Skip to main content
Log in

Swallowing Function and Kinematics in Stroke Patients with Tracheostomies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the swallowing function and kinematics in stroke patients with and without tracheostomies. In this retrospective matched case–control study, we compared stroke patients with (TRACH group, n = 24) and without (NO-TRACH group, n = 24) tracheostomies. Patients were matched for age, sex, and stroke-type. Swallowing function was evaluated using the videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (VDS) and functional oral intake scale (FOIS) obtained from videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) images. Swallowing kinematics were evaluated using a two-dimensional kinematic analysis of the VFSS images. Mean duration of tracheostomy was 132.38 ± 150.46 days in the TRACH group. There was no significant difference in the total VDS score between the TRACH (35.17 ± 15.30) and NO-TRACH groups (29.25 ± 16.66, p = 0.247). FOIS was significantly lower in the TRACH group (2.33 ± 1.40) than in the NO-TRACH group (4.33 ± 1.79, p = 0.001). The TRACH group had a significantly lower maximum vertical displacement (15.23 ± 7.39 mm, p = 0.011) and velocity (54.99 ± 29.59 mm/s, p = 0.011), and two-dimensional velocity (61.07 ± 24.89 mm/s, p = 0.013) of the larynx than the NO-TRACH group (20.18 ± 5.70 mm, 82.23 ± 37.30 mm/s, and 84.40 ± 36.05 mm/s, respectively). Maximum horizontal velocity of the hyoid bone in the TRACH group (36.77 ± 16.97 mm/s) was also significantly lower than that in the NO-TRACH group (47.49 ± 15.73 mm/s, p = 0.032). This study demonstrated that stroke patients with tracheostomies had inferior swallowing function and kinematics than those without tracheostomies. A prospective longitudinal study is needed to elucidate the effect of a tracheostomy on swallowing recovery in stroke patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roth EJ, Lovell L, Harvey RL, Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Stroke rehabilitation: indwelling urinary catheters, enteral feeding tubes, and tracheostomies are associated with resource use and functional outcomes. Stroke. 2002;33:1845–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walcott BP, Kamel H, Castro B, Kimberly WT, Sheth KN. Tracheostomy after severe ischemic stroke: a population-based study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:1024–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hess DR, Altobelli NP. Tracheostomy tubes. Respir Care. 2014;59:956–71 discussion 971-953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bosel J. Tracheostomy in stroke patients. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014;16:274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeVita MA, Spierer-Rundback L. Swallowing disorders in patients with prolonged orotracheal intubation or tracheostomy tubes. Crit Care Med. 1990;18:1328–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nash M. Swallowing problems in the tracheotomized patient. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 1988;21:701–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cameron JL, Reynolds J, Zuidema GD. Aspiration in patients with tracheostomies. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973;136:68–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muz J, Mathog RH, Nelson R, Jones LA Jr. Aspiration in patients with head and neck cancer and tracheostomy. Am J Otolaryngol. 1989;10:282–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Elpern EH, Scott MG, Petro L, Ries MH. Pulmonary aspiration in mechanically ventilated patients with tracheostomies. Chest. 1994;105:563–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman SA, Deal CW, Urquhart W. Disturbance of swallowing after tracheostomy. Lancet. 1966;1:954–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonanno PC. Swallowing dysfunction after tracheostomy. Ann Surg. 1971;174:29–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Eibling DE, Gross RD. Subglottic air pressure: a key component of swallowing efficiency. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105:253–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarett M, Andreu MF, Salvati IG, Donnianni MC, Montes GS, Rodriguez MG. Effect of subglottic air insufflation on subglottic pressure during swallowing. Med Intensiva. 2014;38:133–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Donzelli J, Brady S, Wesling M, Theisen M. Effects of the removal of the tracheotomy tube on swallowing during the fiberoptic endoscopic exam of the swallow (FEES). Dysphagia. 2005;20:283–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Leder SB, Ross DA. Confirmation of no causal relationship between tracheotomy and aspiration status: a direct replication study. Dysphagia. 2010;25:35–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Terk AR, Leder SB, Burrell MI. Hyoid bone and laryngeal movement dependent upon presence of a tracheotomy tube. Dysphagia. 2007;22:89–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang JY, Choi KH, Yun GJ, Kim MY, Ryu JS. Does removal of tracheostomy affect dysphagia? A kinematic analysis. Dysphagia. 2012;27:498–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prigent H, Lejaille M, Terzi N, Annane D, Figere M, Orlikowski D, Lofaso F. Effect of a tracheostomy speaking valve on breathing-swallowing interaction. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38:85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amathieu R, Sauvat S, Reynaud P, Slavov V, Luis D, Dinca A, Tual L, Bloc S, Dhonneur G. Influence of the cuff pressure on the swallowing reflex in tracheostomized intensive care unit patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109:578–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, Diamant N, Speechley M, Teasell R. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36:2756–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smithard DG, O’Neill PA, England RE, Park CL, Wyatt R, Martin DF, Morris J. The natural history of dysphagia following a stroke. Dysphagia. 1997;12:188–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing function after stroke: prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke. 1999;30:744–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Han TR, Paik NJ, Park JW, Kwon BS. The prediction of persistent dysphagia beyond six months after stroke. Dysphagia. 2008;23:59–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Crary MA, Mann GD, Groher ME. Initial psychometric assessment of a functional oral intake scale for dysphagia in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1516–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Seo HG, Oh BM, Han TR. Longitudinal changes of the swallowing process in subacute stroke patients with aspiration. Dysphagia. 2011;26:41–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Paik NJ, Kim SJ, Lee HJ, Jeon JY, Lim JY, Han TR. Movement of the hyoid bone and the epiglottis during swallowing in patients with dysphagia from different etiologies. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18:329–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SH, Oh BM, Chun SM, Lee JC, Min Y, Bang SH, Kim HC, Han TR. The accuracy of the swallowing kinematic analysis at various movement velocities of the hyoid and epiglottis. Ann Rehabil Med. 2013;37:320–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pearce N. Analysis of matched case–control studies. BMJ. 2016;352:i969.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Conway A, Rolley JX, Fulbrook P, Page K, Thompson DR. Improving statistical analysis of matched case–control studies. Res Nurs Health. 2013;36:320–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldsmith T. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders following endotracheal intubation and tracheostomy. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2000;38:219–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shaker R, Milbrath M, Ren J, Campbell B, Toohill R, Hogan W. Deglutitive aspiration in patients with tracheostomy: effect of tracheostomy on the duration of vocal cord closure. Gastroenterology. 1995;108:1357–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ding R, Logemann JA. Swallow physiology in patients with trach cuff inflated or deflated: a retrospective study. Head Neck. 2005;27:809–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Matsuo K, Palmer JB. Anatomy and physiology of feeding and swallowing: normal and abnormal. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008;19:691–707.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Seo HG, Oh BM, Han TR. Swallowing kinematics and factors associated with laryngeal penetration and aspiration in stroke survivors with dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2016;31:160–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nagy A, Molfenter SM, Peladeau-Pigeon M, Stokely S, Steele CM. The effect of bolus consistency on hyoid velocity in healthy swallowing. Dysphagia. 2015;30:445–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Martin-Harris B. Coordination of respiration and swallowing. GI Motility online, 2006. doi: 10.1038/gimo10.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung-Mo Oh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seo, H.G., Kim, JG., Nam, H.S. et al. Swallowing Function and Kinematics in Stroke Patients with Tracheostomies. Dysphagia 32, 393–400 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9767-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9767-x

Keywords

Navigation