Abstract
Background
Intraoperative ultrasonography (US) is used in many centers before oncologic liver resections to detect additional tumors and to evaluate the relationship of tumors to major vascular structures. As preoperative imaging improves, it is expected that the diagnostic yield from intraoperative US will diminish. In this study we attempt to determine if fewer unrecognized tumors were being detected and whether intraoperative US is having less impact on surgical decision making.
Methods
We compared 50 consecutive cases (mean age = 57.2 ± 10 years; 27 men) who underwent laparotomy for a planned resection of primary liver malignancies or metastases between September 2003 and July 2005 with 50 consecutive cases (mean age = 56.9 ± 14 years; 25 men) between January 1999 and September 2003. Dedicated intraoperative liver US was performed or supervised by a gastrointestinal radiologist using a 5.0-MHz linear- or curvilinear-array transducer during each procedure.
Results
The rate of detecting unrecognized tumors has not changed significantly (14% vs. 20%, p = 0.70). The use of US to establish the relationship between tumor and the vasculature has not changed (48% vs. 60%, p = 0.23). The percentage of cases where the US findings were responsible for altering surgical management was 20% for both groups. The resection rate was 72% for both groups. The negative resection margin rate has also not changed significantly (86% vs. 69%, p = 0.09).
Conclusions
Despite the advances in cross-sectional imaging, the frequency of unrecognized tumors found during intraoperative liver US and its use for surgical guidance has not changed significantly. Currently routine intraoperative US alters the management of approximately one fifth of our patients undergoing attempted liver resection for primary malignancies or metastases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bloed W, van Leeuwen MS, Borel Rinkes IH (2000) Role of intraoperative ultrasound of the liver with improved preoperative hepatic imaging. Eur J Surg 166: 691–695
Cervone A, Sardi A, Conaway GL (2000) Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is essential in the management of metastatic colorectal liver lesions. Am Surg 66: 611–615
Cerwenka H, Raith J, Bacher H, Werkgartner G, el-Shabrawi A, Kornprat P, Mischinger HJ (2003) Is intraoperative ultrasonography during partial hepatectomy still necessary in the age of magnetic resonance imaging? Hepatogastroenterology 50: 1539–1541
Guimaraes CM, Correia MM, Baldisserotto M, de Queiroz Aires EP, Coelho JF (2004) Intraoperative ultrasonography of the liver in patients with abdominal tumors: a new approach. J Ultrasound Med 23: 1549–1555
Iglehart JK (2006) The new era of medical imaging—progress and pitfalls. N Engl J Med 354: 2822–2828
Kamel IR, Choti MA, Horton KM, Braga HJ, Birnbaum BA, Fishman EK, Thompson RE, Bluemke DA (2003) Surgically staged focal liver lesions: accuracy and reproducibility of dual-phase helical CT for detection and characterization. Radiology 227: 752–757
Kane RA, Hughes LA, Cua EJ, Steele GD, Jenkins RL, Cady B (1994) The impact of intraoperative ultrasonography on surgery for liver neoplasms. J Ultrasound Med 13: 1–6
Kruskal J, Kane R (1999) Intraoperative ultrasound of the liver. In: Kane R (ed) Intraoperative, Laparoscopic and Endoluminal Ultrasound. Churchill Livinstone, Philadelphia, pp 40–67
Ozsunar Y, Skjoldbye B, Court-Payen M, Karstrup S, Burcharth F (2000) Impact of intraoperative ultrasonography on surgical treatment of liver tumours. Acta Radiol 41: 97–101
Sahani D, Saini S, Pena C, Nichols S, Prasad SR, Hahn PF, Halpern EF, Tanabe KK, Mueller PR (2002) Using multidetector CT for preoperative vascular evaluation of liver neoplasms: technique and results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179: 53–59
Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Tanabe KK, Hayat SM, O’Neill MJ, Halpern EF, Saini S, Mueller PR (2004) Intraoperative US in patients undergoing surgery for liver neoplasms: comparison with MR imaging. Radiology 232: 810-814
Schmidt J, Strotzer M, Fraunhofer S, Boedeker H, Zirngibl H (2000) Intraoperative ultrasonography versus helical computed tomography and computed tomography with arterioportography in diagnosing colorectal liver metastases: lesion-by-lesion analysis. World J Surg 24: 43–47; discussion 48
Vogl TJ, Schwarz W, Blume S, Pietsch M, Shamsi K, Franz M, Lobeck H, Balzer T, del Tredici K, Neuhaus P, Felix R, Hammerstingl RM (2003) Preoperative evaluation of malignant liver tumors: comparison of unenhanced and SPIO (Resovist)-enhanced MR imaging with biphasic CTAP and intraoperative US. Eur Radiol 13: 262–272
Zacherl J, Pokieser P, Wrba F, Scheuba C, Prokesch R, Zacherl M, Langle F, Berlakovich GA, Muhlbacher F, Steininger R (2002) Accuracy of multiphasic helical computed tomography and intraoperative sonography in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation for hepatoma: what is the truth? Ann Surg 235: 528–532
Zacherl J, Scheuba C, Imhof M, Zacherl M, Langle F, Pokieser P, Wrba F, Wenzl E, Muhlbacher F, Jakesz R, Steininger R (2002) Current value of intraoperative sonography during surgery for hepatic neoplasms. World J Surg 26: 550–554
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presented at the Meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Dallas, TX, 26–29 April 2006
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellsmere, J., Kane, R., Grinbaum, R. et al. Intraoperative ultrasonography during planned liver resections: why are we still performing it?. Surg Endosc 21, 1280–1283 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9192-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-9192-6