Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sex differences in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy may not be desirable due to the increased complication rate and prolonged convalescence. In Denmark, nationwide data show that 7.7% of the laparoscopic cholecystectomies are converted to open surgery. This article aims to document the relationship of gender to conversion rate and length of hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a national cohort of patients.

Methods

The gender of 5,951 patients from the 2007 National Danish Cholecystectomy Database was compared with conversion rate, length of hospital stay, and various risk factors using multivariate analyses.

Results

The findings showed that 14.3% of the patients had acute cholecystitis and that men had the highest risk (odds ratio [OR], 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66–2.27). The operative findings for the men included sequelae from previous acute cholecystitis more frequently than the findings for the women (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.67–2.15). The rate for conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was 7.7%, and male sex was highly associated with conversion (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 2.04–3.01). Thus, 259 (5.8%) of the 4,451 operations for women were converted to laparotomy compared with 199 (13.3%) of the 1,500 operations for men. No significant sex differences were found in the proportion of bile duct lesions (those requiring reconstructive surgery as well as those that could be handled by endoscopy or T-tube drainage, suturing, or both) or in the 30-day mortality rate. The multivariate analyses showed that male sex was a significant factor for conversion but not for length of postoperative stay or readmission.

Conclusion

Men showed a significantly higher risk of the operation being converted from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy than women (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 2.04–3.01). The main reason for this may be that men more frequently had acute cholecystitis or sequelae from previous acute cholecystitis. These results can be used to give patients a better basis for their informed consent and better resource management in connection with the operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ainsworth A, Adamsen S, Rosenberg J (2005) Kolecystektomi i Danmark 1989–2003. Ugeskr Læger 167:2648–2650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Keus F, de Jong JAF, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJHM (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD006231

  3. Dansk Galde Database Årsrapport 2006 (2007). Retrieved November 2008 at http://kliniskedatabaser.dk/artikeldataVis.asp?id=27&m=2

  4. Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Inderbitzin DT, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 203:723–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM (2009) Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 197:781–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Kristiansen V (2005) Dansk galde database–DGD. Ugeskr Læger 167:2618–2620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Harboe KM, Anthonsen K, Bardram L (2009) Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database. Int J Qual Health Care 21:160–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Galde Database Kliniske indikatorer. Retrieved November 2008 at http://kliniskedatabaser.dk/artikeldataVis.asp?id=27&m=2

  9. Dansk Galde Database Årsrapport 2007 (2008). Retrieved July 2009 at http://kliniskedatabaser.dk/artikeldataVis.asp?id=27&m=2

  10. Botaitis S, Polychronidis A, Pitiakoudis M, Perente S, Simopoulos C (2008) Does gender affect laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:157–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Russell JC, Walsh SJ, Reed-Fourquet L, Mattie A, Lynch J (1998) Symptomatic cholelithiasis: a different disease in men? Ann Surg 227:195–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kama NA, Kologlu M, Doganay M, Reis E, Atli M, Dolapci M (2001) A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 181:520–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zisman A, Gold-Deutch R, Zisman E, Negri M, Halpern Z, Lin G, Halevy A (1996) Is male gender a risk factor for conversion of laparoscopic into open cholecystectomy? Surg Endosc 10:892–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lipman JM, Claridge JA, Haridas M, Martin MD, Yao DC, Grimes KL, Malangoni MA (2007) Preoperative findings predict conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surgery 142:556–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibrahim S, Hean TK, Ho LS, Ravintharan T, Chye TN, Chee CH (2006) Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 30:1698–1704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang B, Cuschieri A (2006) Conversions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk factors and effects on patient outcome. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1081–1091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee HK, Han HS, Min SK, Lee JH (2005) Sex-based analysis of the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br J Surg 92:463–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gharaibeh KIA, Qasaimeh GR, Al-Heiss H, Ammari F, Bani-Hani K, Al-Jaberi TM, Al-Natour S (2002) Effect of timing of surgery, tape of inflammation, and sex on outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12:193–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J (2002) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 184:254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bingener-Casey J, Richards ML, Strodel WE, Schwesinger WH, Sirinek KR (2002) Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10-year review. J Gastrointest Surg 6:800–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Simopoulos C, Botaitis S, Polychronidis A, Tripsianis G, Karayiannakis AJ (2005) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19:905–909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bickel A, Rappaport A, Kanievski V, Vaksman I, Haj M, Geron N, Eitan A (1996) Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis: prognostic factors for success. Surg Endosc 10:1045–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Teixeira JPA, Saraiva AC, Cabral AC, Barros H, Reis JR, Teixeira A (2000) Conversion factors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Hepatogastroenterology 47:626–630

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yol S, Kartal A, Vatansev C, Aksoy F, Toy H (2006) Sex as a factor in conversion from laparoscopic cholecystetomy to open surgery. JSLS 10:359–363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Simon E. Thesbjerg, Kirstine M. Harboe, Linda Bardram, and Jacob Rosenberg have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Simon E. Thesbjerg & Jacob Rosenberg

  2. Department of Surgery, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Kirstine M. Harboe

  3. Department of Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Danish Cholecystectomy Database, Hvidovre, Denmark

    Linda Bardram

Authors
  1. Simon E. Thesbjerg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kirstine M. Harboe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda Bardram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jacob Rosenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon E. Thesbjerg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thesbjerg, S.E., Harboe, K.M., Bardram, L. et al. Sex differences in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 24, 3068–3072 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1091-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1091-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation