Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is associated with a decrease in postoperative pain, shortened hospital stay, earlier return to normal activity, and decrease in chronic pain. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery performed with needlescopic instruments has more advantages than conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, there are few reports of large-scale laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments (nTAPP). This report reviews our experiences with 352 nTAPP in 317 patients during the 15-year period from April 1996 to April 2011.

Methods

We performed nTAPP as the method of choice in 88.5% of all patients presenting with inguinal hernia. To perform the nTAPP, 3-mm instruments were used. A 5-mm laparoscope was inserted from the umbilicus, and surgical instruments were inserted through 5- and 3-mm trocars. After reduction of the hernia sac and dissection of the preperitoneal space, we placed polyester mesh or polypropylene soft mesh with staple fixation. The peritoneum was closed with 3–0 silk interrupted sutures.

Results

The mean operative time was 102.9 min for unilateral hernias and 155.8 min for bilateral hernias. There was no conversion to open repair. Forty-three patients (13.6%) used postoperative analgesics, and the mean frequency of use was 0.5 times. Regarding intraoperative complications, we observed one bladder injury, but no bowel injuries or major vessel injuries. Postoperative complications occurred in 32 patients (10.1%). One patient with a retained lipoma required reoperation. There was no incidence of chronic pain or mesh infection. The operative time for experienced surgeons (≥20 repairs) was significantly shorter than that of inexperienced surgeons (<20 repairs; P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The nTAPP was a safe and useful technique for inguinal hernia repair. Large prospective, randomized controlled trials will be required to establish the benefit of nTAPP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Memon MA, Cooper NJ, Memon B, Memon MI, Abrams KR (2003) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 90(12):1479–1492

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM; EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001785

  3. Schmedt CG, Sauerland S, Bittner R (2005) Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs. Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 19(5):605–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuhry E, van Veen RN, Langeveld HR, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ (2007) Open or endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 21(2):161–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A (1998) Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(3):171–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kimura T, Wada H, Yoshida M, Kobayashi T, Kawabe A, Isogaki J, Ban S, Kazui T (1998) Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using fine-caliber instruments and polyester mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(4):300–303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: a new era. Surgery 114(1):1–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23(4):920–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahman SH, John BJ (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal mesh hernia repair: a feasible approach. Hernia 14(3):329–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamme C, Scheidbach H, Hampe C, Schneider C, Köckerling F (2003) Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc 17(2):190–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr. Hidetoshi Wada, Dr. Taizo Kimura, Dr. Akihiro Kawabe, Dr. Masanori Sato, Dr. Yuichirou Miyaki, Dr. Junpei Tochikubo, Dr. Kouji Inamori, and Dr. Norihiko Shiiya have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidetoshi Wada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wada, H., Kimura, T., Kawabe, A. et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients. Surg Endosc 26, 1898–1902 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2122-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2122-2

Keywords

Navigation