Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: long-term results of a prospective, randomized trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis has proven short-term benefits, but little data are available from prospective randomized trials regarding long-term outcome, quality of life, and functional results.

Methods

Of 113 patients randomized to undergo laparoscopic (LAP) versus open (OP) sigmoid resection for diverticulitis, 105 (93%, LAP = 54, OP = 51) patients were examined and answered the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) questionnaire, with a median follow-up of 30 (range, 9–63) months after surgery.

Results

Incisional hernias were detected in five (9.8%) patients in the OP group versus seven (12.9%) in the LAP group, P = 0.84). Overall satisfaction with the operation on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 10 (excellent) was 9 (range, 2–10) in the OP group versus 9 (range, 2–10) in the LAP group (P = 0.78). Median GIQLI score was 115 (range, 57–144) in the OP group versus 110 (range, 61–134) in the LAP group (P = 0.17). Overall satisfaction with the cosmetic aspect of the scar on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 10 (excellent) was 8 (range, 1–10) in the OP group versus 9 (range, 0–10) in the LAP group (P = 0.01). Finally, median hospital cost (including reoperations for hernias) was 11,606 (5,230–147,982) CHF in the LAP group versus 12,138 (6,098–39,786) CHF in the OP group (P = 0.47).

Conclusions

Both open and laparoscopic approaches for sigmoid resection achieve good long-term results in terms of gastrointestinal function, quality of life, and patients’ satisfaction. Significant long-term benefits of laparoscopic surgery are restricted to cosmetic (ClinicalTrials.gov protocol #NCT00453830).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klarenbeek BR, Veenhof AA, Bergamaschi R, van der Peet DL, van den Broek WT, de Lange ES, Bemelman WA, Heres P, Lacy AM, Engel AF, Cuesta MA (2009) Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomized control trial. Ann Surg 249:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller JM (2005) Short-term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003145

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kasparek MS, Muller MH, Glatzle J, Manncke K, Becker HD, Zittel TT, Kreis ME (2003) Postoperative colonic motility in patients following laparoscopic-assisted and open sigmoid colectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 7(18):1073–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, Chau WY, Tootla A, Tootla F, Silva YJ (2002) Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1309–1314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seitz G, Seitz EM, Kasparek MS, Konigsrainer A, Kreis ME (2008) Long-term quality-of-life after open and laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:162–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dowson HM, Bong JJ, Lovell DP, Worthington TR, Karanjia ND, Rockall TA (2008) Reduced adhesion formation following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 95:909–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Andersen LP, Klein M, Gogenur I, Rosenberg J (2008) Incisional hernias after open versus laparoscopic sigmoid resection. Surg Endosc 22:2026–2029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Delaney CP, Chang E, Senagore AJ, Broder M (2008) Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database. Ann Surg 247:819–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Forgione A, Leroy J, Cahill RA, Bailey C, Simone M, Mutter D, Marescaux J (2009) Prospective evaluation of functional outcome after laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Ann Surg 249:218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gervaz P, Inan I, Perneger T, Schiffer E, Morel P (2010) A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Ann Surg 252:3–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H (1995) Gastrointestinal quality of life index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bridoux V, Moutel G, Lefebure B, Scotte M, Michot F, Herve C, Tuech JJ (2010) Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials in gastrointestinal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 14:156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor GW, Jayne DG, Brown SR, Thorpe H, Brown JM, Dewberry SC, Parker MC, Guillou PJ (2010) Adhesions and incisional hernias following laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer in the CLASICC trial. Br J Surg 97:70–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuhry E, Schwenk W, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003432

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gervaz P, Zmora O, Wexner SD (2001) Converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 15:827–832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bashankaev B, Wexner SD (2009) Surgery: new indications for laparoscopic sigmoidectomy. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:388–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scarpa M, Erroi F, Ruffolo C, Mollica E, Polese L, Pozza G, Norberto L, D’Amico DF, Angriman I (2009) Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer: quality of life, body image, cosmesis, and functional results. Surg Endosc 23:577–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eshuis EJ, Polle SW, Slors JF, Hommes DW, Sprangers MA, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA (2008) Long-term surgical recurrence, morbidity, quality of life, and body image of laparoscopic-assisted vs. open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 51:858–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Frasson M, Di Serio C, Di Carlo V (2005) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:890–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Janson M, Bjorholt I, Carlsson P, Haglind E, Henriksson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg 91:409–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Pascal Gervaz and Ihsan Inan have been employed since 2008 as consultants and have received honoraria from Covidien (formerly Tyco Healthcare) for a total sum of 4,000 Euros each per year. Béatrice Mugnier-Konrad, Philippe Morel, and Olivier Huber have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Gervaz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gervaz, P., Mugnier-Konrad, B., Morel, P. et al. Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticulitis: long-term results of a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 25, 3373–3378 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1728-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1728-8

Keywords

Navigation