Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accuracy of colonoscopic localization

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of preoperative colonoscopic localization of colonic lesions. Localization of the colonic lesion plays a key role in determining the type of operation a patient may require. Inaccurate localization may result in removal of the wrong segment of colon and/or a change in the operation performed.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who had a colon resection by a single surgeon after preoperative colonoscopic localization between 1991 and 2008 was performed. A comparison of the preoperative colonoscopic localization and the final intraoperative localization was made. Clinical and demographic information was gathered to determine accuracy rates and identify predictive factors.

Results

Three hundred and seventy-four patients were included and 184 (49%) were male. The mean age was 61.6 years. Three hundred and sixty-two (97%) patients underwent colon resection for cancer. Fifteen (4%) patients had nonconcordant colonoscopic and intraoperative findings. Fourteen of the 15 (93%) were resected for cancer and 1 for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Seven (47%) lesions were inaccurately localized in the sigmoid colon, four (27%) in the descending colon, two (13%) in the ascending colon, one (7%) in the rectum, and one (7%) lesion was not visualized preoperatively. Eleven of the 15 (73%) patients with nonconcordant localization had a modification of their planned procedure. Ten patients underwent a different segmental colectomy and one patient had an extended resection.

Conclusion

Preoperative colonoscopic localization of colorectal lesions was reasonably accurate (96%) in this large series. The majority of inaccurately identified lesions occurred in the sigmoid and descending colon. Erroneous localization, even though not common, can result in significant changes in the intraoperative plan and the ultimate outcome. Therefore, every effort should be made to localize the lesion before surgery, especially when thought to be in the left or sigmoid colon, to reduce the need for intraoperative localization efforts, the need for an intraoperative change in procedure, and the risk of a surprise for the patient after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Colon and Rectal Cancer. Available at http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/colon-and-rectal. Accessed 20 September 2009

  2. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA, Burt RW, Sonnenberg A (2000) Colorectal cancer prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 95(4):868–877

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, O’Brien MJ, Gottlieb LS, Sternberg SS, Waye JD, Schapiro M, Bond JH, Panish JF, Ackroyd F, Shike M, Kurtz RC, Hornsby-Lewis L, Gerdes H, Stewart ET (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329(27):1977–1981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vignati P, Welch JP, Cohen JL (1994) Endoscopic localization of colon cancers. Surg Endosc 8(9):1085–1087

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T (2005) Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg 140(10):932–935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zmora O, Benjamin B, Reshef A, Neufeld D, Rosin D, Klein E, Ayalon A, Shpitz B (2009) Laparoscopic colectomy for colonic polyps. Surg Endosc 23(3):629–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Montorsi M, Opocher E, Santambrogio R, Bianchi P, Faranda C, Arcidiacono P, Passoni GR, Cosentino F (1999) Original technique for small colorectal tumor localization during laparoscopic surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 42(6):819–822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cho YB, Lee WY, Yun HR, Lee WS, Yun SH, Chun HK (2007) Tumor localization for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Surg 31(7):1491–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feingold DL, Addona T, Forde KA, Arnell TD, Carter JJ, Huang EH, Whelan RL (2004) Safety and reliability of tattooing colorectal neoplasms prior to laparoscopic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 8(5):543–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schoellhammer HF, Gregorian AC, Sarkisyan GG, Petrie BA (2008) How important is rigid proctosigmoidoscopy in localizing rectal cancer? Am J Surg 196(6):904–908; discussion 908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Vaziri and Orkin and Ms. Choxi have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, The George Washington University Medical Center, 2150 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Suite 6B, Washington, DC, 20037, USA

    Khashayar Vaziri & Sarah C. Choxi

  2. Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 02111, USA

    Bruce A. Orkin

Authors
  1. Khashayar Vaziri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah C. Choxi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bruce A. Orkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khashayar Vaziri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaziri, K., Choxi, S.C. & Orkin, B.A. Accuracy of colonoscopic localization. Surg Endosc 24, 2502–2505 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0993-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0993-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation