Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (Endo Assist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The role of the human camera holder during laparoscopic surgery keeps valuable personnel from other duties. EndoAssist is a robotic cameraholding device controlled by the operator’s head movements. This study assesses its introduction into clinical practice.

Method

Ninety-three patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized to have either the robotic (40) or a human (46) assistant. Seven patients converted to open operation were excluded. Six surgeons were evaluated. Operating time and subjective assessments were recorded. Learning curves were constructed.

Results

The mean operating time was less using the robotic assistant (66 min) than with human assistance (74. min) (p<0.05, two-tailed t-test). The learning curves for operating time showed that within three operations surgeons were trained in using the robot. The device was safe in use.

Conclusion

The EndoAssist operating device is a significant asset in laparoscopic surgery and a suitable substitute for a human assistant. Surgeons became competent in the use of the robot within three operations. The robot offers stability and good control of the television image in laparoscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baca I, Goetzen V (1998) Robotic assistance in “solo surgery” and complex laparoscopic procedures (abstract) Surg Endosc 12: 500

    Google Scholar 

  2. Begin E, Gagner M, Hurteau R, de Santis S, Pomp A (1995) A robotic camera for laparoscopic surgery: Conception and experimental results. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5: 6–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cadeddu J, Stoianovici D, Kavoussi LR (1998) Robotic surgery in urology. Urol Clin N Am 25: 75–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Finlay PA (1996) Clinical experience with a goniometric headcontrolled laparoscope manipulator. Proceedings of the IARP Workshop on Medical Robotics, Vienna, Oct 1996

  5. Gagner M, Begin E, Hurteau R, Pomp A (1994) Robotic interactive laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 343: 596–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geis WP (1996) Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilisation in complex minimally invasive procedures. Proceedings of 4th International Symposium, Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: 4, Healthcare in the Information Age: Future Tools for Transforming Medicine. San Diego, CA

  7. Gracia C (1996) Clinical utility of a robotic assistant during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual International Conference for Minimally Invasive Therapy, Milan, Italy, September

  8. Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW (1995) Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 154: 2134–2136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kornsuthisopon S (1999) New release of the Boonpong laparoscopic camera holder. Aust N Z J Surg 69: 141–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moran ME (1993) Stationary and automated laparoscopically assisted technologies. J Laparoendosc Surg 3: 221–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Omote K, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, Arbter K, Guo-Qing W, Siewert JR (1999) Self-guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control. Am J Surg 177: 321–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR (1995) Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 181: 552–557

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sackier JM, Wang Y (1994) Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development. Surg Endosc 8: 63–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sackier JM, Wooters C, Jacobs L, Halversen A, Uecker D, Wang Y (1997) Voice activation of a surgical robotic assistant. Am J Surg 174: 406–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Uggen PE, Marvik R, Myrvold HE, Finlay PA (1996) Assessment of EndoSista, a head controlled camera manipulator. Proceedings of E. A. E. S. Trondheim, Norway, June

  16. Warden J (1996) UK waiting lists grow longer. Br Med J 316: 1627

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zweifler MJ, Leitman IM, Subramaniam VA, Turgeon R, Mitchell D (1998) Does the use of the surgical robot allow for the replacement of an assistant during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? (abstract) Surg Endosc 12: 510

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 14 June 2002

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiono, S., Gilbert, J.M., Soin, B. et al. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (Endo Assist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 16, 1267–1270 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9174-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9174-7

Key words

Navigation