Skip to main content
Log in

Miniature robots can assist in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopy reduces patient trauma but eliminates the surgeon’s ability to directly view and touch the surgical environment. Although current robot-assisted laparoscopy improves the surgeon’s ability to manipulate and visualize the target organs, the instruments and cameras remain constrained by the entry incision. This limits tool tip orientation and optimal camera placement. This article focuses on developing miniature in vivo robots to assist surgeons during laparoscopic surgery by providing an enhanced field of view from multiple angles and dexterous manipulators not constrained by the abdominal wall fulcrum effect. Miniature camera robots were inserted through a small incision into the insufflated abdominal cavity of an anesthetized pig. Trocar insertion and other laparoscopic tool placements were then viewed with these robotic cameras. The miniature robots provided additional camera angles that improved surgical visualization during a cholecystectomy. These successful prototype trials have demonstrated that miniature in vivo robots can provide surgeons with additional visual information that can increase procedural safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MC Cavusoglu W Williams F Tendick SS Sastry (2003) ArticleTitleRobotics for telesurgery: second generation Berkeley/UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applications Ind. Robot Int J 30 22–29 Occurrence Handle10.1108/01439910310457670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T Falcone JM Goldberg (2003) ArticleTitleRobotic surgery Clin Obstet Gynecol 46 37–43 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00003081-200303000-00007 Occurrence Handle12686893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. G Kazemier EJ Hazebroeck JF Lange HJ Bonjer (1998) ArticleTitleVascular injuries during laparoscopy J Am Coll Surg 186 604–605 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ktlSlsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9583705

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. PL Leggett CD Bissell R Churchman-Winn (2002) ArticleTitleAortic injury during laparoscopic fundoplication: an underreported complication Surg Endosc 16 362 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-4109-x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jtVahsA%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. RA Li J Jensen JC Bowersox (2000) ArticleTitleMicrovascular anastomoses performed in rats using microsurgical telemanipulator Comput Aided Surg 5 326–332 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0150(2000)5:5<326::AID-IGS2>3.0.CO;2-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3itlKmtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11169878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. MG Munro (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14 365–374 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00001703-200208000-00002 Occurrence Handle12151825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. R Orlando P Palatini F Lirussi (2003) ArticleTitleNeedle and trocar injuries in diagnostic laparoscopy under local anesthesia: what is the true incidence of these complications J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Techniques 13 181–184 Occurrence Handle10.1089/109264203766207708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M Rentschler A Hadzializ J Dumpert S Platt S Farritor D Oleynikov (2004) ArticleTitleIn vivo robots for laparoscopic surgery Med Meets Virtual Reality 12 316–322

    Google Scholar 

  9. E Schippers V Schumpelick (1996) ArticleTitleRequirements and possibilities of computer-assisted Endoscope surgery Comput Integrated Surg Technol Clin Appl 43 561–565

    Google Scholar 

  10. InstitutionalAuthorNameSouthern Surgeons Club (1991) ArticleTitleA prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies N Engl J Med 324 1073–1078

    Google Scholar 

  11. F Tendick RW Jennings G Thrap L Stark (1993) ArticleTitleSensing and manipulation problems in endoscopic surgery: experiment,analysis, and observation Presence 2 66–81

    Google Scholar 

  12. F Tendick R Jennings G Thrap L Stark (1996) ArticleTitlePerception and manipulation problems in endoscope surgery Comput Integrated Surg Technol Clin Appl 39 520–526

    Google Scholar 

  13. F Tendick SS Sastry RS Fearing M Cohn (1998) ArticleTitleApplications of micromechatronics in minimally invasive surgery IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics 3 34–42 Occurrence Handle10.1109/3516.662866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M Treat (1996) ArticleTitleA surgeon’s perspective on the difficulties of laparoscopic surgery Comput Integrated Surg Technol Clin Appl 41 549–556

    Google Scholar 

  15. B Wolfe B Gardinef B Leary et al. (1991) ArticleTitleEndoscopic cholecystectomy: an analysis of complications Arch Surg 126 1192–1998 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2D38fjsVU%3D Occurrence Handle1834039

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Oleynikov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oleynikov, D., Rentschler, M., Hadzialic, A. et al. Miniature robots can assist in Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19, 473–476 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8918-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8918-6

Keywords

Navigation