Abstract
Background
Acute abdominal pain is a common cause for presentation to the emergency room and hospital admission. Many of these patients will undergo exploration for suspected appendicitis, but in 20–35% of cases a normal appendix is found. Because of the limited access provided by the gridiron incision, a definitive diagnosis may not be found. Other patients may be treated conservatively and discharged, only to return with recurrent pain or more definitive symptoms of pathology. In patients with acute abdominal pain, early laparoscopy is an accurate means of both making a definitive diagnosis and avoiding a delay in the diagnosis.
Methods
We performed a retrospective analysis of 1,320 consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain over a 62-month period. All patients underwent diagnostic laparoscopy within 48 h of admission. We evaluated the initial clinical diagnosis, the laparoscopic diagnosis, and the subsequent outcome in this group of patients. Individuals with abdominal trauma were excluded from the study, and all patients were >12 years of age.
Results
A definitive diagnosis was made in 90% of patients after diagnostic laparoscopy. Laparoscopy changed the clinical diagnosis in 30% of cases. (83%) of patients underwent a laparoscopic operation for management of their condition at the time of diagnosis. In 92 patients (7%), conversion to laparotomy was required to manage their condition. Peritonitis was present in 180 patients; of 110 of them had appendicitis. Twelve patients developed complications related to the diagnostic laparoscopy or the laparoscopic operation, and there was one postoperative death due to a perforated gastric malignancy. Mean operating time was 30 min (range, 17–90)
Conclusion
Early diagnostic laparoscopy and treatment results in the accurate, prompt, and efficient management of acute abdominal pain. This technique reduces the rate of unnecessary laparotomy and right iliac fossa gridiron incisions and increases the diagnostic accuracy in these patients. This treatment method is feasible where facilities are available to accommodate the workload and there are practitioners with the requisite expertise.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D Aronsky (1997) ArticleTitleAbdominal fat necrosis as a cause of acute abdominal pain: laparoscopic diagnosis and therapy Surg Endosc 11 737–740 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900439 Occurrence Handle9214322
S Attwood PF Jones (2001) ArticleTitleUltrasound in diagnosis of acute appendicitis BMJ 322 615 Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.322.7286.615
NV Doraiswamy (1997) ArticleTitleThe neutrophil count in childhood acute appendicitis Br J Surg 64 342–344
CD Douglas ME McPherson PM Davidson JS Gani (2000) ArticleTitleRandomized controlled trial of ultrasonography in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, incorporating the Alvarado score BMJ 2000 Oct 14;321(7266) 919–922
SP Guidry GV Poole (1994) ArticleTitleThe anatomy of appendicitis Am Surg 60 68–71 Occurrence Handle8273977
DM JR Hardin (1999) ArticleTitleAcute appendicitis: review and update American Family Physicians 60(7) 2027–2034
R Hart C Rajgopal A Plewes J Sweeney W Davies D Gray B Tay (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open appendicetomy: a prospective randomized trial of 81 patients Can J Surg 39 457–462 Occurrence Handle8956810
J Hoffhian OO Rasmussen (1989) ArticleTitleAids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis Br J Surg 76 774–779 Occurrence Handle2527580
JGR Howie (1966) ArticleTitleDeath from appendicitis and appendicetomy Lancet 2 1344–1347 Occurrence Handle4162800
S Laine A Rantala R Gullichsen J Ovaska (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendicetomy—is it worthwhile? A prospective, randomized study in young women Surg Endosc 2 95–97 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900305
FR Lewis JW Holcroft J Boey JE Dunphy (1975) ArticleTitleAppendicitis: a critical review of diagnosis and treatment in 1000 cases Arch Surg 110 677–684
JM McGreevy SRG Finlayson R Alvarado WS Laycock CM Birkmeyer JD Birkmeyer (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy may be lowering the threshold to operate on patients with suspected appendicitis Surg Endosc 16 1046–1049 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8332-2
A Mittlepunckt PF Nora (1966) ArticleTitleCurrent features in the treatment of acute appendicitis: an-analysis of 1000 consecutive cases Surgery 60 971 Occurrence Handle5928112
A Pomp (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy and acute appendicitis Can J Surg 42 326–327 Occurrence Handle10526511
J Roger (1986) ArticleTitleAbdominal pain: foresight American College of Emergency Physicians . IssueID3 3
BA Salky MB Edye (1998) ArticleTitleThe role of laparoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain syndromes Surg Endosc 12 911–914 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900744 Occurrence Handle9632858
JH Scott M Amin JI Harty (1983) ArticleTitleAbnormal urinanalysis in appendicitis Urology 129(5) 1015
R Shalaby A Amos A Desoky Abdel-Hady (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic appendicetomy in children: evaluation of different techniques Surg Laparosc Endosc Percut Techni 11 22–27 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-200102000-00006
S-Y Yu J-H Chiu CC Loong C-W Wu WY Lui (1997) ArticleTitleDiagnostic laparoscopy: indications and benefits Chin Med J (Taiwan) 59 158–163
EW Taylor CA Kennedy RH Dunham JH Bloch (1995) ArticleTitleDiagnostic laparoscopy in women with acute abdominal pain Surg Endosc 5 125–128
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Golash, V., Willson, P.D. Early laparoscopy as a routine procedure in the management of acute abdominal pain: a review of 1,320 patients . Surg Endosc 19, 882–885 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8866-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8866-1