Abstract
Background
This study aimed to evaluate the acute and chronic fixation strength of fibrin sealant (FS) as an alternative method of fixation for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR).
Methods
Representative mesh types for LVHR included one nonabsorbable barrier mesh (Composix) and three absorbable barrier meshes (Sepramesh, Proceed, and Parietex composite). Macroporous polypropylene mesh (Prolite Ultra) served as the control mesh. Three methods of fixation were used, namely, 0-polypropylene suture + FS (ARTISS 4 IU), FS alone (ARTISS), and tacks alone, to secure 3 × 4-cm pieces of mesh (10 of each combination) to the peritoneal surface of New Zealand white rabbit abdominal wall. After 2 h of incubation at 37°C, specimens underwent acute testing. Subsequently, a chronic phase was completed using the aforementioned fixation methods (10 of each combination), in which two 4 × 4-cm pieces of mesh were secured intraperitoneally in each of 75 New Zealand white rabbits, which survived 8 weeks until they were sacrificed. A transparent grid overlay was used to measure the mesh and adhesion area. Adhesion tenacity was characterized using the Garrard adhesion scale. In both the acute and chronic samples, a 3 × 3-cm area of mesh–tissue interface underwent lap shear testing at a rate of 0.42 mm/s using a tensiometer (Instron 5542). The maximum load sustained by the mesh–tissue construct was recorded as the acute fixation strength in newtons (N). Data are given as means ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was determined using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) posttest or a nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test (adhesion scores).
Results
The acute fixation strength was significantly greater for all the meshes secured with either suture + FS or tacks alone than for FS alone (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). All the meshes except Proceed demonstrated greater acute fixation strength with suture + FS than with tacks alone (p ≤ 0.016). Composix achieved greater acute fixation with suture + FS than all the other meshes (p ≤ 0.022). Acute fixation with suture + FS was greater for Parietex Composite and ProLite Ultra than for Proceed (p ≤ 0.015). When the animals were sacrificed, 48 of 50 meshes fixed with FS alone were insufficiently affixed to the abdominal wall, which may have resulted in hernia recurrence in a hernia model. The chronic fixation strength was greater for all the mesh types with either suture + FS or tacks only than with FS alone (p ≤ 0.0005). The chronic fixation strength was greater with suture + FS than with tacks for Proceed and ProLite Ultra (p ≤ 0.013). Neither mesh area nor adhesion tenacity differed significantly with any mesh/fixation method combination.
Conclusions
In a chronic rabbit model of LVHR, fixation strength with FS alone was inadequate for selected nonabsorbable and absorbable barrier-coated meshes. The acute and chronic fixation strengths of suture + FS were equivalent or superior to the fixation strength of tacks alone. Using a combination of suture and FS for mesh fixation in LVHR may provide adequate fixation while decreasing postoperative pain due to spiral titanium tacks. In this preclinical series, mesh secured to the peritoneal surface by FS alone may have led to early recurrence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, Matthews BD, Brunt LM (2007) Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc 21:378–386
Carbonell AM, Harold KL, Mahmutovic AJ, Hassan R, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Local injection for the treatment of suture site pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Am Surg 69:688–691
Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–399
Karakousis CP, Volpe C, Tanski J, Colby ED, Winston J, Driscoll DL (1995) Use of a mesh for musculoaponeurotic defects of the abdominal wall in cancer surgery and the risk of bowel fistulas. J Am Coll Surg 181:11–16
Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Friedlander MH, Mason RJ, Kiyabu M, Grant SW, Achanta K, Kirkman EL, Narayanan K, Essani R (2001) Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 233:18–25
Joels CS, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Austin C, Norton HJ, Williams TC, Heniford BT (2005) Evaluation of adhesion formation, mesh fixation strength, and hydroxyproline content after intraabdominal placement of polytetrafluoroethylene mesh secured using titanium spiral tacks, nitinol anchors, and polypropylene suture or polyglactin 910 suture. Surg Endosc 19:780–785
