Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Maximizing the donor pool: use of right kidneys and kidneys with multiple arteries for live donor transplantation

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Studies have shown donor and recipient outcomes to be equivalent for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) and open donor nephrectomy. In the past, LDN has been avoided in the procurement of the right kidney or organs with multiple arteries. This study compares procurement of right and left kidneys as well as procurement of single- and multiple artery organs.

Methods

A review of all LDNs at a single institution between August 2000 and December 2007 was performed. The data included estimated blood loss (EBL), need for transfusion, operative time, warm ischemia time, length of hospital stay (LOS), and delayed graft function. Arterial supply was assessed using renal arteriogram or computed tomographic (CT) angiography. Outcomes for multiple versus single artery and left versus right LDN were compared. Student’s t-test and chi-square test were used for statistical comparison.

Results

A total of 230 LDNs were performed. Multiple arteries were present in 37 donors. The right kidney was procured from 36 donors. No significant difference in EBL, transfusions, operative time, or LOS was noted between multiple and single or right and left LDNs. Warm ischemia time was significantly longer for multiple arteries (mean, 83 s) than for single arteries (mean, 63 s; p = 0.007), and for right kidneys (mean, 86 s) than for left kidneys (mean, 62 s; p = 0.001). No significant difference in delayed graft function was seen in the comparison of multiple (21.6%) and single (11.4%) artery organs (p = 0.11) or of right (13.9%) and left (12.9%) kidneys (p = 0.79).

Conclusions

The presence of multiple arteries or the need to procure the right kidney does not affect the operative outcome of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Warm ischemia time may be greater for these groups, but this does not result in delayed allograft function. The laparoscopic approach should be the standard of care even when expansion of the donor pool includes organs with multiple arteries and procurement of the right kidney.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047–1049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (2007) http://www.optn/latestData/rptData.asp, vol 2008, UNOS

  3. Nanidis TG, Antcliffe D, Kokkinos C, Borysiewicz CA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, Papalois VE (2008) Laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg 247:58–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kercher KW, Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Smith TI, Lincourt AE, Hayes DH, Eskind LB, Irby PB, Teigland CM (2003) Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns. Surg Endosc 17:1889–1895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, Phelan MW, Kristo B, Gritsch AH, Rajfer J, Schulam PG (2003) Quality of life, pain, and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 169:2018–2021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV (2003) Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transplant 3:1295–1301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Del Pizzo JJ, Sklar GN, You-Cheong JW, Levin B, Krebs T, Jacobs SC (1999) Helical computerized tomography arteriography for evaluation of live renal donors undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 162:31–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhatti AA, Chugtai A, Haslam P, Talbot D, Rix DA, Soomro NA (2005) Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors. BJU Int 96:1105–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Troppmann C, Wiesmann K, McVicar JP, Wolfe BM, Perez RV (2001) Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era: surgical technique and surgical and nonsurgical donor and recipient outcomes. Arch Surg 136:897–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuo PC, Cho ES, Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Bartlett ST, Johnson LB (1998) Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and multiple renal arteries. Am J Surg 176:559–563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu TH, Su LM, Ratner LE, Trock BJ, Kavoussi LR (2003) Impact of renal artery multiplicity on outcomes of renal donors and recipients in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 61:323–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter JT, Freise CE, McTaggart RA, Mahanty HD, Kang SM, Chan SH, Feng S, Roberts JP, Posselt AM (2005) Laparoscopic procurement of kidneys with multiple renal arteries is associated with increased ureteral complications in the recipient. Am J Transplant 5:1312–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Breda A, Veale J, Liao J, Schulam PG (2007) Complications of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and their management: the UCLA experience. Urology 69:49–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buzdon MM, Cho E, Jacobs SC, Jarrell B, Flowers JL (2003) Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 17:746–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meng MV, Freise CE, Kang SM, Duh QY, Stoller ML (2003) Techniques to optimize vascular control during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 61:93–97; discussion 97–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Woodle ES (2003) Maximizing renal artery length in right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy by retrocaval exposure of the aortorenal junction. Transplantation 75:83–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buell JF, Edye M, Johnson M, Li C, Koffron A, Cho E, Kuo P, Johnson L, Hanaway M, Potter SR, Bruce DS, Cronin DC, Newell KA, Leventhal J, Jacobs S, Woodle ES, Bartlett ST, Flowers JL (2001) Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted? Ann Surg 233:645–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Swartz DE, Cho E, Flowers JL, Dunkin BJ, Ramey JR, Bartlett ST, Jarrell B, Jacobs SC (2001) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: technique and comparison with left nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 15:1390–1394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Posselt AM, Mahanty H, Kang SM, Stoller ML, Meng MV, Roberts JP, Freise CE (2004) Laparoscopic right donor nephrectomy: a large single-center experience. Transplantation 78:1665–1669

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Husted TL, Hanaway MJ, Thomas MJ, Woodle ES, Buell JF (2005) Laparoscopic right living donor nephrectomy. Transplant Proc 37:631–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lind MY, Hazebroek EJ, Hop WC, Weimar W, Jaap Bonjer H, IJ JN (2002) Right-sided laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy: is reluctance still justified? Transplantation 74:1045–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to H. James Norton, PhD, for his continued support of their research efforts through statistical analysis of data related to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 Blythe Blvd, MEB #601, Charlotte, NC, 28203, USA

    Jennifer E. Keller, Charles J. Dolce, Daniel Griffin, B. Todd Heniford & Kent W. Kercher

Authors
  1. Jennifer E. Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charles J. Dolce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Griffin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Todd Heniford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kent W. Kercher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kent W. Kercher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, J.E., Dolce, C.J., Griffin, D. et al. Maximizing the donor pool: use of right kidneys and kidneys with multiple arteries for live donor transplantation. Surg Endosc 23, 2327–2331 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0330-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0330-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation