Abstract
Videofluoroscopic Swallow studies (VFSS) are useful radiological examinations to explore swallowing disorders but which require ionizing radiation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the comparability of pediatric VFSS at 15 frames per second (fps) with 30 fps. Fifty-five loops including 190 swallowings of VFSS at 30 fps performed on 32 consecutive pediatric patients in a University Hospital Center were retrospectively modified by a software to delete one image out of two to obtain secondary loops with a frame rate of 15 fps. An otorhinolaryngologist-phonatrician and a radiologist reviewed all swallowings blindly and randomly using the penetration and aspiration scale (PAS). In case of discordance, they concluded a consensual interpretation. Fifteen girls and seventeen boys were included. The median age was 4 years and 8 months (range = 4 months–16 yr.). 144 swallowings were normal. Swallowing disorder was confirmed in 46 swallowings, (23 supraglottic penetrations and 23 aspirations). Considering each swallowing at 15 fps, sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 93% (CI 0.82–0.98) and 98% (CI 0.94–0.99). The Cohen’Kappa coefficient between each interpretation at 15 and 30 fps was “almost perfect” (κ = 0.95; CI 0.88–0.99). Considering each loop, conclusion was identical. Reducing frame rate at 15 fps during pediatric VFSS seemed to be acceptable with comparable diagnostic performances without clinical impact compared to 30 fps, while being an efficient way to reduce the ionizing radiation exposition in children. We would suggest reconsidering the possibility of using VFSS with a 15 fps in a pediatric population.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- VFSS:
-
Video Fluoroscopic Swallow Study
References
Broniatowski M, Sonies BC, Rubin JS, Bradshaw CR, Spiegel JR, Bastian RW, et al. Current evaluation and treatment of patients with swallowing disorders. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 1999;120:464–73.
Arvedson JC, Lefton-Greif MA. Pediatric videofluoroscopic swallow studies: A professional manual with caregiver guidelines. San Antonio: Communication Skill Builders/Psychological Corporation; 1998.
Martin-Harris B, Logemann JA, McMahon S, Schleicher M, Sandidge J. Clinical utility of the modified barium swallow. Dysphagia. 2000;15:136–41.
Chau KHT, Kung CMA. Patient dose during videofluoroscopy swallowing studies in a Hong Kong Public Hospital. Dysphagia. 2009;24:387–90.
Kim HM, Choi KH, Kim TW. Patients’ radiation dose during videofluoroscopic swallowing studies according to underlying characteristics. Dysphagia. 2013;28:153–8.
Wright RE, Boyd CS, Workman A. Radiation doses to patients during pharyngeal videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia. 1998;13:113–5.
Zammit-Maempel I, Chapple C-L, Leslie P. Radiation dose in videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Dysphagia. 2006;22:13–5.
Flax-Goldenberg R, Kulkarni KS, Carson KA, Pinto JM, Martin-Harris B, Lefton-Greif MA. Concordance between aspiration detected on upper gastrointestinal series and videofluoroscopic swallow study in bottle-fed children. Dysphagia. 2016;31:505–10.
Weir KA, McMahon SM, Long G, Bunch JA, Pandeya N, Coakley KS, et al. Radiation doses to children during modified barium swallow studies. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:283–90.
Hersh C, Wentland C, Sally S, de Stadler M, Hardy S, Fracchia MS, et al. Radiation exposure from videofluoroscopic swallow studies in children with a type 1 laryngeal cleft and pharyngeal dysphagia: a retrospective review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;89:92–6.
Cohen MD. ALARA, image gently and CT-induced cancer. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45:465–70.
Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, McHugh K, Lee C, Kim KP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012;380:499–505.
Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, et al. Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. The BMJ. 2013;346:f2360.
Hiorns MP, Ryan MM. Current practice in paediatric videofluoroscopy. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36:911–9.
Cohen MD. Can we use pulsed fluoroscopy to decrease the radiation dose during video fluoroscopic feeding studies in children? Clin Radiol. 2009;64:70–3.
Bonilha HS, Blair J, Carnes B, Huda W, Humphries K, McGrattan K, et al. Preliminary investigation of the effect of pulse rate on judgments of swallowing impairment and treatment recommendations. Dysphagia. 2013;28:528–38.
Mulheren RW, Azola A, González-Fernández M. Do ratings of swallowing function differ by videofluoroscopic rate? An exploratory analysis in patients after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;100:1085–90.
Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. Austin: Pro ed; 1993.
Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria; 2014. https://www R-Proj Org. 2015;
Henderson M, Miles A, Holgate V, Peryman S, Allen J. Application and verification of quantitative objective videofluoroscopic swallowing measures in a pediatric population with dysphagia. J Pediatr. 2016;178(200–205):e1.
Lefton-Greif MA, McGrattan KE, Carson KA, Pinto JM, Wright JM, Martin-Harris B. First steps towards development of an instrument for the reproducible quantification of oropharyngeal swallow physiology in bottle-fed children. Dysphagia. 2018;33:76–82.
Lee JW, Randall DR, Evangelista LM, Kuhn MA, Belafsky PC. Subjective assessment of videofluoroscopic swallow studies. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 2017;156:901–5.
Bonilha HS, Huda W, Wilmskoetter J, Martin-Harris B, Tipnis SV. Radiation risks to adult patients undergoing modified barium swallow studies. Dysphagia. 2019;1:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-09993-w.
Aufrichtig R, Xue P, Thomas CW, Gilmore GC, Wilson DL. Perceptual comparison of pulsed and continuous fluoroscopy. Med Phys. 1994;21:245–56.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mr John Sheath for English language assistance and their friendly support; Mr Simon Courvoisier and Mr Simon Filachet, from Siemens Healthineer, for the conception of the software.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Approval from the Institutional research ethics board was obtained (RNI 2018 092). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Layly, J., Marmouset, F., Chassagnon, G. et al. Can We Reduce Frame Rate to 15 Images per Second in Pediatric Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies?. Dysphagia 35, 296–300 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10027-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10027-8