Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative staging of patients with rectal tumors suitable for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): comparison of endorectal ultrasound and histopathologic findings

  • Endoluminal
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Accurate preoperative staging is the key to correct selection of rectal tumors for local excision. This study aims to assess the accuracy of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) at our institution.

Patients and methods

Retrospective analysis was carried out of patients treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) from 1996 to 2008. TEM was considered the treatment of choice for uT0-1/N0 lesions located between 2 and 12 cm from the anal verge. It was also proposed in selected uT2-3 patients. Preoperative staging was compared with histopathologic findings.

Results

Eighty-one patients (46 males, mean age 66 years) underwent TEM. Mean distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 6.6 cm (range 2–12 cm). ERUS staged 15 of 27 adenomas (55%) as uT1. Of 54 carcinomas, 5 were pT0 because TEM was performed to remove resection margins of a malign polyp already snared. Five of 19 pTis (26%) were overstaged uT1, while 7 of 17 pT1 (41%) were understaged. Overall, ERUS enabled distinction between early and advanced rectal lesion with 96% sensitivity and 85% specificity, giving accuracy of 94% (65/67). Thirteen patients had advanced lesions (eight pT2 and five pT3). Only in two of them (15%) was depth of invasion underestimated by ERUS (one uT0, one uT1) and thus was subsequent salvage surgery necessary.

Conclusions

ERUS is useful to confirm the diagnosis of adenoma and predict depth of mural invasion in early rectal cancer. Differentiation between T0/is and T1 lesions remains challenging, however this does not usually influence surgical strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Middleton PF, Sutherland LM, Maddern GJ (2005) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 48:270–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stipa F, Burza A, Lucandri G, Ferri M, Piazzi A, Ziparo V, Casula G, Stipa S (2006) Outcome of early rectal cancer patients managed with TEM. A 5 years’ follow up study. Surg Endosc 20:541–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicholls J (2007) Local excision of rectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis 9:771–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duek SD, Issa N, Hershko DD, Krausz MM (2008) Outcome of transanal endoscopic microsurgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with T2 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 51:379–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mellgren A, Sirivongs P, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD, García-Aguilar J (2000) Is local excision adequate therapy for early rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 43:1064–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buess G, Theiss R, Hutterer F, Pichlmaier H, Pelz C, Holfeld T, Said S, Isselhard W (1983) Transanal endoscopic surgery of the rectum—testing a new method in animal experiments. Leber Magen Darm 13:73–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buess G, Theiss R, Günther M, Hutterer F, Pichlmaier H (1985) Endoscopic surgery in the rectum. Endoscopy 17:31–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ikeda Y, Mori M, Abe T, Koyonagi N, Akahoshi K (1999) Indications for performing transanal endoscopic microsurgery in rectal cancer patients. Colorectal Dis 2:13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doornebosch PG, Bronkhorst PJB, Hop WCJ, Bode WA, Sing AK, de Graaf EJR (2008) The role of ERUS in therapeutic decision-making for local vs. transabdominal resection of rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 51:38–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Langer C, Liersch T, Suss M, Siemer A, Markus P, Ghadimi BM, Füzesi L, Becker H (2003) Surgical cure for early rectal carcinoma and large adenoma: transanal endoscopic microsurgery (using ultrasound or electrosurgery) compared to conventional local and radical resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 18:222–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. De Graaf EJ (2003) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Scand J Gastroenterology 239:34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lezoche E, Guerrieri M, Paganini AM, Baldarelli A, De Sanctis A, Lezoche G (2005) Long term results in patients with T2-3 N0 distal rectal cancer undergoing radiotherapy before transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Br J Surg 12:1546–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kikuchi R, Takano M, Takagi K, Fujimoto N, Nozaki R, Fujiyoshi T, Uchida Y (1995) Management of early invasive colorectal cancer. Risk of recurrence and clinical guidelines. Dis Colon Rectum 38:1286–1295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maslekar S, Pillinger SH, Monson JRT (2007) Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc 21:97–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stipa F, Ferri M, Lucandri G, Casula G, Ziparo V (2004) Local excision of rectal cancer with transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Anticancer Res 24:1167–1172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hildebrandt U, Feifel G, Schwarz HP, Scherr O (1986) Endorectal ultrasound: instrumentation and clinical aspects. Int J Colorectal Dis 1 4:203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th edn. Wiley

