Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Single-site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison of short-term operative outcomes

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent developments in minimally invasive surgery have introduced scarless surgeries such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-site laparoscopic surgery. Among surgical procedures, the appendectomy is one of those targeted for early adoption of new minimally invasive surgical techniques. To date, however, only a limited number of case series have been reported. Thus, the current study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-site laparoscopic appendectomy (SSLA) compared with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA).

Methods

The study enrolled 43 patients who consecutively received laparoscopic appendectomy and divided them into SSLA and CLA groups. The clinical characteristics and short-term operative outcomes of these patients were reviewed and compared.

Results

The 23 patients receiving SSLA did not differ from the 20 patients receiving CLA in terms of clinical characteristics including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), location of appendix, and severity of inflammation. Likewise, operation times and postoperative complication rates did not differ between the two groups. Short-term operative outcomes such as visual analog pain score and hospital stay were not different. The incision was shorter for SSLA (22.9 ± 3.9 mm) than for CLA (29.0 ± 3.0 mm) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The results of the current study suggest that SSLA is a feasible surgical alternative to CLA with an equivalent level of safety. The data also suggest that SSLA results in better cosmetic outcomes than CLA. Data from larger research studies are necessary to confirm these results and validate the use of SSLA over CLA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rao PP, Bhagwat SM, Rane A (2008) The feasibility of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a pilot study of 20 cases. HPB Oxford 10:336–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kroh M, Rosenblatt S (2009) Single-port, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and inguinal hernia repair: first clinical report of a new device. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:215–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N, Ostermann S, Charara F, Morel P (2009) Single-port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). World J Surg 33:1015–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D (2002) Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 225:400–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wheeless CR (1972) Elimination of second incision in laparoscopic sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 39:134–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuon Lee S, You YK, Park JH, Kim H-J, Lee KK, Kim DG (2009) Single-port transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a preliminary study in 37 patients with gallbladder disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 19:495–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong TH, Kim HL, Lee YS, Kim JJ, Lee KH, You YK, Oh SJ, Park SM (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA): scarless intracorporeal appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 19:75–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chow A, Purkayastha S, Paraskeva P (2009) Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience. Surg Innovation 16:211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tai H, Lin C, Wu C, Tsai Y, Yang S (2009) Homemade transumbilical port: an alternative access for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS). Surg Endosc

  10. Park YH, Kang MY, Jeong MS, Choi H, Kim HH (2009) Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy using a homemade single-port device for single-system ectopic ureter in a child: initial case report. J Endourol 23:833–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue H, Takeshita K, Endo M (1994) Single-port laparoscopy-assisted appendectomy under local pneumoperitoneum condition. Surg Endosc 8:714–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roberts KE (2009) True single-port appendectomy: first experience with the “puppeteer technique”. Surg Endosc 23:1825–1830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Min-Soo Cho, Byung Soh Min, Young-Ki Hong, and Woo-Jung Lee have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno Seodaemungu, 120-752, Seoul, Korea (South)

    Min-Soo Cho, Byung Soh Min, Young-Ki Hong & Woo-Jung Lee

Authors
  1. Min-Soo Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Byung Soh Min
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Young-Ki Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Woo-Jung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung Soh Min.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, MS., Min, B.S., Hong, YK. et al. Single-site versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: comparison of short-term operative outcomes. Surg Endosc 25, 36–40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1124-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1124-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation