Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term results after laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy (TC) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

Ductal stones were present in 344 of 3,212 patients (10.7%) who underwent LC. The procedure was completed laparoscopically in 329 cases (95.6%), with a TC in 138 cases (41.9%) (the subjects of this study), and with a transcystic duct approach in 191 cases (58.1%).

Results

Biliary drainage was used in 131 of 138 cases (94.9%). There were major complications in eight patients (5.7%), and one patient died (0.7%). Retained stones were seen in 11 cases (8%). None of the patients was lost to follow-up (mean, 72.3 months; range, 11–145). Ductal stones recurred in five patients (3.6%). No signs of bile stasis and no biliary strictures were observed. In all, 121 patients are alive with no biliary symptoms; 16 have died from unrelated causes.

Conclusion

Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic TC during LC proved its safety and efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A Cuschieri E Lezoche M Morino E Croce A Lacy J Toouli A Faggioni et al. (1999) ArticleTitleE.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage managements of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi Surg Endosc 13 952–957 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901145 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvlslGisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10526025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. G Decker F Borie B Millat JC Berthou A Deleuze F Drouard F Guillon et al. (2003) ArticleTitleOne hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile duct Surg Endosc 17 12–18 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FmtFKisQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12364990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MM Dias CJ Martin MR Cox (2002) ArticleTitlePattern of management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era: a NSW survey Aust N Z J Surg 72 181–185

    Google Scholar 

  4. JP Dorman ME Franklin SuffixJr JL Glass (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy: an effective and efficient method of treatment of choledocholithiasis Surg Endosc 12 926–928 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3pvVeisw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9632862

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DI Giurgiu DR Margulies BJ Carroll J Gabbay A Iida S Takagi MJ Fallas et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic common bile duct exploration: long-term outcome Arch Surg 134 839–843 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzntFCjtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10443806

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. E Lezoche AM Paganini (1995) ArticleTitleSingle-stage laparoscopic treatment of gallstones and common bile duct stones in 120 unselected, consecutive patients Surg Endosc 9 1070–1075 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC3MfgvFE%3D Occurrence Handle8553205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. E Lezoche AM Paganini M Guerrieri (1996) ArticleTitleA new T-tube applier in laparoscopic surgery Surg Endosc 10 445–448 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB28rpsVI%3D Occurrence Handle8661801

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. TH Liu ET Consorti A Kawashima RD Ernst CT Black PH Greger SuffixJr RP Fischer et al. (1999) ArticleTitleThe efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for the evaluation of patients with suspected choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 178 480–484 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00224-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jsVeitQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10670857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. B Millat J Atger A Deleuze H Briandet A Fingerhut F Guillon E Marrel et al. (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis: a prospective evaluation in 247 consecutive unselected cases Hepatogastroenterology 44 28–34 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB3M7htFI%3D Occurrence Handle9058114

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. AM Paganini E Lezoche (1998) ArticleTitleFollow-up of 161 unselected consecutive patients treated laparoscopically for common bile duct stones Surg Endosc 12 23–29 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900586 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2Fos1yhsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9419298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. R Riciardi S Islam JJ Canete PL Arcand ME Stoker (2003) ArticleTitleEffectiveness and long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration Surg Endosc 17 19–22 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s%2FmtFKhtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12399840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. WH Schreurs JR Juttmann WN Stuifbergen HJ Oostvogel TJ Vroonhoven Particlevan (2002) ArticleTitleManagement of common bile duct stones: selective retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy: short- and long-term results Surg Endosc 16 1068–1072 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vhtFCqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11984690

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. SE Tranter MH Thompson (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct Br J Surg 89 1495–1504

    Google Scholar 

  14. R Trap S Adamsen O Hart-Hansen M Henriksen (1999) ArticleTitleSevere and fatal complications after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective series of claims to insurance covering public hospitals Endoscopy 31 125–130 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3jslyksw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10223360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. K Uchiyama H Onishi M Tani H Kinoshita M Kawai M Ueno H Yamaue (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis Ann Surg 238 97–102 Occurrence Handle12832971

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DR Urbach YS Khajanchee BA Jobe BA Standage PD Hansen LL Swanstrom (2001) ArticleTitleCost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration Surg Endosc 15 4–13 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ptlSqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11178753

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. A Waage C Stromberg CE Leijonmarck D Arvidsson (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term results from laparoscopic common bile duct exploration Surg Endosc 17 1811–1185

    Google Scholar 

  18. VL Wills K Gibson C Karihaloot JO Jorgensen (2002) ArticleTitleComplications of biliary T-tubes after choledochotomy Aust N Z J Surg 72 177–180

    Google Scholar 

  19. JS Wu NJ Soper (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of laparoscopic choledeochotomy closure techniques Surg Endosc 16 1309–1313 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vntlGqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12235508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Paganini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paganini, A.M., Guerrieri, M., Sarnari, J. et al. Long-term results after laparoscopic transverse choledochotomy for common bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 19, 705–709 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8944-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8944-4

Keywords

Navigation