Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combined endoscopic treatment for cholelithiasis associated with choledocholithiasis

  • Original articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The advent of endoscopic techniques changed surgery in many ways. For the management of cholelithiasis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the treatment of choice. This has created a dilemma in the management of choledocholithiasis. Today a number of option exist, including endoscopic sphinterotomy (ES) before LC in patients with suspected common bile duct (CBD) stones, laparoscopic bile duct exploration, open CBD exploration, and postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Also, the alternative technique of peroperative ES is emerging.

Methods

We report our experience of routine intraoperative cholangiography followed either by peroperative ERCP in one step or by transcystic drain and postoperative ERCP. In our technique, to facilitate Vater papilla cannulation we inserted a 450-cm transcystic guidewire that was caught by a duodenoscope. Papillotome was then inserted over the guidewire to ensure cannulation of the CBD.

Results

Twenty-eight patients were treated successfully in one step and 24 in two steps. The mean operative time was 181 ? 41 min for patients treated in one step and 131 ? 30 min for patients treated in two steps. The mean hospital stay was 4.8 ? 3.3 days for patients treated in one step and 9.6 ? 4.0 days for patients treated in two steps. Five patients (18%) with positive intraoperative cholangiography for stones for whom peroperative ERCP was not available showed a normal postoperative transcystic cholangiogram and therefore ERCP was canceled. Fourteen of 25 patients treated in one step and none of 17 treated in two steps had raised serum amylase, which resolved spontaneously with no symptoms. No patient developed postoperative pancreatitis. Three (10%) ERCP complications were observed, consisting of mild bleeding of the papilla. All cases were managed by endoscopic adrenaline injection. There was no mortality.

Conclusion

We believe peroperative ERCP with the technique described should be considered as the treatment of choice for choledocholithiasis associated with cholelithiasis. When single-stage treatment is not possible, a two-step rendezvous technique should be preferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LL Barr A Frame A Couanjon (1999) ArticleTitleProposed criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in candidates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 13 778–781 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901097 Occurrence Handle10430683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. JC Berthou F Drouard P Charbonneau K Moussaier (1998) ArticleTitleEvaluation of laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones in 220 patients Surg Endosc 12 16–22 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900585 Occurrence Handle9419297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. BJ Carroll MJ Fallas EH Phillips (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic transcystic choledochoscopy Surg 8 310–314

    Google Scholar 

  4. BJ Carroll EH Phillips L Dayakhovsky (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic choledoscopy: an effective approach to the common bile duct J Laparoendosc Surg 2 15–21 Occurrence Handle1533544

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. PI Cisek GC Greaney (1994) ArticleTitleThe role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of choledocholithiasis Am Surg 60 772–776 Occurrence Handle7524385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R Coppol ME Riccioni S Ciletti L Cosentino V Ripetti P Magistrelli A Picciocchi (2001) ArticleTitleSelective use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to facilitate laparoscopic cholecystectomy without cholangiography Surg Endosc 15 1213–1216 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080019 Occurrence Handle11727103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. E Deslandres M Gagner (1993) ArticleTitleIntraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Gastrointest Endosc 39 54–58 Occurrence Handle8454146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. NF Fiore G Ledniczky EA Wiebke TA Broaclie AL Pruitt RJ Goulet JL Grosfeld DF Canal (1997) ArticleTitleAn analysis of perioperative cholangiography in one thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies Surgery 122 817–821 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90092-1 Occurrence Handle9347861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. C Franciosi R Capriotti S Fina ParticleDe F Romano G Colombo S Uggeri P Sartori G Visintini F Uggeri (2000) ArticleTitleSequential endo-laparoscopic treatment in patients with common bile duct calculi Minerva Chir 55 665–671 Occurrence Handle11236342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. SM Graham JL Flowers TR Scott J Hunter (1993) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones. The utility of planned perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy: experience with 63 patients Ann Surg 218 61–67 Occurrence Handle8328830

