Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study compares surgical techniques and surgeon’s standing position during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), investigating each with respect to surgeons’ learning, performance, and ergonomics. Little homogeneity exists in LC performance and training. Variations in standing position (side-standing technique vs. between-standing technique) and hand technique (one-handed vs. two-handed) exist.

Methods

Thirty-two LC procedures performed on a virtual reality simulator were video-recorded and analyzed. Each subject performed four different procedures: one-handed/side-standing, one-handed/between-standing, two-handed/side-standing, and two-handed/between-standing. Physical ergonomics were evaluated using Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). Mental workload assessment was acquired with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Virtual reality (VR) simulator-generated performance evaluation and a subjective survey were analyzed.

Results

RULA scores were consistently lower (indicating better ergonomics) for the between-standing technique and higher (indicating worse ergonomics) for the side-standing technique, regardless of whether one- or two-handed. Anatomical scores overall showed side-standing to have a detrimental effect on the upper arms and trunk. The NASA-TLX showed significant association between the side-standing position and high physical demand, effort, and frustration (p < 0.05). The two-handed technique in the side-standing position required more effort than the one-handed (p < 0.05). No difference in operative time or complication rate was demonstrated among the four procedures. The two-handed/between-standing method was chosen as the best procedure to teach and standardize.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses a risk of physical injury to the surgeon. As LC is currently commonly performed in the United States, the left side-standing position may lead to increased physical demand and effort, resulting in ergonomically unsound conditions for the surgeon. Though further investigations should be conducted, adopting the between-standing position deserves serious consideration as it may be the best short-term ergonomic alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chung R, Pham Q, Wojtasik L, Chari V, Chen P (2003) The laparoscopic experience of surgical graduates in the United States. Surg Endosc 17:1792–1795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fabiani P, Iovine L, Katkhouda J, Gugenheim J, Mouiel J (1993) Dissection du triangle de Calot par voie coelioscopique. Presse Med 22:535–537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180:101–125

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Litwin DEM, Cahan MA (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Clin North Am 88:1295–1313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perissat J (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the European experience. Am J Surg 165:444–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Elhage O, Murphy D, Challacombe B, Shortland A, Dasgupta P (2007) Ergonomics in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Clin Pract 61:186–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frezza EE (2005) The lithotomy versus the supine position for laparoscopic advanced surgeries: a historical review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 15:140–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJ, Hoff C, Totte ER, Pierie JN (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23:1279–1285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Welty G, Schippers E, Grablowitz V, Lawong AG, Tittel A, Schumpelick V (2002) Is laparoscopic cholecystectomy a mature operative technique? Surg Endosc 16:820–827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Phillips E, Daykhovsky L, Carroll B, Gershman A, Grundfest WS (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: instrumentation and technique. J Laparoendosc Surg 1:3–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reddick E, Olsen D, Daniel J, Saye W, McKernan B, Miller W, Hoback M (1989) Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. Laser Med Surg Adv 7:38–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Technique and complications. Report of 2,665 cases. Bull Acad Natl Med 175:1059–1066; discussion 1066–1068

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kauvar DS, Braswell A, Brown BD, Harnisch M (2006) Influence of resident and attending surgeon seniority on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 132:159–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosin D (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In: Zinner MJ, Schwartz SE, Ellis H (eds) Maingot’s abdominal surgery. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk, CT, pp 1855–1865

    Google Scholar 

  15. McAtamney L, Corlett EN (1993) RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Appl Ergon 24:91–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee EC, Rafiq A, Merrell R, Ackerman R, Dennerlein JT (2005) Ergonomics and human factors in endoscopic surgery: a comparison of manual vs telerobotic simulation systems. Surg Endosc 19:1064–1070

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carswell GM, Clarke D, Seales WB (2005) Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 12:80–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawson E, Curet M, Sanchez B, Schuster R, Berguer R (2007) Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project. J Robot Surg 1:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Berguer R, Chen J, Smith WD (2003) A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Arch Surg 138:967–970

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (1999) Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:466–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Uhrich ML, Underwood RA, Standeven JW, Soper NJ, Engsberg JR (2002) Assessment of fatigue, monitor placement, and surgical experience during simulated laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:635–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D (2009) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210:306–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D’Acapito F, Vellone M, Murazio M, Capelli G (2005) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on 56 591 cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 140:986–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen NT, Hung S, Ho HS, Smith WD, Philipps C, Lewis C, Rodel M, De Vera RM, Berguer R (2001) An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons’ axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during endoscopic and open surgery. Am J Surg 182:720–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Person JG, Hodgson AJ, Nagy AG (2001) Automated high-frequency posture sampling for ergonomic assessment of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 9:997–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bridger RS (2003) Introduction to ergonomics, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vereczkei A, Feussner H, Negele T, Fritzsche F, Seitz T, Bubb H, Horvath OP (2004) Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1118–1122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bello F, Chang A, Darzi A (2004) Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: construct and concurrent validity. Surg Endosc 18:1608–1612

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Adrales GL, Chu UB, Hoskins JD, Witzke DB, Park AE (2004) Development of a valid, cost-effective laparoscopic training program. Am J Surg 187:157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Youssef, Lee, Godinez, Sutton, Seagull, Park in addition to Ms. Klein and Mr. George have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of General Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S. Greene Street, Rm S4B14, Baltimore, MD, 21201-1595, USA

    Yassar Youssef, Gyusung Lee, Carlos Godinez, Erica Sutton, Rosemary V. Klein, Ivan M. George, F. Jacob Seagull & Adrian Park

Authors
  1. Yassar Youssef
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gyusung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carlos Godinez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Erica Sutton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rosemary V. Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ivan M. George
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. F. Jacob Seagull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Adrian Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Park.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Youssef, Y., Lee, G., Godinez, C. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy poses physical injury risk to surgeons: analysis of hand technique and standing position. Surg Endosc 25, 2168–2174 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1517-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1517-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation