Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Efficacy and safety of reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments (DLI) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

A total of 125 consecutive patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were randomly assigned to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy with single-use DLI (group 1, n = 62) or DLI that were reused (group 2, n = 63) after high-level disinfection by alkalinized 2% glutaraldehyde. Operative and postoperative outcomes were investigated.

Results

There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in mean operating time, linear analogue pain scale score, duration and amount of analgesic administration, or hospital stay. Total incidence of complications (3.2% vs 4.8%, p = 0.50) and infection rates (1.6% vs 3.2%, p = 0.57) were also similar when group 1 was compared to group 2.

Conclusion

This study showed that reusing DLI did not change the operative and postoperative outcomes or the infection rate for laparoscopic cholecystectomy when strict rules for disinfection were followed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GAJ Ayliffe JR Babb CR Bradley (1992) ArticleTitle‘Sterilization’ of arthroscopes and laparoscopes. J Hosp Infect 22 265–269 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC28zlt1I%3D Occurrence Handle1363105

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. BA Campbell GA Wells WN Palmer DL Martin (1987) ArticleTitleReuse of disposable medical devices in Canadian hospitals. Am J Infect Control 15 196–200 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieD2cjmtVw%3D Occurrence Handle3674536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. X Chaufour AK Deva K Vickery J Zou P Kumaradeva GH White YE Cossart (1999) ArticleTitleEvaluation of disinfection and resterilization of reusable angioscopes with the duck hepatitis B model. J Vasc Surg 30 277–282 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzmslKguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10436447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. PJ Collignon E Graham DE Dreimanis (1996) ArticleTitleReuse in sterile sites of single-use medical devices: how common is this in Australia? Med J Aust 164 533–536 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB387ksVE%3D Occurrence Handle8649288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. SL Corson M Dole R Kraus L Richards B Logan (1979) ArticleTitleStudies in sterilization of the laparoscope. J Reprod Med 23 49–57 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BD38bjsl0%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. JG DeCoteaux EC Poulin M Lortie G Murray S Gingras (1995) ArticleTitleReuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments: a study of related surgical complications. Can J Surg 38 497–500 Occurrence Handle7497363

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DW Duppler (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic instrumentation, video imaging and equipment disinfection and sterilization. Surg Clin North Am 72 1021–1032 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2H3M%2FktFc%3D Occurrence Handle1388294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. M Elhakim H Amine S Kamel F Saad (2000) ArticleTitleEffects of intraperitoneal lidocaine combined with intravenous or intraperitoneal tenoxicam on pain relief and bowel recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesth Scand 44 929–933 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440806.x Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXmsleis7Y%3D Occurrence Handle10981568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. RP Gaynes DH Culver TC Horan JR Edwards C Richards JS Tolson (2001) ArticleTitleSurgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992–1998: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index. Clin Infect Dis 33 IssueIDSuppl 2 S69–S77 Occurrence Handle10.1086/321860 Occurrence Handle11486302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. H Gundogdu K Ocal M Caglikulekci N Karabiber E Bayramoglu M Karahan (1998) ArticleTitleHigh-level disinfection with 2% alkalinized glutaraldehyde solution for reuse of laparoscopic disposable plastic trocars. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 8 47–52 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7pt1Cqsg%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. CM Huezo F DeStefano GL Rubin HW Ory (1983) ArticleTitleRisk of wound and pelvic infection after laparoscopic tubal sterilization: instrument disinfection versus sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 61 598–602 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyC28fitVU%3D Occurrence Handle6220236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LI Johnson DA Schneider MD Austin (1982) ArticleTitleTwo per cent glutaraldehyde: a disinfectant in arthroscopy and arthroscopic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 64 237–239 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2C38%2FitFY%3D Occurrence Handle6799519

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. AG Linegar (2000) ArticleTitleRe-use of single-use disposable instrumentation. S Afr Med J 90 1097–1098 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7hslGmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11196024

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. FD Loffer (1980) ArticleTitleDisinfection vs. sterilization of gynaecological laparoscopy equipment: the experience of the Phoenix Surgicenter. J Reprod Med 25 263–266 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi6D1Mnks10%3D Occurrence Handle6450284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. HR Munoz ME Guerrero V Brandes LI Cortinez (2002) ArticleTitleEffect of timing of morphine administration during remifentanil-based anaesthesia on early recovery from anaesthesia and postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 88 814–818 Occurrence Handle10.1093/bja/88.6.814 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xlt1yrurw%3D Occurrence Handle12173199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. A Prasad RJ Foley (1995) ArticleTitleDay case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a safe and cost effective procedure. Eur J Surg 161 421–424 Occurrence Handle7548378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramesh H, Prakash K, Lekha V, Jacob G, Venugopal A, Venugopal B (2003) Port-site tuberculosis after laparoscopy. Surg Endosc DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9057-6, March 7, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  18. PF Rolansky ME Dawson TJ Novitsky (1991) ArticleTitlePlastics, endotoxins, and the LAL test. J Parent Sci Technol 45 83–87

    Google Scholar 

  19. K Roth P Heeg R Reichl (2002) ArticleTitleSpecific hygiene issues relating to reprocessing and reuse of single-use devices for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16 1091–1097 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9190-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vhtFGjsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12165829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. WA Rutula (1996) ArticleTitleAPIC guidelines for selection and use of disinfectants. Am J Infect Control 24 313–342 Occurrence Handle8870916

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. US Food and Drug Administration (1987) Compliance policy guide. Reuse of medical disposable devices. 7124.6. Washington (DC): FDA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Colak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colak, T., Ersoz, G., Akca, T. et al. Efficacy and safety of reuse of disposable laparoscopic instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 18, 727–731 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8112-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8112-x

Keywords

Navigation