Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic management of distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The traditional management of hydrocephalus still is the placement of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts. However, the majority of patients require one or more revisions over their lifetime. Revisions may be required for infections, proximal site malfunction, or distal catheter complications. The authors present their experience with distal catheter complications managed laparoscopically.

Methods

Patients with recurrent symptoms of increased intracranial pressure or abdominal complaints were evaluated for shunt malfunction. Similar radiographic imaging was performed for all the patients, including computed tomography (CT) of the head and abdomen, shunt series, and/or ultrasound of the distal catheter.

Results

From April 2003 to July 2005, 13 patients with distal VP shunt complications were managed laparoscopically. On the basis of preoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures, all the patients were determined not to have an infection. Radiographic imaging showed the patients to have distal catheter problems. Preoperatively, five abdominal CT scans, six shunt series, and four abdominal ultrasounds were obtained. All studies singly and positively identified the appropriate abdominal catheter defect except in three patients who required multiple sequential radiographic studies for final determination of the diagnosis. In four patients (30.8%), the distal catheter was found to be in the extraperitoneal space. Another four patients (30.8%) had intraabdominal CSF pseudocysts. Five patients (38.4%) had issues with the position of the intraabdominal catheter: four of them subdiaphragmatic and one on the dome of the bladder. Laparoscopic repositioning was successful for all 13 patients.

Conclusion

Regardless of the patient’s presenting symptoms, appropriate imaging studies should be obtained preoperatively in a sequential manner. Distal VP shunt complications can be safely and effectively managed laparoscopically. This approach allows the intraabdominal portion of the catheter to be assessed and problems to be managed, thereby salvaging the existing shunt and avoiding the potential morbidity associated with additional VP shunt placement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rizvi R, Anjum Q (2005) Hydrocephalus in children. J Pak Med Assoc 55:502–507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vinchon M, Fichten A, Delestret I, Dhellemmes P (2003) Shunt revision for asymptomatic failure: Surgical and clinical results. Neurosurgery 52:347–353 discussion 353–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C, La Marca F (1996) Shunt complications in the first postoperative year in children with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst 12:748–754

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blount JP, Campbell JA, Haines SJ (1993) Complications in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid shunting. Neurosurg Clin North Am 4:633–656

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cochrane DD, Kestle JR (2003) The influence of surgical operative experience on the duration of first ventriculoperitoneal shunt function and infection. Pediatr Neurosurg 38:295–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kestle J, Drake J, Milner R, Sainle-Rose, Cinalli G, Boop F, Piatt J, Haines S, Schiff S, Cochrane D, Steinbok P, MacNeil N (2000) Long-term follow-up data from the Shunt Design Trial. Pediatr Neurosurg 33:230–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Esposito C, Porreca A, Gangemi M, et al. (1998) The use of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal complications of ventriculoperitoneal shunts in children. Pediatr Surg Int 13:352–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lortat-Jacob S, Pierre-Kahn A, Renier D, et al. (1984) Abdominal complications of ventriculoperitoneal shunts in children: 65 cases. Chir Pediatr 25:17–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Acharya R, Ramachandran CS, Singh S (2001) Laparoscopic management of abdominal complications in ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 11:167–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pernas JC, Catala J (2004) Case 72: Pseudocyst around ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Radiology 232:239–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deinsberger W, Langhans M, Winking M, Boker DK (1995) Retrieval of a disconnected ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter by laparoscopy in a newborn child: Case report. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 38:123–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Samdani AF, Storm PB, Kuchner EB, et al. (2005) Ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunction presenting with pleuritic chest pain. Pediatr Emerg Care 21:261–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Naradzay JF, Browne BJ, Rolnick MA, Doherty RJ (1999) Cerebral ventricular shunts. J Emerg Med 17:311–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paddon AJ, Horton D (2000) Knotting of distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt tubing. Clin Radiol 55:1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kusano T, Miyazato H, Shimoji H, et al. (1998) Revision of ventriculoperitoneal shunt under laparoscopic guidance in patients with hydrocephalus. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8:474–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Turner R, Chahlavi A, Rasmussen P, Brody F (2004) Laparoscopic revision of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14:310–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oh A, Wildbrett P, Golub R, et al. (2001) Laparoscopic repositioning of a ventriculoperitoneal catheter tip for a sterile abdominal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pseudocyst. Surg Endosc 15:518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goeser CD, McLeary MS, Young LW (1998) Diagnostic imaging of ventriculoperitoneal shunt malfunctions and complications. Radiographics 18:635–651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartynski WS, Valliappan S, Uselman JH, Spearman MP (2000) The adult radiographic shuntogram. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:721–726

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Drake JM, Martin AJ, Henkleman RM (1991) Determination of cerebrospinal fluid shunt obstruction with magnetic resonance phase imaging. J Neurosurg 75:535–540

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Seppanen U, Serlo W, Saukkonen AL (1987) Valvography in the assessment of hydrocephalus shunt function in children. Neuroradiology 29:53–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Salomao JF, Leibinger RD (1999) Abdominal pseudocysts complicating CSF shunting in infants and children: Report of 18 cases. Pediatr Neurosurg 31:274–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Khaitan L, Brennan EJ Jr (1999) A laparoscopic approach to ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in adults. Surg Endosc 13:1007–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Khosrovi H, Kaufman HH, Hrabovsky E, et al. (1998) Laparoscopic-assisted distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Surg Neurol 49:127–34 discussion 134–135

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chopra I, Gnanalingham K, Pal D, Peterson D (2004) A knot in the catheter: An unusual cause of ventriculoperitoneal shunt blockage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146:1055–1056 discussion 1056–1057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Naim Ur R, Jamjoom A, Jamjoom ZA (1996) Intestinal obstruction caused by extraperitoneal cerebrospinal fluid collection. Pediatr Neurosurg 25:160–162 discussion 163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fewel ME, Garton HJ (2004) Migration of distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter into the heart: Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):206–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hirano Y, Sasajima H, Mineura K, et al. (1997) Laparoscopic retrieval of a dislocated ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter: Report of three cases and a review of the literature. No Shinkei Geka 25:629–633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    V. Nfonsam, B. Chand & S. Rosenblatt

  2. Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    R. Turner & M. Luciano

Authors
  1. V. Nfonsam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Chand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Rosenblatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Luciano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Nfonsam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nfonsam, V., Chand, B., Rosenblatt, S. et al. Laparoscopic management of distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications. Surg Endosc 22, 1866–1870 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9728-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9728-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation