Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Pyridostigmine on Esophageal and Pharyngeal Motility in Dysphagic Patients Undergoing High-Resolution Manometry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weak or absent peristalsis of the esophageal musculature is a common finding in ambulatory patients suffering from dysphagia and frequently associated with gastroesophageal reflux. There is currently no pharmacologic intervention that reliably improves esophageal contractility in patients suffering from various esophageal motility disorders. Our objective was to evaluate the acute effects of pyridostigmine on high-resolution manometry parameters in patients suffering from dysphagia with evidence of esophageal dysmotility. Pyridostigmine is an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor which increases effective concentrations of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction of both striated and smooth muscle cells. We conducted a prospective crossover study of five patients with dysphagia and proven esophageal dysmotility. Three patients had baseline ineffective esophageal motility and two had achalasia. Patients underwent pharyngeal and esophageal manometry before and after pyridostigmine administration. The median distal contractile integral (DCI), a marker of esophageal contractile vigor, was significantly higher post pyridostigmine administration 3001 (1950.3–3703.2) mmHg × s × cm compared to pre-pyridostigmine DCI of 1229.9 (956.2–2100) mmHg × s × cm; P < 0.001. Pre-pyridostigmine 18/25 (72%) of the patient’s swallows was peristaltic compared to 25/25 (100%) post-pyridostigmine; P < 0.005. No other pharyngeal or esophageal high-resolution manometry parameter differed significantly after pyridostigmine administration. The results of this pilot study demonstrate that pyridostigmine acutely improves esophageal contractile vigor in patients suffering from dysphagia with esophageal dysmotility. Further investigation with larger sample size, longer follow-up, side effect profile, and patient-reported outcome measures is still needed to determine the clinical usefulness of pyridostigmine in specific disorders of esophageal motility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashraf HH, Palmer J, Dalton HR, Waters C, Luff T, Strugnell M, et al. Can patients determine the level of their dysphagia? World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:1038–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Roeder BE, Murray JA, Dierkhising RA. Patient localization of esophageal dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:697–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nouraei S a. R, Murray IA, Heathcote KJ, Dalton HR. Oesophageal causes of dysphagia localised only to the pharynx: Implications for the suspected head and neck cancer pathway. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018;

  4. Gyawali CP, Sifrim D, Carlson DA, Hawn M, Katzka DA, Pandolfino JE, et al. Ineffective esophageal motility: concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019;31:e13584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jain A, Baker JR, Chen JW. In ineffective esophageal motility, failed swallows are more functionally relevant than weak swallows. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30:e13297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollenstein M, Thwaites P, Bütikofer S, Heinrich H, Sauter M, Ulmer I, et al. Pharyngeal swallowing and oesophageal motility during a solid meal test: a prospective study in healthy volunteers and patients with major motility disorders. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2:644–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho S-C, Chang C-S, Wu C-Y, Chen G-H. Ineffective esophageal motility is a primary motility disorder in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2002;47:652–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aggarwal N, Thota PN, Lopez R, Gabbard S. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover-style trial of buspirone in functional dysphagia and ineffective esophageal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mashimo H, Goyal RK. Physiology of esophageal motility. GI motility online [internet]. Berlin: Nature Publishing Group; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blonski W, Vela MF, Freeman J, Sharma N, Castell DO. The effect of oral buspirone, pyridostigmine, and bethanechol on esophageal function evaluated with combined multichannel esophageal impedance-manometry in healthy volunteers. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;43:253–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Belafsky PC, Kuhn M. The clinician’s guide to swallowing fluoroscopy [internet]. New York: Springer; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kahrilas PJ, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arffa RE, Krishna P, Gartner-Schmidt J, Rosen CA. Normative values for the voice handicap index-10. J Voice. 2012;26:462–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, Pryor JC, Postma GN, Allen J, et al. Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117:919–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Crary MA, Mann GDC, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1516–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice. 2002;16:274–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maggi L, Mantegazza R. Treatment of myasthenia gravis: focus on pyridostigmine. Clin Drug Investig. 2011;31:691–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Omari TI, Ciucci M, Gozdzikowska K, Hernández E, Hutcheson K, Jones C, et al. High-resolution pharyngeal manometry and impedance: protocols and metrics-recommendations of a high-resolution pharyngeal manometry international working group. Dysphagia. 2020;35:281–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leonard R, Rees CJ, Belafsky P, Allen J. Fluoroscopic surrogate for pharyngeal strength: the pharyngeal constriction ratio (PCR). Dysphagia. 2011;26:13–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roman S, Kahrilas PJ, Mion F, Nealis TB, Soper NJ, Poncet G, et al. Partial recovery of peristalsis after myotomy for achalasia; more the rule than the exception. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:157–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goyal RK, Chaudhury A. Physiology of normal esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;42:610–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Rourke A, Weinberger P, Morrison M, Conklin J, Postma G. Topical bethanechol for the improvement of esophageal dysmotility: a pilot study: annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology [internet]. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Drachman DB. Myasthenia gravis. Semin Neurol. 2016;36:419–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shumon I. Dhar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhar, S.I., Nativ-Zeltzer, N., Mehdizadeh, O.B. et al. Effects of Pyridostigmine on Esophageal and Pharyngeal Motility in Dysphagic Patients Undergoing High-Resolution Manometry. Dysphagia 37, 4–10 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10243-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10243-7

Keywords

Navigation