Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of lavage on intraabdominal cell burden

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Abdominal lavage is a common surgical practice, but few studies have been conducted to assess its efficacy at removing cells from the abdominal cavity, particularly during laparoscopic surgery. Methods: After three 12-mm trocars were inserted into six female 30-kg pigs at the umbilicus left and right iliac fossae, the abdomen was insufflated with carbon dioxide. The pelvis of each pigs was injected with 6 million radiolabeled LIM 1215 cells. Then the abdominal cavity was irrigated with either 500 ml 0.9% saline, 500 ml 10% betadine solution, or 1 L 0.9% saline. A maximum of 5 L of solution was used for each animal. The lavage fluid was suctioned into separate containers after each aliquot, and each container was measured for radioactivity. Results: Significantly greater numbers of cells were removed by lavage by the first to third lavage cycle; however, after four lavage cycles, relatively few cells were removed by each further cycle. No difference was observed between 500-ml and 1-L aliquots. Additionally, the mechanical efficacy of 0.9% saline and 10% betadine solution appeared similar. Conclusion: These findings suggest that optimal lavage consists of four irrigation/suction cycles utilizing 500-ml aliquots.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brundell, S., Tucker, K., Chatterton, B. et al. The effect of lavage on intraabdominal cell burden. Surg Endosc 16, 1064–1067 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9111-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9111-9

Navigation