Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cost comparison

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) should not cost more or less than traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

Retrospective cost data were collected from the accounting records of a single institution. A direct comparison of LC and SILC was conducted. Data on the SILC cases converted to LC were included. The total operating room (OR) cost (actual cost to the hospital for equipment, time, and personnel) and the total OR charges (total derived from the OR cost plus a margin to cover overhead costs beyond material costs) were examined. The total hospital charges (OR charges plus hospital charges accrued in the perioperative period) also were included. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data, with p values less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

Over a period of 19 months, 116 cases of minimally invasive cholecystectomy were evaluated. Of the 116 patients, 48 underwent LC during the first half of that period, and 68 patients underwent SILC during the second half of that period. Nine of the single-incision procedures were converted to traditional LC, for a 13% conversion rate. The groups were well matched from a demographics standpoint, with no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diagnoses, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, or payment. Comparison of all attempted SILCs, including those converted, with all LCs showed no significant difference in cost category totals. A significant difference among all cost variables was found when SILCs were compared with SILCs that required conversion to LC. A significant difference among the cost variables also was found when LCs were compared with converted SILCs.

Conclusion

The cost for SILC did not differ significantly from that for LC when standard materials were used and the duration of the procedure was considered. Converted cases were significantly more expensive than completed SILC and LC cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chamberlain RS, Sakpal SV (2009) A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1733–1740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross SB, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:188–192 Epub 22 November 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen NT, Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Wilson SE (2009) Laparoscopic transumbilical cholecystectomy without visible abdominal scars. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1125–1128 Epub 15 August 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826 discussion 826–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zornig C, Emmermann A, von Waldenfels HA, Mofid H (2007) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach. Endoscopy 39:913–915

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmüller C (2008) Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 22:1427–1429 Epub 9 April 2008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME, Odze RD, Rattner DW, Thompson CC (2006) Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 64:428–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simopoulos C, Kouklakis G, Zezos P, Ypsilantis P, Botaitis S, Tsalikidis C, Pitiakoudis M (2009) Peroral transgastric endoscopic procedures in pigs: feasibility, survival, questionings, and pitfalls. Surg Endosc 23:394–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Coumaros D, Marescaux J (2008) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: transgastric cholecystectomy in a survivalvporcine model. Surg Endosc 22:1126–1130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gumbs AA, Milone L, Sinha P, Bessler M (2009) Totally transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:533–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc 23:896–899

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Curcillo PG II, Wu AS, Podolsky ER, Graybeal C, Katkhouda N, Saenz A, Dunham R, Fendley S, Neff M, Copper C, Bessler M, Gumbs AA, Norton M, Iannelli A, Mason R, Moazzez A, Cohen L, Mouhlas A, Poor A (2010) Single-port-access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases. Surg Endosc 24(8):1854–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Romanelli JR, Roshek TB III, Lynn DC, Earle DB (2010) Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial experience. Surg Endosc 24:1374–1379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Langwieler TE, Nimmesgern T, Back M (2009) Single-port access in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 23:1138–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Podolsky ER, Rottman SJ, Curcillo PG III (2009) Single-port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: two-year follow-up. JSLS 13:528–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brody F, Vaziri K, Kasza J, Edwards C (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 210:e9–e13 Epub 3 December 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rivas H, Varela E, Scott D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial evaluation of a large series of patients. Surg Endosc 24:1403–1412 Epub 25 December 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ersin S, Firat O, Sozbilen M (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it more than a challenge? Surg Endosc 24:68–71 Epub 17 June 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts KE, Solomon D, Duffy AJ, Bell RL (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a surgeon’s initial experience with 56 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. J Gastrointest Surg 14:506–510 Epub 5 December 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Elsey JK, Feliciano DV (2010) Initial experience with single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 210(620–624):624–626

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hawasli A, Kandeel A, Meguid A (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC): a refined technique. Am J Surg 199:289–293 discussion 293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Erbella J Jr, Bunch GM (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the first 100 outpatients. Surg Endosc 24(8):1958–1961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Philipp SR, Miedema BW, Thaler K (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional instruments: early experience in comparison with the gold standard. J Am Coll Surg 209:632–637 Epub 11 September 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bittner R (2004) The standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 389:157–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hill CWL, Jones GR (2000) Strategic management theory: an integrated approach (chap 5): building competitive advantage through functional-level strategy. 5th ed. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston pp 161–162

  26. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC (1979) Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med 301:1364–1369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chung WC, Lee KT, Fan PL, Tzeng DS, Chiu HC (2006) Operating room costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does surgeon volume matter? Kaohsiung J Med Sci 22:126–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Slater M, Booth MI, Dehn TC (2009) Cost-effective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91:670–672 Epub 25 September 2009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Traverso LW, Hargrave K (1995) A prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169:503–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Curtis E. Bower is a preceptor/proctor for Covidien. Katie M. Love, Christopher A. Durham, Michael P. Meara, and Ashley C. Mays have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Pitt County Memorial Hospital, 600 Moye Boulevard, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA

    Katie M. Love, Christopher A. Durham, Michael P. Meara, Ashley C. Mays & Curtis E. Bower

Authors
  1. Katie M. Love
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher A. Durham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael P. Meara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashley C. Mays
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Curtis E. Bower
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curtis E. Bower.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Love, K.M., Durham, C.A., Meara, M.P. et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a cost comparison. Surg Endosc 25, 1553–1558 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1433-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1433-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation