Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endoscope-assisted versus conventional second branchial cleft cyst resection

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study evaluates the feasibility of endoscope-assisted second branchial cleft cyst resection via retroauricular approach by comparing it with conventional cervical incision for removal of second branchial cleft cyst.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2010, 25 patients were randomly assigned to the endoscope-assisted surgery group (13 patients) or the conventional surgery group (12 patients). The clinical characteristics of patients, operation time, operative bleeding volume, postoperative complications, and subjective satisfaction with incision scar checked by visual analog scale were compared between the groups, retrospectively.

Results

All 13 second branchial cleft cyst resections were successfully performed endoscopically, and the wounds healed uneventfully. Endoscope-assisted surgery lasted 54.6 ± 6.3 min, and conventional surgery lasted 49.6 ± 6.9 min (P = 0.069). Degree of bleeding volume did not differ between the groups (P = 0.624). Mean patient satisfaction score was 9.2 ± 0.6 in the endoscope-assisted surgery group and 6.2 ± 0.8 in the controls (P < 0.001). All 13 patients in the endoscope-assisted surgery group were satisfied with their cosmetic results. One case showed temporary numbness around the earlobe that recovered within 1 month after surgery. No marginal nerve palsy occurred. No complications such as bleeding, salivary fistula, or paresis of the marginal mandibular branch occurred. All 25 patients were disease free with follow-up of 6–24 months (median 16 months).

Conclusions

Endoscope-assisted second branchial cleft cyst resection via retroauricular approach is a feasible technique. This procedure may serve as an alternative approach that allows an invisible incision and better cosmetic results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acierno SP, Waldhausen JH (2007) Congenital cervical cysts, sinuses and fistulae. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 40:161–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agaton-Bonilla FC, Gay-Escoda C (1996) Diagnosis and treatment of branchial cleft cysts and fistulae. A retrospective study of 183 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25:449–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gagner M (1996) Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg 83:875

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hüscher CS, Chiodini S, Napolitano C, Recher A (1997) Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surg Endosc 11:877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Berti P, Vignali E, Pinchera A, Marcocci C (1999) Video-assisted versus conventional parathyroidectomy in primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective randomized study. Surgery 126:1117–1121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohgami M, Ishii S, Arisawa Y, Ohmori T, Noga K, Furukawa T, Kitajima M (2000) Scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: breast approach for better cosmesis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:1–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang XM, Zheng YQ, Liu X, Sun W, Zeng L, Cai X, Liu W, Xu Y, Zhang Z, Huang H (2009) A comparison between endoscope-assisted partial parotidectomy and conventional partial parotidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:70–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang XM, Sun W, Liu X, Liu W, Guan Z, Xu Y, Zheng Y (2009) Endoscope-assisted partial-superficial parotidectomy through a concealed postauricular skin incision. Surg Endosc 23:1614–1619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun W, Xu YD, Zheng YQ, Liu X, Zeng L, Liu W, Huang X (2009) Endoscope-assisted partial-superficial parotidectomy through two small skin incisions. Acta Otolarygol 129:1493–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang XM, Sun W, Zeng L, Liu X, Lu X, Xu YD, Zhang ZG, Xu G (2011) Gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy via an anterior chest approach—a review of 219 cases with benign tumor. World J Surg 35:1281–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen WL, Fang SL (2009) Removal of second branchial cleft cysts using a retroauricular approach. Head Neck 31:695–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes J, Stephens J, Amonoo-Kuofi K, Mochloulis G (2009) Facelift approach to upper cervical surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141:783–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roh JL (2005) Retroauricular hairline incision for removal of upper neck masses. Laryngoscope 115:2161–2166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roh JL, Yoon YH (2008) Removal of pediatric branchial cleft cyst using a retroauricular hairline incision (RAHI) approach. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:1503–1507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guerrissi JO (2010) Minimal invasive surgery in head and neck: video-assisted technique. J Craniofac Surg 21:882–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsui Y, Iwai T, Tohnai I, Maegawa J (2008) Endoscopically assisted resection of a branchial cyst. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:336–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Markkanen-Leppänen M, Pitkäranta A (2004) Parotidectomy using the Harmonic scalpel. Laryngoscope 114:381–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Terris DJ, Seybt MW, Gourin CG, Chin E (2006) Ultrasonic technology facilitates minimal access thyroid surgery. Laryngoscope 116:851–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Karl-Storz Corporation and Johnson & Johnson Corporation for providing surgical equipment.

Disclosures

Authors Liang-si Chen, Wei Sun, Pei-na Wu, Si-yi Zhang, Mi-mi Xu, Xiao-ning Luo, Jian-dong Zhan, and Xiaoming Huang have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Huang.

Additional information

Liang-si Chen and Wei Sun contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Ls., Sun, W., Wu, Pn. et al. Endoscope-assisted versus conventional second branchial cleft cyst resection. Surg Endosc 26, 1397–1402 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2046-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2046-x

Keywords

Navigation