Chevrel JP, Rath AM (1997) The use of fibrin glues in the surgical treatment of incisional hernias. Hernia 1:9–14
Lau H (2005) Fibrin sealant versus mechanical stapling for mesh fixation during endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 242:670–675
Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Lozac’h P (2005) Tisseel versus tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 19:724–727
Olmi S, Erba L, Bertolini A, Scaini A, Croce E (2006) Fibrin glue for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair: indications, technique, and outcomes. Surg Endosc 20:1846–1850
Schwab R, Willms A, Kröger A, Becker HP (2006) Less chronic pain following mesh fixation using a fibrin sealant in TEP inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:272–277
Lovisetto F, Zonta S, Rota E, Mazzilli M, Bardone M, Bottero L, Faillace G, Longoni M (2007) Use of human fibrin glue (Tissucol) versus staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg 245:222–231
Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Pisanelli MC, Bartoli A, Di Zitti L, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Stefanoni M, Patriti A (2008) Comparing fibrin sealant with staples for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal hernia repair: a case control-study. Surg Endosc 22:668–673
Goldenberg MM (2008) Pharmaceutical approval update. P T 33:299–302
Jenkins ED, Melman L, Deeken CR, Frisella MM Matthews BD (2009) Evaluation of fixation strength of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant. Data presented at the joint AHS/EHS meeting in Berlin, Germany, 9–12, Sep 2009
van’t Riet M, van Steenwijk PJ, Kleinrensink GJ, Steyerberg EW, Bonger HJ (2002) Tensile strength of mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 16:1713–1716
Melman L, Jenkins ED, Deeken CR, Brodt MD, Brown SR, Brunt LM, Eagon JC, Frisella MM, Matthews BD (2009) Evaluation of acute fixation strength for mechanical tacking devices and fibrin sealant versus polypropylene suture for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Data presented at the joint AHS/EHS meeting in Berlin, Germany, 9–12 Sep 2009
Eriksen JR, Bech JI, Linnemann D, Rosenberg J (2007) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal mesh fixation with fibrin sealant (TISEEL) vs titanium tacks: a randomized controlled experimental study in pigs. Hernia 12:483–491
Olmi S, Scaini A, Erba L, Croce E (2007) Use of fibrin glue (TISSUCOL) in laparoscopic repair of abdominal wall defects: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 21:409–413
Beattie GC, Rumar S, Nixon SJ (2000) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: mesh fixation is unnecessary. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg 10:71–73
Tamme C, Scheidbach H, Hampe C, Schneider C, Kockerling F (2003) Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP). Surg Endosc 17:190–195
Zieren J, Castenholz E, Jacobi CA, Zieren HU, Muller JM (1999) Is mesh fixation in abdominal hernia necessary? Langenbecks Arch Surg 384:71–75
Dunn DC (1995) Laparoscopic hernia repair without the use of staples or knotting manoeuvres. Br J Surg 82:1692
Macintyre IMC (1998) Does the mesh require fixation? Semin Laparosc Surg 5:224–226
Stoppa RE (1995) The preperitoneal approach and prosthetic repair of groin hernias. In: Nyhus LM, Condon RE (eds) hernia, 4th edn. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 188–206
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the efforts of Michael Brodt, M.S., Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA, for mechanical testing of acute samples. The experiments were funded by a research grant from Baxter Healthcare Corporation.
Disclosures
Corey R. Deeken has received consulting fees and an honorarium from Davol, Inc. Brent D. Matthews has received consulting fees from Atrium Medical, Ethicon EndoSurgery, and the Muskuloskeletal Transplant Foundation, and an honorarium for speaking from W.L. Gore. Eric D. Jenkins, Lora Melman, Salil Desai, Shaun R. Brown, and Margaret M. Frisella have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jenkins, E.D., Melman, L., Desai, S. et al. Evaluation of intraperitoneal placement of absorbable and nonabsorbable barrier coated mesh secured with fibrin sealant in a New Zealand white rabbit model. Surg Endosc 25, 604–612 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1230-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1230-8