Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: When tissue is the issue

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS FNA) has a high accuracy in the evaluation of mediastinal lesions. The use of a core biopsy needle for EUS guided biopsy (EUS TCB) may further improve the yield of EUS. The aims of this study are to evaluate the safety of EUS TCB in thoracic lesions and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of TCB with FNA and FNA + TCB.

Methods

A single-center retrospective study. All patients underwent EUS-FNA and TCB. A cytopathologist was not present during the procedure. EUS FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB diagnostic accuracy were compared.

Results

A total of 48 patients were included. The lesions sampled included 41 lymph nodes (six aorto-pulmonary window, 32 subcarinal, two right paratracheal, one paraesophageal ATS station 8), five lung masses, and two esophageal masses. Twenty-nine patients had malignant disease and 19 had benign disorders. The overall diagnostic accuracy of FNA, TCB and FNA + TCB was 79%, 79% and 98% respectively (p = 0.007). TCB changed the diagnosis in nine cases missed by FNA. EUS TCB was better than FNA for benign diseases (89% vs. 63%, p = 0.04). All eight patients with a prior failed biopsy had a correct diagnosis established by EUS. No patient required mediastinoscopy or thoracoscopy after EUS.

Conclusion

The combination of TCB and FNA is superior to FNA alone. EUS-guided TCB should be considered in patients with benign disorders of the mediastinum when other modalities fail to yield a diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Raj M, Chen RY. (2006) Interventional applications of endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21(2):348–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram PV, Bobrowski C, et al. (2000) Mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with or without previous malignancy: EUS-FNA-based differential cytodiagnosis in 153 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 95(9):2278–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Annema JT, Veselic M, Rabe KF. (2005) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Eur Respir J 25(3):405–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA, Eltoum IA. (2003) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist’s perspective. Am J Clin Pathol 120(3):351–67

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wiersema MJ, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wiersema LM. (2001) Evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy with endoscopic US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 219:252–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Larsen SS, Krasnik M, Vilmann P, Pedersen JH, Faurschou P, Folke K. (2002) Endoscopic ultrasound guided biopsy of mediastinal lesions has a major impact on patient management. Thorax 57:98–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fickling W, Wallace MB. (2002) EUS in lung cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 56(4 suppl):S18–S21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wildi SM, Judson MA, Fraig M, et al. (2000) Is endosonography guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for sarcoidosis as good as we think? Thorax 59(9):794–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Storch I, Jorda M, Thurer R, et al. (2006) Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination. Gastrointest Endosc 64(4):505–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Storch I, Jorda M, Ribeiro A. (2005) EUS-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of pulmonary lymphoma in a patient with an esophagopulmonary fistula. Gastrointest Endosc 61(7):904–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Larghi A, Rodriguez-Wulff E, Noffsinger A. (2006) Dye CERecurrent malignant thymoma diagnosed by EUS-guided Trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 63(6):859–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wittmann J, Kocjan G, Sgouros SN, Deheragoda M, Pereira SP. (2006) Endoscopic ultrasound- guided tissue sampling by combined fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy: a prospective study. Cytopathology 17(1):27–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz N, et al. (2006) Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 36(5):397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain J, Wiersema MJ. (2003) Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc 57:101–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AJCC cancer staging manual (1997) American Joint Committee on Cancer. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA:Lippincott-Raven, 720–726

    Google Scholar 

  16. Emery SC, Savides TJ, Behling CA. (2004) Utility of immediate evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transesophageal fine needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes. Acta Cytol 48(5):630–4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tournoy KG, Praet MM, Van Maele G, Van Meerbeeck JP. (2005) Esophageal Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration with an on-site cytopathologist: high accuracy for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Chest 128:3004–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gines A, Wiersema MJ, Clain JE, Pochron NL, Rajan E, Levy MJ. (2006) Prospective study of a trucut needle performing EUS-guided biopsy with EUS-guided FNA rescue. Gastrointes Endosc 62:602–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA

    Ian Storch, Mubashir Shah & A. Ribeiro

  2. Division of Pulmonary, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA

    Elio Donna

  3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA

    R. Thurer

Authors
  1. Ian Storch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mubashir Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Thurer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elio Donna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Ribeiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Storch, I., Shah, M., Thurer, R. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and Trucut biopsy in thoracic lesions: When tissue is the issue. Surg Endosc 22, 86–90 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9374-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9374-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation