Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Medical image analysis: computer-aided diagnosis of gastric cancer invasion on endoscopic images

  • New Technology
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of diagnosing depth of wall invasion of gastric cancer on endoscopic images using computer-aided pattern recognition.

Methods

The back propagation algorithm was used for computer training. Data of 344 patients who underwent gastrectomy or endoscopic tumor resection between 2001 and 2010 and their 902 endoscopic images were collected. The images were divided into ten groups among which the number of patients and images were almost equally distributed according to T staging. The computer learning was performed using about 800 images from all but one group, and the accuracy rate of diagnosing the depth of wall invasion of gastric cancer was calculated using the remaining group of about 90 images. The various numbers of input layers, hidden layers, and learning counts were updated, and the ideal setting was decided. Similar learning and diagnostic procedures were repeated ten times using every group and all 902 images were tested. The accuracy rate was calculated based on the ideal setting.

Results

The most appropriate setting was a resolution of 16 × 16, a hidden layer of 240, and a learning count of 50. In the next step, using all the images on the ideal setting, the overall accuracy rate was 64.7%. The diagnostic accuracy was 77.2, 49.1, 51.0, and 55.3% in the T1, T2, T3, and T4 stagings, respectively. The accuracy was 68.9% in T1a(M) staging and 63.6% in T1b(SM) staging. The positive predictive values were 80.1, 41.6, 51.4, and 55.8% in the T1, T2, T3, and T4 staging, respectively. It was 69.2% in T1a(M) staging and 68.3% in T1b(SM) staging.

Conclusion

Computer-aided diagnosis is useful for diagnosing depth of wall invasion of gastric cancer on endoscopic images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Duncan JS, Ayache N (2000) Medical image analysis: progress over two decades and the challenges ahead. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 22:85–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamashita K, Yoshiura T, Arimura H, Mihara F, Noguchi T, Hiwatashi A, Togao O, Yamashita Y, Shono T, Kumazawa S, Higashida Y, Honda H (2008) Performance evaluation of radiologists with artificial neural network for differential diagnosis of intra-axial cerebral tumors on MRI images. Am J Neuroradiol 29:1153–1158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Oda S, Awai K, Suzuki K, Yanaga Y, Funama Y, MacMahon H, Yamashita Y (2009) Performance of radiologists in detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: effect of rib suppression with a massive-training artificial neural network. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W397–W402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suzuki K (2009) Supervised “lesion-enhancement” filter by use of a massive-training artificial neural network (MTANN) in computer-aided diagnosis (CAD). Phys Med Biol 54:S31–S45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan HP, Doi K, Galhotra S, Vyborny CJ, MacMahon H, Jokich PM (1987) Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. Med Phys 14:538–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilhuijis KG, Giger ML, Bick U (1998) Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. Med Phys 25:1647–1654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Horsch K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Venta LA (2004) Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. Acad Radiol 11:272–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Drukker K, Giger ML, Metz CE (2005) Robustness of computerized lesion detection and classification scheme across different breast US platforms. Radiology 237:834–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suzuki K, Yoshida H, Nappi J, Dachman AH (2006) Massive-training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computer-aided detection of polyps: suppression of rectal tubes. Med Phys 33:3814–3824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suzuki K, Yoshida H, Nappi J, Armato SG III, Dachman AH (2008) Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography. Med Phys 35:694–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshida H, Nappi J (2001) Three-dimensional computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of colon polyps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20:1261–1274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  13. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2010) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 14th edn. Kanehara Publication, Tokyo (in Japanese)

  14. Sakai K (2003) Foundation and application of digital image processing. CQ Publication, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kienle P, Buhl K, Kuntz C, Düx M, Hartmann C, Axel B, Herfarth C, Lehnert T (2002) Prospective comparison of endoscopy, endosonography and computed tomography for staging of tumours of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Digestion 66:230–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shimoyama S, Yasuda H, Hashimoto M, Tatsutomi Y, Aoki F, Mafune K, Kaminishi M (2006) Accuracy of linear-array EUS for preoperative staging of gastric cardia cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 60:50–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wakelin SJ, Deans C, Crofts TJ, Allan PL, Plevris JN, Paterson-Brown S (2006) A comparison of computerized tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 41:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsendsuren T, Jun SM, Mian XH (2006) Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative TNM staging of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 12:43–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST, Kim JS, Kim KW, Kim PN, Lee MG, Ha HK (2006) Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236:879–885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Polkowski M, Palucki J, Wronska E, Szawlowski A, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Butruk E (2006) Endosonography versus helical computed tomography for locoregional staging of gastric cancer. Endoscopy 36:617–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. Takashi Miyata, Mr. Tatsuya Shirai, and Mr. Kei Takahashi of the Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, for their valuable advice and the excellent computer programming they provided.

Disclosures

Drs. Keisuke Kubota, Junko Kuroda, Masashi Yoshida, Keiichiro Ohta, and Masaki Kitajima have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keisuke Kubota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kubota, K., Kuroda, J., Yoshida, M. et al. Medical image analysis: computer-aided diagnosis of gastric cancer invasion on endoscopic images. Surg Endosc 26, 1485–1489 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2036-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2036-z

Keywords

Navigation