  18. Adams DR, Blatchford GJ, Lin KM, Ternent CA, Thorson AG (1999) Use of preoperative ERUS staging for treatment of rectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 42:159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Garcia-Aguilar J, Pollack J, Lee S, Hernandez de Anda E, Mellgren A, Wong W, Finne C, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD (2002) Accuracy of ERUS in preoperative staging of rectal tumors. Dis Colon Rectum 45:10–15

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hildebrandt U, Schuder G, Feifel G (1994) Preoperative staging of rectal and colonic cancer. Endoscopy 26:810–812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Glancy DG, Pullyblank AM, Thomas MG (2005) The role of colonoscopic endoanal ultrasound scanning (EUS) in selecting patients suitable for resection by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Colorectal Dis 7:148–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gualdi GF, Casciani E, Guadalaxara A, d’Orta C, Polettim E, Pappalardo G (2000) Local staging of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with histologic findings. Dis Colon Rectum 43:338–345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zagoria RJ, Schlarb CA, Ott DJ, Bechtold RI, Wolfman NT, Scharling ES, Chen MY, Loggie BW (1997) Assessment of rectal tumor infiltration utilizing endorectal MR imaging and comparing with endoscopic rectal sonorography. J Surg Oncol 64:312–317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maldjian C, Smith R, Kilger A, Schnall M, Ginsberg G, Kochman M (2000) Endorectal surface coil MR imaging as a staging technique for rectal carcinoma: a comparison study to rectal endosonorography. Abdom Imaging 25:75–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown G, Richards CJ, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Radcliffe AG, Carey DP, Bourne MW, Williams GT (1999) Rectal carcinoma. Thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients. Radiology 211:215–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, Kessels AG, Van Boven H, De Bruine A, von Meyenfeldt MF, Baeten CG, van Engelshoven JM (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357:497–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Dallimore NS, Williams GT (2003) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution MRI. Br J Surg 90:355–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim NK, Kim MJ, Yun SH, Min JS (1999) Comparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic CT and MRI in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 42:770–775

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ho-Kyung C, Dongil C, Min JK, Jongmee L, Seong HY, Seung HK, Soon JL, Chan KK (2006) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography. Gastrointest Imaging 187:1557–1562

    Google Scholar 

  30. Iafrate F, Laghi A, Paolantonio P, Rengo M, Mercantini P, Ferri M, Ziparo V, Passariello R (2006) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer with MR imaging: correlation with surgical and histopathologic findings. Radiographics 26:701–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Herzog U, von Flue M, Tondelli P, Schuppisser JP (1993) How accurate is endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 36:127–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Akasu T, Sugihara K, Moriya Y, Fujita S (1997) Limitations and pitfalls of transrectal ultrasonorography for staging of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 40:10–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kwok H, Bisset IP, Hill GL (2000) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 15:9–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tio TL, Coene PP, van Delden OM, Tyagat GN (1991) Colorectal carcinoma: preoperative TNM classification with endosonorography. Radiology 179:165–170

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Guinet C, Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Sézeur A, Mallet A, Bigot JM, Vadrot D, Ecoiffier J (1990) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Arch Surg 125:385–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Chalmers AG, Chennells P, Dixon MF, Finan PJ, Primrose JN, Quirke P (1988) Endoluminal ultrasound and computed tomography in the staging of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 75:1019–1022

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. McNicholas MM, Joyce WP, Dolan J, Gibney RG, MacErlaine DP, Hyland J (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal carcinoma: a prospective study. Br J Surg 81:911–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hermanek P (1994) Lokale Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  39. Haggitt R, Glotzbach RE, Softer EE, Wruble LD (1985) Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer in adenomas; implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 89:328–336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tytherleigh MG, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ (2008) Management of early rectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:409–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (2007) Guidelines for the Management of Colorectal Cancer (3rd edn). http://www.acpgbi.org.uk/assets/documents/COLO_guides.pdf

  42. Chambers W, Khan U, Gagliano A, Smith RD, Sheffield J, Nicholls RJ (2004) Tumour morphology as a predictor of outcome after local excision of rectal cancer. Br J Sur 91:457–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Zorcolo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zorcolo, L., Fantola, G., Cabras, F. et al. Preoperative staging of patients with rectal tumors suitable for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): comparison of endorectal ultrasound and histopathologic findings. Surg Endosc 23, 1384–1389 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0349-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0349-y

Keywords

Navigation