Abstract
Background
This study compared porcine and human thoracic spine anatomies for a better understanding of how structures encountered during thoracoscopy differ between training with a porcine model and actual surgery in humans.
Methods
Parameters were measured including vertebral body height, width, and depth; disc height; rib spacing; spinal canal depth and width; and pedicle height and width.
Results
Although most porcine vertebral structures were smaller, porcine pedicle height was significantly greater than that of humans because the porcine pedicle houses a unique transverse foramen. The longus colli and psoas attach, respectively, to T5 and T13 in swine and to T3 and T12 in humans. In swine, the azygos vein generally was absent. The intercostal veins drained into the hemiazygos vein.
Conclusions
Several thoracoscopically relevant anatomic differences between human and porcine spinal anatomies were identified. A thoracoscopic approach in a porcine model probably is best performed from the right side. The best general working area is between T6 and T10.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arlet V (2000) Anterior thoracoscopic spine release in deformity surgery: a meta-analysis and review. Eur Spine J 9(Suppl 1): S17–S23
Burgos J, Rapariz JM, Gonzalez-Herranz P (1998) Anterior endoscopic approach to the thoracolumbar spine. Spine 23: 2427–2431
Caputy A, Starr J, Riedel C (1995) Video-assisted endoscopic spinal surgery: thoracoscopic discectomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 134: 196–199
Chanchairujira K, Chung CB, Kim JY, Papakonstantinou O, Lee MH, Clopton P, Resnick D (2004) Intervertebral disk calcification of the spine in an elderly population: radiographic prevalence, location, and distribution and correlation with spinal degeneration. Radiology 230: 499–503
Connolly PJ, Ordway NR, Sacks T, Kolata R, Yuan HA (1999) Video-assisted thoracic diskectomy and anterior release: a biomechanical analysis of an endoscopic technique. Orthopedics 22: 923–926
Dickman CA, Detwiler PW, Porter RW (2000) Endoscopic spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 46: 526–553
Dickman CA, Fessler RG (1999) Education and credentialing for thoracoscopic spine surgery. In: Dickman CA, Rosenthal DJ, Perin NI (eds) Thoracoscopic spine surgery. Thieme, New York pp 19–26
Ebara S, Kamimura M, Itoh H, Kinoshita T, Takahashi J, Takaoka K, Ohtsuka K (2000) A new system for the anterior restoration and fixation of thoracic spinal deformities using an endoscopic approach. Spine 25: 876–883
Han PP, Dickman CA (2002) Thoracoscopic resection of thoracic neurogenic tumors. J Neurosurg Spine 96: 304–308
Han PP, Gottfried ON, Kenny KJ, Dickman CA (2002) Biportal thoracoscopic sympathectomy: surgical techniques and clinical results for the treatment of hyperhidrosis. Neurosurgery 50: 306–311
Han PP, Kenny K, Dickman CA (2002) Thoracoscopic approaches to the thoracic spine: experience with 241 surgical procedures. Neurosurgery 51: S88–S95
Horn EM, Henn JS, Lemole GM, Jr, Hott JS, Dickman CA (2004) Thoracoscopic placement of dual-rod instrumentation in thoracic spinal trauma. Neurosurgery 54: 1150–1153
Horowitz MB, Moossy JJ, Julian T, Ferson PF, Huneke K (1994) Thoracic discectomy using video-assisted thoracoscopy. Spine 19: 1082–1086
Karahalios DG, Apostolides PJ, Vishteh AG, Dickman CA (1997) Thoracoscopic spinal surgery: treatment of thoracic instability. Neurosurg Clin North Am 8: 555–573
Muhlbauer M, Ferguson J, Losert U, Koos WT (1998) Experimental laparoscopic and thoracoscopic discectomy and instrumented spinal fusion: a feasibility study using a porcine model. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 41: 1–4
Olinger A, Pistorius G, Lindemann W, Vollmar B, Hildebrandt U, Menger MD (1999) Effectiveness of a hands-on training course for laparoscopic spine surgery in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 13: 118–122
Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V, Federico D, Oxland T, Duranceau J, Krag M (1991) Thoracic human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 16: 888–901
Rosenthal D, Dickman CA (1998) Thoracoscopic microsurgical excision of herniated thoracic discs. J Neurosurg 89: 224–235
Rubino F, Deutsch H, Pamoukian V, Zhu JF, King WA, Gagner M (2000) Minimally invasive spine surgery: an animal model for endoscopic approach to the anterior cervical and upper thoracic spine. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10: 309–313
Smit TH (2002) The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine: biomechanical considerations. Eur Spine J 11: 137–144
Visocchi M, Masferrer R, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA (1998) Thoracoscopic approaches to the thoracic spine. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140: 737–743
Wall EJ, Bylski-Austrow DI, Shelton FS, Crawford AH, Kolata RJ, Baum DS (1998) Endoscopic discectomy increases thoracic spine flexibility as effectively as open discectomy: a mechanical study in a porcine model. Spine 23: 9–15
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Luis Perez, MD, Geun Sung Song, MD, and Mary Fifield, BSE for their assistance with this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bozkus, H., Crawford, N.R., Chamberlain, R.H. et al. Comparative anatomy of the porcine and human thoracic spines with reference to thoracoscopic surgical techniques. Surg Endosc 19, 1652–1665 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0159-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0159-9