Skip to main content
Log in

Development and testing of a tethered, independent camera for NOTES and single-site laparoscopic procedures

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

“Tunnel vision” associated with endoscopes used in NOTES and laparoscopes used in laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures present the surgeon with a disorienting view of familiar surroundings. Given the in-line arrangement of the devices, it is difficult to achieve adequate triangulation, a critical component of successful surgical technique. A potentially more useful vantage point would be from above, looking down at the surgical field, i.e., “stadium view.” The purpose of this study was to develop stadium-view camera prototypes for evaluation.

Methods

Cylindrical (15 mm diameter, 30 mm length) imagers were built using white light LEDs for illumination and a near-VGA resolution CMOS camera. These prototypes were delivered to the abdominal cavity through an overtube (Steerable Flex Trocar (SFT)); the electronic tether for power and video signal was pulled through the abdominal wall using a 2-mm rigid grasper. The prototypes were attracted to the abdominal wall magnetically. Clinicians performed the procedures in IACUC/Home Office-approved porcine labs.

Results

Introduction of the device into the peritoneal cavity and magnetic coupling to the abdominal wall were straightforward. Illumination was adequate to provide reasonable imagery of nearby abdominal organs. Bowel was successfully sutured laparoscopically under visualization provided by the prototype. All points on the abdominal wall could be reached via the magnetic control, and the camera could be successfully aimed through abdominal palpation. Retrieval was uncomplicated.

Conclusions

The prototypes provide the clinician a point of view similar to that of a traditional laparoscope, although the image quality needs improvement. The stadium view helps to overcome limitations associated with in-line visualization and working tools. Use of such a camera in NOTES or LESS could enable reduction of the number/size of ancillary trocars, reduce the size of the LESS port, and/or increase the number of working devices that can be deployed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV (2004) Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 60:114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB, Reavis KM, Paul CM, Hinshaw KE, Muscarella P, Ellison EC, Melvin WS (2008) Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc 22:16–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernhardt J, Gerber B, Schober HC, Kähler G, Ludwig K (2008) NOTES—case report of a unidirectional flexible appendectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:547–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Palanivelu C, Rajan PS, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R, Senthilnathan P, Prasad M (2008) Transvaginal endoscopic appendectomy in humans: a unique approach to NOTES—world’s first report. Surg Endosc 22:1343–1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D (2007) Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 142:823–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zorron R, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Oliveira AL, Carvalho GL, Filgueiras M (2008) NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application. Surg Endosc 22:542–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Auyang ED, Hungness ES, Vaziri K, Martin JA, Soper NJ (2009) Human NOTES cholecystectomy: transgastric hybrid technique. J Gastrointest Surg. doi:10.1007/s11605-009-0813-y, Feb 7, 2009

  8. Ramos AC, Zundel N, Neto MG, Maalouf M (2008) Human hybrid NOTES transvaginal sleeve gastrectomy: initial experience. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:660–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gumbs AA, Milone L, Sinha P, Bessler M (2009) Totally transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:533–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Piskun G, Rajpal S (1999) Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy utilizes no incisions outside the umbilicus. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:361–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inoue H, Takeshita K, Endo M (1994) Single-port laparoscopy assisted appendectomy under local pneumoperitoneum condition. Surg Endosc 8:714–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao MM, Rao RK (2004) Two-port and single port laparoscopic appendicectomy. J Indian Med Assoc 102:360, 362, 364

    Google Scholar 

  13. Castellucci SA, Curcillo PG, Ginsberg PC, Saba SC, Jaffe JS, Harmon JD (2008) Single port access adrenalectomy. J Endourol 22:1573–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Reavis KM (2008) Single laparoscopic incision transabdominal (SLIT) surgery-adjustable gastric banding: a novel minimally invasive surgical approach. Obes Surg 18:1628–1631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aron M, Canes D, Desai MM, Haber GP, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2009) Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 103:516–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Desai MM, Gill IS (2008) Single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 72:1190–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kommu SS, Rané A (2009) Devices for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology. Expert Rev Med Devices 6:95–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rattner D, Kalloo A, ASGE/SAGES Working Group (2005) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20(October):329–333

    Google Scholar 

  20. Swanstrom L, Zheng B (2008) Spatial orientation and off-axis challenges for NOTES. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 18:315–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carswell CM, Clarke D, Seales WB (2005) Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 12:80–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raman JD, Scott DJ, Cadeddu JA (2009) Role of magnetic anchors during laparoendoscopic single site surgery and NOTES. J Endourol 23(5):781–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dave Plescia (EES), Optimum Technologies, Inc., and the preclinical staffs at the Royal Veterinary College, London, UK, and Ethicon Endo-Surgery Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio for their support in this study.

Disclaimer

The tethered, independent, cameras, 2-mm trocars, Rotating Access Needle and Steerable Flex Trocar used in this study are not yet approved by the FDA for use in humans.

Disclosures

Drs. C. Paul Swain and Ralph Austin are consultants for Ethicon Endo-Surgery. Robert Trusty and Kurt Bally are employees of Ethicon Endo-Surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kurt Bally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swain, P., Austin, R., Bally, K. et al. Development and testing of a tethered, independent camera for NOTES and single-site laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 24, 2013–2021 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0897-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0897-1

Keywords

Navigation