Skip to main content
Log in

The Normative Range for and Age and Gender Effects on the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) is a validated measure of the symptomatic severity of oral–pharyngeal dysphagia. Up until now no normative ranges have been established for the questionnaire. This is a limitation in its utility as it makes it difficult to use the tool to identify the prevalence and burden of oral–pharyngeal dysphagia in the general population or within patient populations. The study’s aim was to derive the normative range of dysphagia scores for the SSQ and to determine whether, in nondysphagic individuals, there are any age or gender effects on these scores. The questionnaire was administered to 73 eligible nondysphagic individuals who had been screened for any dysphagia or conditions that might predispose them to dysphagia. The frequency distribution of SSQ scores was first examined for normality and appropriate transformations performed before determining the upper limit of normal. Of the 73 healthy participants, 45 were male, and the cohort had a mean age of 58.6 years (range = 22.0–82.1 years). No statistically significant relationship between SSQ scores and either age (r s[73] = 0.140, p = 0.239) or gender (r pb[73] = 0.021, p = 0.857) was found. The mean total SSQ score (maximum possible score = 1,700) was 59.0 (SD = 56.7; range = 2–241). The frequency distribution of scores was non-normal and markedly skewed. After a Box–Cox transformation to normalise the distribution, the calculated upper limit of the reference interval was 234 with a 90 % CI of [193, 277]. The SSQ scores in a nondysphagic population are not influenced by age or gender. These data complement the existing reliability and validation data and thereby improve the overall utility of the SSQ in the context of future studies of oral–pharyngeal dysphagia prevalence, efficacy, and outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook IJ, Kahrilas PJ. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on management of oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 1999;116:455–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook IJ. Oropharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2009;38:411–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook IJ. Diagnostic evaluation of dysphagia. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;5:393–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wallace KL, Middleton S, Cook IJ. Development and validation of a self-report symptom inventory to assess the severity of oral-pharyngeal dysphagia. Gastroenterology. 2000;118:678–87.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Horn PS, Pesce AJ, Copeland BE. A robust approach to reference interval estimation and evaluation. Clin Chem. 1998;44:622–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Geffre A, Concordet D, Braun JP, Trumel C. Reference Value Advisor: a new freeware set of macroinstructions to calculate reference intervals with Microsoft Excel. Vet Clin Pathol. 2011;40:107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Association for Clinical Chemistry; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Guideline for defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; proposed guideline. 3rd ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Masoro E. Biology of aging. Arch Int Med. 1987;147:166–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Teismann IK, Steinstraeter O, Schwindt W, Ringelstein EB, Pantev C, Dziewas R. Age-related changes in cortical swallowing processing. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(6):1044–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaker R, Ren J, Zamir Z, Sarna A, Liu J, Sui Z. Effect of aging, position, and temperature on the threshold volume triggering pharyngeal swallows. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:396–402.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aviv JE, Martin JH, Jones ME, Wee TA, Diamond B, Keen MS, Blitzer A. Age-related changes in pharyngeal and supraglottic sensation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994;103:749–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook IJ, Weltman MD, Wallace K, Shaw DW, McKay E, Smart RC, Butler SP. Influence of aging on oral–pharyngeal bolus transit and clearance during swallowing: a scintigraphic study. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:G972–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tracy JF, Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ, Jacob P, Kobara M, Krugler C. Preliminary observations on the effects of age on oropharyngeal deglutition. Dysphagia. 1989;4:90–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sonies BC, Stone M, Shawker T. Speech and swallowing in the elderly. Gerodontology. 1984;3:115–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sonies BC, Parent LJ, Morrish K, Baum BJ. Durational aspects of the oral–pharyngeal phase of swallow in normal adults. Dysphagia. 1988;3:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Holland G, Jayasekeran V, Pendleton N, Horan M, Jones M, Hamdy S. Prevalence and symptom profiling of oropharyngeal dysphagia in a community dwelling of an elderly population: a self-reporting questionnaire survey. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24:476–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bloem B, Lagaay A, van Beek W, Haan J, Roos R, Wintzen A. Prevalence of subjective dysphagia in community residents aged over 87. BMJ. 1990;300:721–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Marcin Szczesniak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szczesniak, M.M., Maclean, J., Zhang, T. et al. The Normative Range for and Age and Gender Effects on the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ). Dysphagia 29, 535–538 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9541-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-014-9541-x

Keywords

Navigation