Skip to main content
Log in

The frontal cortex is activated during learning of endoscopic procedures

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To date, several training and evaluation systems for endoscopic surgery have been developed, such as virtual-reality simulators and box trainers. However, despite current advances in these objective assessments, no functional brain studies during learning of endoscopic surgical skills have been carried out. In the present study, we investigated cortical activation using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) during endoscopic surgical tasks.

Study design

A total of 21 right-handed subjects, comprising 4 surgical experts, 4 trainees, and 13 novices, participated in the study. Suturing and knot-tying tasks were performed in a box trainer. Cortical activation was assessed in all subjects by task-related changes in hemoglobin (Hb) oxygenation using NIRS.

Results

In surgical experts and novices with no experience of endoscopic surgical training, we found no changes in oxy-Hb, deoxy-Hb or total-Hb levels in any of the frontal channels. In surgical trainees and one novice with experience of endoscopic surgical training, we found significant increases in oxy-Hb and total-Hb levels in most of the frontal channels. There were significant differences in oxy-Hb and total-Hb levels in CH-19 between surgical experts and trainees (p = 0.02 for both), and between surgical trainees and novices with no experience of endoscopic surgical training (p = 0.008 for both). Furthermore, additional training increased oxy-Hb levels in the frontal cortex of novices with no experience of endoscopic surgical training but had no such effect on surgical experts.

Conclusions

The present data suggest that NIRS is a feasible tool for assessing brain activation during endoscopic surgical tasks, and may have a large impact on the future development of teaching, training, and assessment methods for endoscopic surgical skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NIRS:

Near-infrared spectroscopy

Hb:

Hemoglobin

References

  1. Atkeson CG (1989) Learning arm kinematics and dynamics. Annu Rev Neurosci 12:157–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bermas H, Fenoglio M, Haun W, Moore JT (2004) Laparoscopic suturing and knot tying: a comparison of standard techniques to a mechanical assist device. JSLS 8:187–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Doyon J, Benali H (2005) Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:161–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gallagher AG, Lederman AB, McGlade K, Satava RM, Smith CD (2004) Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surg Endosc 18:660–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J (2003) Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 185:146–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Halsband U, Lange RK (2006) Motor learning in man: a review of functional and clinical studies. J Physiol Paris 99:414–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB, Rege RV, Laycock R, Bergen PC, Tesfay ST, Jones DB (2002) Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc 16:406–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hatakenaka M, Miyai I, Mihara M, Sakoda S, Kubota K (2007) Frontal regions involved in learning of motor skill-A functional NIRS study. Neuroimage 34:109–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hikosaka O, Nakamura K, Sakai K, Nakahara H (2002) Central mechanisms of motor skill learning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jaeger JJ, Lockwood AH, Van Valin RD Jr, Kemmerer DL, Murphy BW, Wack DS (1998) Sex differences in brain regions activated by grammatical and reading tasks. NeuroReport 9:2803–2807

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jordan JA, Gallagher AG, McGuigan J, McClure N (2001) Virtual reality training leads to faster adaptation to the novel psychomotor restrictions encountered by laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 15:1080–1084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly AM, Garavan H (2005) Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. Cereb Cortex 15:1089–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Larsson A (2001) Intracorporeal suturing and knot tying in surgical simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 81:266–271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Madan AK, Frantzides CT, Shervin N, Tebbit CL (2003) Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers. Am Surg 69:1112–1114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyai I, Tanabe HC, Sase I, Eda H, Oda I, Konishi I, Tsunazawa Y, Suzuki T, Yanagida T, Kubota K (2001) Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. Neuroimage 14:1186–1192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schreppel T, Egetemeir J, Schecklmann M et al (2008) Activation of the prefrontal cortex in working memory and interference resolution processes assessed with near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuropsychobiology 57:188–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schreppel TJ, Pauli P, Ellgring H, Fallgatter AJ, Herrmann MJ (2008) The impact of prefrontal cortex for selective attention in a visual working memory task. Int J Neurosci 118:1673–1688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18:485–494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen NT, Mayer KL, Bold RJ, Larson M, Foster S, Ho HS, Wolfe BM (2000) Laparoscopic suturing evaluation among surgical residents. J Surg Res 93:133–136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Pugh KR, Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Fulbright RK, Bronen RA, Fletcher JM, Shankweiler DP, Katz L, Gore CJ (1995) Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 373:607–609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Strom P, Kjellin A, Hedman L, Johnson E, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L (2003) Validation and learning in the Procedicus KSA virtual reality surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 17:227–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Suzuki M, Miyai I, Ono T, Oda I, Konishi I, Kochiyama T, Kubota K (2004) Prefrontal and premotor cortices are involved in adapting walking and running speed on the treadmill: an optical imaging study. Neuroimage 23:1020–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Szabo Z, Hunter J, Berci G, Sackier J, Cuschieri A (1994) Analysis of surgical movements during suturing in laparoscopy. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 2:55–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanoue K, Ieiri S, Konishi K, Yasunaga T, Okazaki K, Yamaguchi S, Yoshida D, Kakeji Y, Hashizume M (2008) Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery training for medical students using a virtual reality simulator versus a box trainer: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 22:985–990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vikingstad EM, George KP, Johnson AF, Cao Y (2000) Cortical language lateralization in right-handed normal subjects using functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurol Sci 175:17–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Makoto Hashizume.

Additional information

Supported in part by a grant from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ohuchida, K., Kenmotsu, H., Yamamoto, A. et al. The frontal cortex is activated during learning of endoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 23, 2296–2301 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0316-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0316-z

Keywords

Navigation