Skip to main content
Log in

A case-controlled comparison of single-site access versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to compare patients who underwent single-site access laparoscopic appendectomy (SSALA) to those who underwent conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TPLA) in a case-controlled manner.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent SSALA for suspected acute appendicitis between April and September 2009 were retrospectively compared to those who underwent TPLA between January and December 2008 in a case-controlled manner. The patients were matched for age, gender, and pathological findings. The main outcome measurements included postoperative recovery, morbidities, and mortalities.

Results

During the study period, a total of 30 patients underwent SSALA and these were matched with 60 TPLA patients. There were no significant differences in the mean operative time, hospital stay, and 30-day morbidity rate between the two groups. None of the patients required conversion. Two patients with significant contamination and abscess collection noted during SSALA required a relaparotomy for peritoneal lavage and adhesiolysis due to prolonged ileus.

Conclusions

SSALA is feasible and the perioperative outcome was comparable to that of TPLA. However, future prospective studies will need to evaluate whether SSALA can adequately tackle patients with significant peritoneal contamination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001546

  2. Bennett J, Boddy A, Rhodes M (2007) Choice of approach for appendicectomy: a meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:245–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Desai MM, Rao PP, Aron M, Pascal-Haber G, Desai MR, Mishra S, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2008) Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int 101:83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Romanelli JR, Mark L, Omotosho PA (2008) Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the TriPort system: a case report. Surg Innov 15:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saber AA, Elgamal MH, Itawi EA, Rao AJ (2008) Single incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILS): a novel technique. Obes Surg 18:1338–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reavis KM, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Nguyen NT (2008) Single-laparoscopic incision transabdominal surgery sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 18:1444–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Desai MM, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 72:1190–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Reavis KM (2008) Single laparoscopic incision transabdominal (SLIT) surgery-adjustable gastric banding: a novel minimally invasive surgical approach. Obes Surg 18:1628–1631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gumbs AA, Milone L, Sinha P, Bessler M (2009) Totally transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:533–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Filipovic-Cugura J, Kirac I, Kulis T, Jankovic J, Bekavac-Beslin M (2009) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: first case. Surg Endosc 23:920–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walz MK, Alesina PF (2009) Single access retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (SARA)—one step beyond in endocrine surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:447–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barbaros U, Dinccag A (2009) Single incision laparoscopic splenectomy: the first two cases. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1520–1523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kosumi T, Kubota A, Usui N, Yamauchi K, Yamasaki M, Oyanagi H (2001) Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy using a single umbilical puncture method. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:63–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pappalepore N, Tursini S, Marino N, Lisi G, Lelli Chiesa P (2002) Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA): a safe and useful alternative for uncomplicated appendicitis. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:383–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 342:633–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Alessio A, Piro E, Tadini B, Beretta F (2002) One-trocar transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: our experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:24–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hong TH, Kim HL, Lee YS, Kim JJ, Lee KH, You YK, Oh SJ, Park SM (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA): scarless intracorporeal appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:75–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P (2009) Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience. Surg Innov 16:211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Romanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 23:1419–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their deepest appreciation to the entire surgical department for their assistance in recruiting the patients and their cooperation during the study. Dr. Teoh had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Disclosures

Drs. A. Y. B. Teoh, P. W. Y. Chiu, T. C. L. Wong, S. K. H. Wong, P. B. S. Lai, E. K. W. Ng have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enders Kwok Wai Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teoh, A.Y.B., Chiu, P.W.Y., Wong, T.C.L. et al. A case-controlled comparison of single-site access versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 25, 1415–1419 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1406-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1406-2

Keywords

Navigation