Abstract
Introduction
Mental workload is a finite resource and is increased while learning new tasks and performing complex tasks. Measurement of a surgeon’s mental workload may therefore be an indication of expertise. We hypothesized that surgeons who were expert at laparoscopic suturing would have more spare mental resources to perform a secondary task, compared with surgeons who had just started to learn suturing.
Methods
Standardized suturing tasks were performed on a bench-top model. Twelve junior residents (novices) and nine fellows and attending surgeons (experts) were instructed to perform as many sutures as possible in 6 min. An adjacent monitor was placed 15° off axis to the first and randomly displayed 30 true visual signals among 90 false ones. Participants were required to identify the true signals while continuing to suture. Laparoscopic sutures were evaluated using the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) scoring system. The secondary (visual detection) task was evaluated by calculating the rate of missed true signals or detection of false signals.
Results
Experts completed significantly more secure sutures (6 ± 2) than novices (3 ± 1; p = 0.001). The suture performance score was 50 ± 20 for experts, significantly higher than for novices (29 ± 10; p = 0.005). The rate for detecting visual signals was higher for experts (98%) compared with for novices (93%; p = 0.041).
Conclusion
Practice develops automaticity, which reduces the mental workload and allows surgeons to have sufficient spare mental resources to attend to a secondary task. Visual detection provides a simple and reliable way to assess mental workload and situation awareness abilities of surgeons during skills training, and may be an indirect measure of expertise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berguer R, Chen J, Smith WD (2003) A comparison of the physical effort required for laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Arch Surg 138:967–970
Berguer R, Forkey DL, Smith WD (2001) The effect of laparoscopic instrument working angle on surgeons’ upper extremity workload. Surg Endosc 15:1027–1029
Berguer R, Gerber S, Kilpatrick G, Remler M, Beckley D (1999) A comparison of forearm and thumb muscle electromyographic responses to the use of laparoscopic instruments with either a finger grasp or a palm grasp. Ergonomics 42:1634–1645
Keehner MM, Tendick F, Meng MV et al (2004) Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. Am J Surg 188:71–75
Cuschieri A (1995) Visual displays and visual perception in minimal access surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg 13:209–214
Aggarwal R, Hance J, Undre S et al (2006) Training junior operative residents in laparoscopic suturing skills is feasible and efficacious. Surgery 139:729–734
Dubrowski A, Park J, Moulton CA, Larmer J, MacRae H (2007) A comparison of single- and multiple-stage approaches to teaching laparoscopic suturing. Am J Surg 193:269–273
Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ (2005) Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg 201:23–29
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bello F, Chang A, Darzi A (2004) Bimodal assessment of laparoscopic suturing skills: construct and concurrent validity. Surg Endosc 18:1608–1612
Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15:1204–1207
Weinger MB, Reddy SB, Slagle JM (2004) Multiple measures of anesthesia workload during teaching and nonteaching cases. Anesth Analg 98:1419–1425 (table of contents)
Klein MI, Warm JS, Riley MA, Matthews G, Gaitonde K, Donovan JF (2008) Perceptual distortions produce multidimensional stress profiles in novice users of an endoscopic surgery simulator. Hum Factors 50:291–300
Carswell CM, Clarke D, Seales WB (2005) Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 12:80–90
Cao CG (2007) Guiding navigation in colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 21:480–484
O’Connor A, Schwaitzberg SD, Cao CG (2007) How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture? Surg Endosc 22:1614–1619
Norman DA, Bobrow DG (1975) On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cogn Psychol 7:44–64
Wickens CD (1984) Processing resources in attention. In: Parasuraman R, Davies DR (eds) Varieties of attention. Academic Press, New York, pp 63–102
Wickens CD (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 3:159–177
Emam TA, Hanna G, Cuschieri A (2002) Ergonomic principles of task alignment, visual display, and direction of execution of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Surg Endosc 16:267–271
Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1999) Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance. Surg Endosc 13:371–375
Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (2000) Influence of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging on endoscopic bowel suturing. World J Surg 24:444–448 discussion 448-9
Bholat OS, Haluck RS, Murray WB, Gorman PJ, Krummel TM (1999) Tactile feedback is present during minimally invasive surgery. J Am Coll Surg 189:349–355
Stefanidis D, Scerbo MW, Korndorffer JR Jr, Scott DJ (2007) Redefining simulator proficiency using automaticity theory. Am J Surg 193:502–506
Marteniuk RG (1976) Information processing in motor skills. Holt Rinehart and Winston, New York
Acknowledgement
This project was supported by NOSCAR® Research Grants, a joint initiative supported by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, B., Cassera, M.A., Martinec, D.V. et al. Measuring mental workload during the performance of advanced laparoscopic tasks. Surg Endosc 24, 45–50 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0522-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0522-3