Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum versus standard pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized clinical trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Post-laparoscopic pain syndrome is well recognized and characterized by abdominal and particularly shoulder tip pain; it occurs frequently following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The etiology of post-laparoscopic pain can be classified into three aspects: visceral, incision, and shoulder. The origin of shoulder pain is only partly understood, but it is commonly assumed that the cause is overstretching of the diaphragmatic muscle fibers owing to a high rate of insufflations. This study aimed to compare the frequency and intensity of shoulder tip pain between low-pressure (7 mmHg) and standard-pressure (14 mmHg) in a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Methods

One hundred and forty consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized prospectively to either high- or low-pressure pneumoperitoneum and blinded by research nurses who assessed the patients during the postoperative period. The statistical analysis included sex, mean age, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, operative time, complication rate, duration of surgery, conversion rate, postoperative pain by using visual analogue scale, number of analgesic injections, incidence and severity of shoulder tip pain, and postoperative hospital stay. p < 0.05 was considered indicative of significance.

Results

The characteristics of the patients were similar in the two groups except for the predominance of males in the standard-pressure group (controls). The procedure was successful in 68 of 70 patients in the low-pressure group compared with in 70 patients in the standard group. Operative time, number of analgesic injections, visual analogue score, and length of postoperative days were similar in both groups. Incidence of shoulder tip pain was higher in the standard-pressure group, but not statistically significantly so (27.9% versus 44.3%) (p = 0.100).

Conclusions

Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum tended to be better than standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in terms of lower incidence of shoulder tip pain, but this difference did not reach statistical significance following elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander JL, Hull MGR (1987) Abdominal pain after laparoscopy: the value of a gas drain. Br J Obstet Gyn 94:267–269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chamberlain G (1984) The recovery of gases insufflated at laparoscopy. Br J Obstet Gyn 1:367–370

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsimoyiannis EC, Glantzounis G, Lekke ET, Siakas P, Jabaria M, Tszourou H (1998) Intraperitoneal normal saline and bupivacaine infusion for reduction of post-operative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparos Endos 8:416–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunniffe MG, Anena OJ, Dar MA, Calleary J, Flynn N (1998) A prospective randomized trial of intraoperative bupivacaine irrigation for management of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. Am J Surg 176:258–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace DH, Serpell MG, Bakter JN, O’ Dwyer PJ (1997) Randomized trial of different insufflation pressure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:455–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barczynski M, Herman RM (2003) A prospective randomized trial on comparison of low-pressure (LP) and standard pressure (SP) pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 17:533–538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pier A, Benedic M, Mann B, Buck V (1994) Das postlaparosko pische Schmerzsyndrom : Ergebnisre einer prospektiven, randomi sierten Studie. Chirurg 65:200–208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dexter SP, Vucevic M, Gibson J, McMahon MJ (1999) Hemodynamic consequence of high and low pressure capnoperitoneum during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endos 13:376–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandhu T (2003) Three port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 17:1434–1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H (1990) Coelioscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann Surg 211:60–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koivusalo AM, Lindgren L (1999) Respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 89:800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stuttmann R, Vogt C, Eypasch E, Doehn M (1995) Haemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the high risk patient. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 3:174–179

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kristiansen VB et al (1999) Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multi-modal analgesia, a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 89:1017–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, Weerts J, Lamy M (1995) Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intra peritoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 81:379–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ure BM, Troidl H, Spangenberger W et al (1994) Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intensity and localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative symptoms and intraoperative events. Surg Endosc 8:90–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Berberoglu M, Dilex ON, Ercan F, Kati I, Ozmen M (1998) The effect of CO2 insufflation rate on the postlaparoscopic shoulder pain. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 8:273–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sarli L, Costi R, Sansebastiano G, Trirelli M, Roncoroni L (2000) Prospective randomized trial of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum for reduction of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. Br J Surg 87:1161–1165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sood J, Jayaraman L, Kumra VP, Chowbey PK (2006) Laparoscopic approach to pheochromocytoma: is a lower intraabdominal pressure helpful? Anesth Analg 102(2):637–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Beebe DS, Zhu S, Kumar MV et al (2002) The effect of insufflation pressure on CO2 pneumoperitoneum and embolism in piglets. Anesth Analg 94(5):1182–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwarte LA, Scheeren TW, Lorenz C, De Bruyne F, Fournell A (2004) Moderate increase intraabdominal pressure attenuates gastric mucosal oxygen saturation in patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology 100(5):1081–1087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E et al (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand

    Trichak Sandhu, Sirikan Yamada, Veeravorn Ariyakachon, Thiraphat Chakrabandhu, Wilaiwan Chongruksut & Wasana Ko-iam

Authors
  1. Trichak Sandhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sirikan Yamada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Veeravorn Ariyakachon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thiraphat Chakrabandhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wilaiwan Chongruksut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wasana Ko-iam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trichak Sandhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandhu, T., Yamada, S., Ariyakachon, V. et al. Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum versus standard pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 23, 1044–1047 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0119-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0119-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation