Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in men: a prospective randomized trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The role of laparoscopic treatment in acute appendicitis still is unclear. Although some evidence in the literature suggests diagnostic benefits from laparoscopy for young women with suspected acute appendicitis, there is scepticism about the utility of this approach for men. This study aimed to compare open and laparoscopic appendectomy performed for men with suspected acute appendicitis.

Methods

All male patients older than 15 years with an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification of 3 or less, no previous abdominal surgery, and no contraindication for pneumoperitoneum were prospectively randomized to undergo either open appendectomy (OA) or laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). The primary end point was a detected difference in postoperative hospital length of stay, and the secondary end points were detected differences in postoperative analgesia, morbidity, and length of the recovery period.

Results

In this study, 147 men with suspected acute appendicitis were randomized to either OA (n = 75) or LA (n = 72). It took longer to perform LA (60 min; range, 20–120 min vs. 45 min; range, 20–90 min; p = 0.0027), and LA did not result in any significant difference for the parameters evaluated.

Conclusion

The postoperative length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between OA and LA for men. Laparoscopic appendectomy required more time and did not offer any advantages compared with OA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks S, Pietrobon R (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ignacio RC, Burke R, Spencer D, Bissell C, Dorsainvil C, Lucha PA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial. Surg Endosc 18:334–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mutter D, Vix M, Bui A, Evrard S, Tassetti V, Breton JF, Marescaux J (1996) Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study. Surgery 120:71–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J (1999) A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 177:250–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 91:17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Attwood SE, Hill AD, Murphy PG, Thornton J, Stephens RB (1992) A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Surgery 112:497–501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, Smith RW, Custer MD III, Harrison JB (1994) A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy. Ann Surg 219:728–731

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Smhirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 169:208–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J (1997) Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women. Surg Endosc 11:95–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tate JJ, Dawson JW, Chung SC, Lau WY, Li AK (1993) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 342:633–637

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin LC, Puente I, Sosa JL, Bassin A, Breslaw R, McKenney MG, Ginzburg E, Sleeman D (1995) Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized comparison. Ann Surg 222:256–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Henle K, Beller S, Rechner J, Zerz A, Szinicz G, Klinger A (1996) Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy: a prospective randomized study. Chirurg 67:526–530

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Minne L, Varner D, Burnell A, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W (1997) Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy: prospective randomized study of outcomes. Arch Surg 132:708–711

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Milewczyk M, Michalik M, Ciesielski M (2003) A prospective, randomized, unicenter study comparing laparoscopic and open treatments of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 17:1023–1028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2004) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD 001546

  16. Tzovaras G, Liakou P, Baloyiannis I, Spyridakis M, Mantzos F, Tepetes K, Athanassiou E, Hatzitheofilou C (2007) Laparoscopic appendectomy: differences between male and female patients with suspected acute appendicitis. World J Surg 31:409–413

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cox MR, McCall JL, Padbury RTA, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Toouli J (1995) Laparoscopic surgery in women with a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Med J Aust 162:130–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Larsson PG, Henriksson G, Olsson M, Boris J, Stroberg P, Tronstad SE, Skullman S (2001) Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women: a randomized study. Surg Endosc 15:200–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jadallah FA, Abdul-Ghani AA, Tibblin S (1994) Diagnostic laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomy in fertile women. Eur J Surg 160:41–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, Padbury RT, Wilson TG, Wattchow DA, Langcake M (1996) Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men. World J Surg 20:263–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olmi S, Magnone S, Bertolini A, Croce E (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 19:1193–1295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW, Mitchell P (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc 18:969–973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cueto J, D’Allemagne B, Vasquez-Frias JA, Gomez S, Delgado F, Trullenque L, Fajardo R, Valencia S, Poggi L, Balli J, Diaz J, Gonzalez R, Mansur JH, Franklin ME (2006) Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc 20:717–720

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

George Tzovaras, Ioannis Baloyiannis, Vassilios Kouritas, Dimitris Symeonidis, Michael Spyridakis, Antigoni Poultsidi, Konstantinos Tepetes, and Dimitris Zacharoulis have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, 411 10, Larissa, Greece

    George Tzovaras, Ioannis Baloyiannis, Vassilios Kouritas, Dimitris Symeonidis, Michael Spyridakis, Antigoni Poultsidi, Konstantinos Tepetes & Dimitris Zacharoulis

Authors
  1. George Tzovaras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ioannis Baloyiannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vassilios Kouritas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dimitris Symeonidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Spyridakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Antigoni Poultsidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Konstantinos Tepetes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dimitris Zacharoulis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Tzovaras.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tzovaras, G., Baloyiannis, I., Kouritas, V. et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in men: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 24, 2987–2992 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1160-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1160-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation