients who had undergone RT endocrine surgery. A case-matched group who underwent OT or FP was also identified. Demographics, histopathology, operative outcomes, and follow-up data were collected. Groups were compared using Student’s t test and the χ2 test.

Results

Fifteen RT procedures were performed: 11 RT thyroidectomies (6 total, 5 lobectomies) and 4 RT parathyroidectomies (2 focal, 2 unilateral), representing 5.9% and 2.2% of thyroidectomies and parathyroidectomies performed. The OT group contained 16 patients (13 totals, 3 lobectomies). The FP group contained 12 patients. There was no significant difference in age, gender, BMI, pathology, or complications between the groups. Mean operating time was significantly longer in the RT group (232 vs. 109 min, P = 0.0002) as was mean incision length (6 vs. 3.6 cm, P < 0.0001). No RT procedures were converted and no major complications occurred. Operating time decreased significantly over consecutive cases demonstrating a learning curve.

Conclusions

RT thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy can be performed safely by specialist endocrine surgeons, early in their learning curve, without an increased complication rate, albeit with significantly longer operating times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gagner M (1996) Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg 83:875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huscher CS, Chiodini S, Napolitano C, Recher A (1997) Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surg Endosc 11:877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ikeda Y, Takami H, Niimi M, Kan S, Sasaki Y, Takayama J (2001) Endoscopic thyroidectomy by the axillary approach. Surg Endosc 15:1362–1364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee KE, Rao J, Youn YK (2009) Endoscopic thyroidectomy with the da Vinci robot system using the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA) technique: our initial experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:e71–e75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 23:2399–2406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KE, Koo do H, Kim SJ, Lee J, Park KS, Oh SK, Youn YK (2010) Outcomes of 109 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent robotic total thyroidectomy with central node dissection via the bilateral axillo-breast approach. Surgery 148:1207–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH, Lee KY, Jeong JJ, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS (2009) Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery 146:1048–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee J, Nah KY, Kim RM, Ahn YH, Soh EY, Chung WY (2010) Differences in postoperative outcomes, function, and cosmesis: open versus robotic thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 24:3186–3194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perrier ND, Randolph GW, Inabnet WB, Marple BF, VanHeerden J, Kuppersmith RB (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy: a framework for new technology assessment and safe implementation. Thyroid 20:1327–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee J, Yun JH, Nam KH, Soh EY, Chung WY (2010) The learning curve for robotic thyroidectomy: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18:226–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berber E, Heiden K, Akyildiz H, Milas M, Mitchell J, Siperstein A (2010) Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: report of 2 cases and description of the technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:e60–e63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee J, Lee JH, Nah KY, Soh EY, Chung WY (2011) Comparison of endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 18(5):1439–1446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Landry CS, Grubbs EG, Stephen Morris G, Turner NS, Christopher Holsinger F, Lee JE, Perrier ND (2010) Robot assisted transaxillary surgery (RATS) for the removal of thyroid and parathyroid glands. Surgery 149:549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tae K, Ji YB, Jeong JH, Lee SH, Jeong MA, Park CW (2010) Robotic thyroidectomy by a gasless unilateral axillo-breast or axillary approach: our early experiences. Surg Endosc 25:221–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kandil E, Abdel Khalek M, Thomas M, Bellows CF (2011) Are bilateral axillary incisions needed or is just a single unilateral incision sufficient for robotic-assisted total thyroidectomy? Arch Surg 146:240–241 (author reply 241)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR (2010) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 303:235–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ministry of Health KC (2008) Korea national health and nutrition examination survey (KNHANES IV) 2007—health examination. Korean CDC, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Christina S. Foley, Orhan Agcaoglu, Allan E. Siperstein, and Eren Berber have no financial or grant support or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eren Berber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foley, C.S., Agcaoglu, O., Siperstein, A.E. et al. Robotic transaxillary endocrine surgery: a comparison with conventional open technique. Surg Endosc 26, 2259–2266 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2169-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2169-8

Keywords

Navigation