Abstract
Background
We hypothesized that the high-quality images from multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) would lead to improved sensitivity and specificity for predicting resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, thus diminishing the value of staging laparoscopy.
Methods
Forty four consecutive patients underwent thin-section dual-phase MDCT to stage their tumor, followed by an attempted pancreaticoduodenectomy. Four radiologists who were blinded to the operative outcome reviewed the scans and graded the presence of distant and nodal metastases, as well as the degree of arterial and portal involvement. The radiologic criteria for resectability were no distant metastasis, a patent portal vein, and <50% arterial involvement.
Results
The overall resectability for this cohort was 52% (23/44). The 21 unresectable cases, included five liver metastases, three peritoneal metastases, and 13 locally invasive tumors. The negative margin resection rate was 34% (15/44). There were no portal vein resections. The sensitivity and specificity of MDCT for predicting resectability were 96% (22/23) and 33% (7/21), respectively. In this cohort, the positive and negative predictive values were 61% (22/36) and 87.5% (7/8), respectively. As determined by univariate logistic regression, only the degree of arterial involvement was a significant predictor of resectability (p = 0.02). As determined by multivariate logistic regression using both arterial and portal involvement, arterial involvement was predictive (p = 0.03) but portal vein involvement was not (p = 0.45).
Conclusions
Despite the improvements in image quality obtained with multidetector-row technology, CT imaging remains a relatively nonspecific test for predicting resectability in patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Minimally invasive modalities with higher specificity, particularly laparoscopy, continue to have an important role in staging pancreatic head adenocarcinoma.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S Diehl et al. (1998) ArticleTitlePancreatic cancer: value of dual-phase helical CT in assessing resectability Radiology 206 373–378 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7hvVeqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9457188
H Friess et al. (1998) ArticleTitleThe role of diagnostic laparoscopy in pancreatic and periampullary malignancies J Am Coll Surg 186 675–682 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00100-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ptl2ntA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9632157
GM Fuhrman et al. (1994) ArticleTitleThin-section contrast-enhanced computed tomography accurately predicts the resectability of malignant pancreatic neoplasms Am J Surg 167 104–111 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(94)90060-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC2cvmvFY%3D Occurrence Handle7906097
DS Lu et al. (1997) ArticleTitleLocal staging of pancreatic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as revealed by pancreatic-phase, thin-section helical CT AJR 168 1439–1443 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA3M3is1c%3D Occurrence Handle9168704
PM McMahon et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePancreatic cancer: cost-effectiveness of imaging technologies for assessing resectability Radiology 221 93–106 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrit1KjsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11568326
ME O’Malley et al. (1999) ArticleTitleAdenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: determination of surgical unresectability with thin-section pancreatic-phase helical CT AJR 173 1513–1518 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FkvFCruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10584794
PW Pisters et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy in the staging of pancreatic cancer Br J Surg 88 325–373 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01695.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7mtVaqsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11260096
PW Prokesch et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLocal staging of pancreatic carcinoma with multi-detector row CT: use of curved planar reformations initial experience Radiology, 225 759–765
P Saldinger et al. (2000) ArticleTitleIs CT angiography sufficient for prediction of resectability of periampullary neoplasms? J Gastrointest Surg 4 233–237 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80071-2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czosFyjsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10769085
FR Spitz et al. (1997) ArticleTitlePreoperative and postoperative chemoradiation strategies in patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for a denocarcinoma of the pancreas J Clin Oncol 15 928–937 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB3MzosVU%3D Occurrence Handle9060530
H Taoka et al. (1999) ArticleTitleHow accurate is helical computed tomography for clinical staging of pancreatic cancer? Am J Surg 177 428–432 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00077-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3pt1SjtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10365885
CM Vollmen et al. (2002) ArticleTitleUtility of staging laparoscopy in subsets of peripancreatic and biliary malignancies Ann Surg 235 1–7 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200201000-00001 Occurrence Handle11753036
SK Warfield KH Zou WM Wells Suffix3rd (2002) Validation of image segmentation and expert quality with an expectation-maximization algorithm MICCAI Springer-Verlag Tokyo
RR White et al. (2001) ArticleTitleStaging of pancreatic cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation J Gastrointest Surg, 5 626–633
CG Willett et al. (1993) ArticleTitleResection margins in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas: implications for radiation therapy Ann Surg 217 144–148 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC2srpsVE%3D Occurrence Handle8094952
CJ Yeo et al. (1995) ArticleTitlePancreaticoauodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas: 201 patients Ann Surg 221 721–731 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA3Mvkt1Q%3D Occurrence Handle7794076
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ellsmere, J., Mortele, K., Sahani, D. et al. Does multidetector-row CT eliminate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing the resectability of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma?. Surg Endosc 19, 369–373 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8712-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8712-5