Abstract
Background
Prolonged liver retraction during radical gastrectomy for adequate exposure of the hepatogastric ligament may lead to hepatic trauma. The authors offer a new minimally traumatic liver retraction method using a simple liver suspension with a gauze suture and compare it with the modified liver-puncture method.
Methods
This study retrospectively evaluated 92 patients who underwent the liver-suspension or liver-puncture method during gastric resections in 2010. Their clinical and operative characteristics were analyzed together with perioperative transaminases, and the two groups were compared. Patients with a history of liver disease, abnormal preoperative liver function test results, postoperative complications, or combined operations were excluded from the study. The liver-suspension method was performed using two 4 × 4-in. gauze pads threaded with a 2-0 Prolene suture, which were secured to the pars condensa with surgical clips and externally tied to suspend the liver toward the abdominal wall.
Results
Each liver retraction was completed without intraoperative complications. The patients in the liver-suspension group had more nonhepatic comorbidities than those in the liver-puncture group (P = 0.029). Other patient characteristics such as age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) did not differ between the two groups. No differences were found between the groups in terms of mean operative time (200.3 ± 66.9 vs 214.9 ± 74.4) or preoperative mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels. However, the patients in the liver-suspension group had significantly lower postoperative mean ALT levels (postoperative days 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5) and mean AST levels (postoperative days 0 and 1).
Conclusion
Compared with the liver-puncture method, the authors’ novel liver-suspension with suture-gauze technique is a safe and effective method for retracting the liver during laparoscopic and robotic upper abdominal surgeries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jakimowicz J, Stultiens G, Smulders F (1998) Laparoscopic insufflation of the abdomen reduces portal venous flow. Surg Endosc 12:129–132
Morris-Stiff G, Jones R, Mitchell S, Barton K, Hassn A (2008) Retraction transaminitis: an inevitable but benign complication of laparoscopic fundoplication. World J Surg 32:2650–2654
Morino M, Giraudo G, Festa V (1998) Alterations in hepatic function during laparoscopic surgery: an experimental clinical study. Surg Endosc 12:968–972
Sato K, Kawamura T, Wakusawa R (2000) Hepatic blood flow and function in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 90:1198–1202
Lee JH, Ryu KW, Doh YW, Bae JS, Kim YW, Bae JM (2007) Liver lift: a simple suture technique for liver retraction during laparoscopic gastric surgery. J Surg Oncol 95:83–85
Bann S, Butler A, Shaul T, Foley R (2005) A technique for insertion of the laparoscopic Nathanson liver retractor. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87:472–473
Shinohara T, Kanaya S, Yoshimura F, Hiramatsu Y, Haruta S, Kawamura Y, Giacopuzzi S, Fujita T, Uyama I (2011) A protective technique for retraction of the liver during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: using a Penrose drain. J Gastrointest Surg 15(6):1043–1048
Shabbir A, Lee JH, Lee MS, Park do J, Kim HH (2010) Combined suture retraction of the falciform ligament and the left lobe of the liver during laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 24:3237–3240
Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH (2009) Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 23:1204–1211
Hyung WJ, Song C, Cheong JH, Choi SH, Noh SH (2007) Factors influencing operation time of laparoscopy-assisted distal subtotal gastrectomy: analysis of consecutive 100 initial cases. Eur J Surg Oncol 33:314–319
Galvani CA, Choh M, Gorodner MV (2010) Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy using a novel technique for liver retraction. JSLS 14:228–233
De la Torre RA, Satgunam S, Morales MP, Dwyer CL, Scott JS (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement with liver suture retractor. Obes Surg 19:1707–1710
Saber AA, Elgamal MH, Itawi EA, Rao AJ (2008) Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS): a novel technique. Obes Surg 18:1338–1342
Nguyen NT, Braley S, Fleming NW, Lambourne L, Rivers R, Wolfe BM (2003) Comparison of postoperative hepatic function after laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass. Am J Surg 186:40–44
Lohlun JC, Guirguis A, Wise L (2004) Elevated liver enzymes following open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: does timing of liver retraction affect the rise in the levels of transaminases? Obes Surg 14:505–508
Huang CK, Lin YH, Huang HP, Hsu WL, Tien HH (2010) Single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: a novel minimally invasive surgical technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20:e99–e102
Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH (2010) Feasibility of single-access laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in super-super obese patients. Surg Innov 17:36–40
Varela JE (2009) Single-site laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: preclinical use of a novel multi-access port device. Surg Innov 16:207–210
Gimenez E, Leeser DB, Wysock JS, Charlton M, Kapur S, Del Pizzo JJ (2010) Laparoendoscopic single-site live donor nephrectomy: initial experience. J Urol 184:2049–2053
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant of the Korea Healthcare technology R&D project, Ministry of Health, Welfare, & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (1020410).
Disclosures
Yanghee Woo, Woo Jin Hyung, Hyoung-il Kim, Kazutaka Obama, Taeil Son, and Sung Hoon Noh have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woo, Y., Hyung, W.J., Kim, HI. et al. Minimizing hepatic trauma with a novel liver retraction method: a simple liver suspension using gauze suture. Surg Endosc 25, 3939–3945 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1788-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1788-9