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JG Hunter (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration Am J Surg 163 53–65 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(92)90252-M Occurrence Handle1531107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LU Jung SD Potter MF Joscia ES Gluck MA Antonelle RW Antonelle FM Steichen EB Sottile (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative ERCP Surg Rounds 19 406–412

    Google Scholar 

  13. AL Kent MR Cox TG Wilson RTA Padbury J Toouli (1994) ArticleTitleEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography following laparoscopic cholecystectomy Aust N Z J Surg 64 407–412 Occurrence Handle8010903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. JP Lenriot JC Le Neel JM Hay D Jaeck B Millat PL Fagniez (1993) ArticleTitleRetrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy for biliary lithiasis. Prospective evaluation in surgical circle Gastroenterol Clin Biol 17 244–250 Occurrence Handle8339882

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. MC Lilly ME Arregui (2001) ArticleTitleA balanced approach to choledocholithiasis Surg Endosc 15 467–472 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080020 Occurrence Handle11353963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. C Meyer J Vo Huu Lee S Rohr LC Thiry B Duclos JM Reimund R Baumann (1999) ArticleTitleManagement of common bile duct stones in a single operation combining laparoscopic cholecystectomy and perioperative endoscopic sphincterotomy Surg Endosc 13 874–877 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901123 Occurrence Handle10449842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. AM Paganini E Lezoche (1998) ArticleTitleFollow-up of 161 unselected consecutive patients treated laparoscopically for common bile duct stones Surg Endosc 12 23–29 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900586 Occurrence Handle9419298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. AE Park MJ Mastrangelo SuffixJr (2000) ArticleTitleEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of choledocholithiasis Surg Endosc 14 219–226 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000036 Occurrence Handle10741436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. A Paul B Millat U Holthausen S Sauerland E Neugebauer (1998) ArticleTitleDiagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Results of a consensus development conference Surg Endosc 12 856–864 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900729 Occurrence Handle9602006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. EH Philips M Liberman BJ Carroll MJ Fallas RJ Rosenthal JR Hia (1995) ArticleTitleBile duct stones in the laparoscopic era. Is preoperative sphincterotomy necessary? Arch Surg 130 880–885 Occurrence Handle7632150

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. F Prat B Meduri B Ducot R Chiche R Salimbeni-Bartolini G Pelletier (1999) ArticleTitlePrediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests. Ann Surg 229 362–368 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199903000-00009 Occurrence Handle10077048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. R Salm J Waininger U Matern EH Farthmann (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic techniques in therapy of choledocholithiasis Chirurg 65 418–423 Occurrence Handle8050294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. SC Stain H Cohen M Tsuishoysha AJ Donovan (1991) ArticleTitleCholedocholithiasis: endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration? Ann Surg 213 627–634 Occurrence Handle2039294

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. A Tricarico G Cione . Sozio et al. (2002) ArticleTitleEndolaparoscopic rendezvous treatment: a satisfying therapeutic choice for cholecystocholedocolithiasis Surg Endosc 16 711–713 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640090074 Occurrence Handle11972222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. E Trondsen B Edwin O Reitersen AE Faerden H Fagertun AR Rosseland (1998) ArticleTitlePrediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function Arch Surg 133 162–166 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.133.2.162 Occurrence Handle9484728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. J Vracko KL Wiechel (1998) ArticleTitleHow often might a trans-cystic-duct stone extraction be feasible? Surg Endosc 12 12–15 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900584 Occurrence Handle9419296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. GL Williams KD Vellacott (2002) ArticleTitleSelective operative cholangiography and perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 16 465–467 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-9051-4 Occurrence Handle11928029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. TG Wilson JC Hall JM Watts (1986) ArticleTitleIs operative cholangiography always necessary? Br J Surg 73 637–640 Occurrence Handle3742178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Saccomani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saccomani, G., Durante, V., Magnolia, M.R. et al. Combined endoscopic treatment for cholelithiasis associated with choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc 19, 910–914 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9314-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9314-3

Keywords

Navigation