Skip to main content
Log in

Laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis

To preserve the upper or the lower pole of the spleen?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Clinical manifestations of hereditary spherocytosis can be controlled by splenectomy. The use of this procedure has been restricted due to concerns regarding exposure of patients to a lifelong risk of overwhelming infections. Subtotal splenectomy, which removes 85–90% of the enlarged spleen, is a logical alternative. In the first cases performed by laparoscopy we have chosen to preserve the upper pole. However, this technique showed some disadvantages, especially concerning the correct intraoperative evaluation of the splenic remnant volume. Therefore, we developed a new variant of the procedure by preserving the lower pole of the spleen.

Methods

Based on the authors’ experience in laparoscopy (176 laparoscopic splenectomies), 10 laparoscopic subtotal splenectomies were performed in patients with hereditary microspherocytosis, preserving either the upper or the lower splenic pole.

Results

Patient age ranged between 5 and 35 years. The mean volume of the remnant spleen was 41.4 cm3. There were no complications, and no transfusions were needed. Follow-up for 1–30 months was available.

Conclusions

Subtotal splenectomy appears to control hemolysis while maintaining splenic function. The laparoscopic approach is safe and effective and should be considered the procedure of choice in hereditary microspherocytosis. Laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy presents an advantage over open subtotal splenectomy, resulting in decreased blood loss, shorter hospital stay, no conversions, fewer operative and postoperative complications, and excellent remission rates. On the basis of our experience, the preservation of the lower pole of the spleen seems to be a first-line option for the optimal evaluation of the residual splenic mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvarez FE, Greco RS (1980) Regeneration of the spleen after ectopic implantation and partial splenectomy. Arch Surg 115: 772–775

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bader-Meunier B, Gauthier F, Archambaud F, Cynober T, Mielot F, Dommergues JP, Warszawski J, Mohandas N, Tchernia G (2001) Long-term evaluation of the beneficial effect of subtotal splenectomy for management of hereditary spherocytosis. Blood 97: 399–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergman RA, Afifi AK, Miyauchi R (2003) Splenic artery branches: posterior gastric, superior polar of spleen and gastrosplenic artery. In Illustrated encyclopedia of human anatomic variation. II: cardiovascular system. http://www.anatomyatlases.org

  4. Bolton-Maggs PH, Stevens RF, Dodd NJ, Lamont G, Tittensor P, King MJ (2004) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of hereditary spherocytosis. Br J Haematol 126: 455–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brigden ML, Pattullo AL (1999) Prevention and management of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection—an update. Crit Care Med 27: 836–842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Drew PA, Clayer MT, Jamieson GG (1990) The value of splenic autotransplantation. Arch Surg 125: 1224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holibkova A, Machalek L, Houserkova D, Ruzicka V (1998) A contribution to the types of branching and anastomoses of the splenic artery in human spleen. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med 141: 49–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Machalek L, Holibkova A, Tuma J, Houserkova D (1998) The size of the splenic hilus, diameter of the splenic artery and its branches in the human spleen. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc Fac Med 141: 45–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Petroianu A (1988) Treatment of portal hypertension by subtotal splenectomy and central splenorenal shunt. Postgrad Med J 64: 38–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Petroianu A (1992) Splenic viability after segmental devascularization. Rev Paul Med 110: 39–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Petroianu A (1996) Subtotal splenectomy for treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and myeloid metaplasia. Int Surg 81: 177–179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Petroianu A, da Silva RG, Simal CJ, de Carvalho DG, da Silva RA (1997) Late postoperative follow-up of patients submitted to subtotal splenectomy. Am Surg 63: 735–740

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petroianu A, Ferreira VL, Barbosa AJ (1989) Morphology and viability of the spleen after subtotal splenectomy. Braz J Med Biol Res 22: 491–495

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petroianu A, Simal CJ (1993) Shifts in the reticuloendothelial system uptake pattern induced by carbon colloid in the rat. Med Sci Res 21: 311–312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Resende V, Petroianu A (2003) Functions of the splenic remnant after subtotal splenectomy for treatment of severe splenic injuries. Am J Surg 185: 311–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rice HE, Oldham KT, Hillery CA, Skinner MA, O’Hara SM, Ware RE (2003) Clinical and hematologic benefits of partial splenectomy for congenital hemolytic anemias in children. Ann Surg 237: 281–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seshadri PA, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM (2000) Technique for laparoscopic partial splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10: 106–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stoehr GA, Stauffer UG, Eber SW (2005) Near-total splenectomy: a new technique for the management of hereditary spherocytosis. Ann Surg 241: 40–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tchernia G, Bader-Meunier B, Berterottiere P, Eber S, Dommergues JP, Gauthier F (1997) Effectiveness of partial splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Curr Opin Hematol 4: 136–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tchernia G, Gauthier F, Mielot F, Dommergues JP, Yvart J, Chasis JA, Mohandas N (1993) Initial assessment of the beneficial effect of partial splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Blood 81: 2014–2020

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Treutner K, Klosterhalfen B, Winkeltau G, Moench S, Schumpelick V (1993) Vascular anatomy of the spleen: the basis for organ-preserving surgery. Clin Anat 6: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vasilescu C, Stanciulea O, Colita A, Stoia R, Moicean A, Arion C (2003) Laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy in the treatment of hereditary spherocytosis. Chirurgia (Bucur) 98: 571–576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Walsh RM, Chand B, Brodsky J, Heniford BT (2003) Determination of intact splenic weight based on morcellated weight. Surg Endosc 17: 1266–1268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Leslie Cizmas, Ph.D., Texas A&M University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Vasilescu.

Additional information

The paper is based on material presented at the 13th International Congress of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), Venice, 2005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vasilescu, C., Stanciulea, O., Tudor, S. et al. Laparoscopic subtotal splenectomy in hereditary spherocytosis. Surg Endosc 20, 748–752 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0429-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0429-6

Keywords

Navigation