Skip to main content
Log in

Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Approximately 10% of patients with symptomatic gallstones may have associated common bile duct stones (CBDS). However, the predictive value of noninvasive tests as well as the properative diagnosis and management of CBDS have not been well defined. The aim of this study was to define an accurate and simple model for the prediction and management of CBDS.

Methods

A prospective database containing 986 cholecystectomies performed from 1994 through 1999 was evaluated. Univariate analysis using the Pearson chi-square test was performed to determine the factors significantly related to the presence of CBDS. Then logistic regression analysis was performed for multivariate analysis to discover independent predictors.

Results

Of the 986 patients in this study, 48 (5%) had CBDS. Of the 48 patients with choledocholithiasis, 22 (46%) were men and 26 (54%) were women. The mean age was 55.3 years (range, 16–87 years). As a result of multivariate analysis, abdominal ultrasonographic findings suggestive of CBDS (common bile duct diameter exceeding 8 mm or visible stones), total bilirubin, and gamma glutumyl transpeptidase levels above normal were the independent predictors of CBDS in patients age 70 or younger. On the other hand, an elevated bilirubin level was found to be the single independent factor related to CBDS in the elderly

Conclusions

For patients with gallstones, suggestive ultrasonographic findings in those younger than 71 years and elevated direct or total bilirubin level in those older than 70 years are the most valuable and practical predictors of CBDS, and thus are the proper indications for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbout PA, Malet PF, Berlin JA, Staroscik R, Cabana MD, Clarke JR, Shea JA, Schwartz JS, Williams SV (1996) Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 450–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alponat A, Kum CK, Rajnakova A, Koh BC, Goh PM (1997) Predictive factors for synchronous common bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis. Surg Endosc 11:928–932

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barkun AN, Barkun JS, Fried GM, Ghitulescu G, Steinmetz O, Pham J, Meakins JL, Goresky CA (1994) Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 220: 32–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cisek PL, Greaney GC (1994) The role of cholangiopancreatography with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of choledocholithiasis. Am Surg 60: 772–776

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, Croce E, Lacy A, Toouli J, Faggioni A, Ribeiro VM, Jakimowicz J, Visa J, Hanna GB (1999) EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13: 952–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, Fried R, Zuber M, Harder F (2000) Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg 135: 148–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1992) NIH Consensus Statement 10: 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Graham SM, Flowers JL, Scott TR, Bailey RW, Scowill VA, Zucker KA, Imbembo AL (1993) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and common bile duct stones: the utility of planned perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy: experience with 63 patients. Ann Surg 218: 61–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hauer-Jensen M, Karesen R, Nygaard K, Solheim K, Amlie E, Havig O, Viddal KO (1985) Predictive ability of choledocholithiasis indicators: a prospective evaluation. Ann Surg 202: 64–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Heili MJ, Wintz NK, Fowler DL (1999) Choledocholithiasis: endoscopic versus laparoscopic management. Am Surg 65: 135–138

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Korman J, Cosgrove J, Furman M, Nathan I, Cohen J (1996) The role of endoscopic cholangiopancreatography and cholangiography in the laparoscopic era. Ann Surg 223: 213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leitman IM, Fisher LM, McKinley MJ, Rothman R, Ward RJ, Reiner DS, Tortolani AJ (1993) The evaluation and management of known or suspected stones of the common bile duct in the era of minimal access surgery. Surg Gynecol Obstet 176: 527–533

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu C-L, Lo C-M, Fan S-T (1997) Acute biliary pancreatitis: diagnosis and management. World J Surg 21: 149–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Onken JE, Brazer SE, Eisen GM, Williams DM, Bouras ER, DeLong ER, Long TT, Pancotto FS, Rhodes DL, Cotton PB (1996) Predicting the presence of choledocholithiasis in patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol 91: 762–767

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B, Chiche R, Salimbeni-Bertolini R, Pelletier G (1999) Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests. Ann Surg 229: 362–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Roston AD, Jacobson IM (1997) Evaluation of the pattern of liver tests and yield of cholangiography in symptomatic choledocholithiasis: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 45: 394–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahai AV, Mauldin PD, Marsi V, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ (1999) Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decision analysis to assess the roles of intraoperative cholangiography, EUS, and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 49: 334–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Santucci L, Natalini G, Sarpi L, Fiorucci S, Solinas A, Morelli A (1996) Selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and preoperative bile duct stone removal in patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 91: 1326–1330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka M, Takahata S, Konomi H, Matsunaga H, Yokohata K, Takeda T, Utsunomiya N, Ikeda S (1998) Long-term consequence of endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 48: 465–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tham TCK, Lichtenstein DR, Vandervoort J, Wong RCK, Brooks D, Dam JV, Ruymann F, Farraye F, Carr-Locke DL (1998) Role of endoscopic cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 47: 50–56

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Faerden AE, Fagertun H, Rossalend AR (1998) Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function. Arch Surg 133: 162–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Online publication: 12 June 2001

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kama, N.A., Atili, M., Doganay, M. et al. Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones. Surg Endosc 15, 942–945 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-0005-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-0005-7

Key words

Navigation