Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Topical Nasal Anesthetic on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing with Sensory Testing (FEESST)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objections to the use of topical nasal anesthesia (TNA) during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) with sensory testing (FEESST) have been raised, primarily because of the possibility of desensitizing the pharyngeal and laryngeal mucosa and affecting both the sensory and motor aspects of the swallow. Furthermore, it has been suggested that TNA is not necessary during FEES as it does not improve patient comfort or make the procedure easier for the endoscopist. The purpose of this double-blind, randomized, controlled, crossover clinical trial was to determine how gel TNA during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing affects sensation, swallowing, and comfort rating scores in healthy nondysphagic participants. Laryngopharyngeal sensory thresholds and swallowing durations were compared between two conditions: TNA and sham. Transition duration decreased statistically significantly during the TNA condition compared to the sham for 10 ml only (p < 0.05). All other swallowing measures did not change between the conditions. Laryngopharyngeal sensory thresholds and perceptions did not change between conditions. No change was observed for subject comfort scores, ease of exam, or quality of view. Future studies should evaluate TNA administration variables, including concentration, dosage amount, and method of application, to determine the optimal strategy for providing comfort while avoiding altered swallowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dodds WJ, Logemann JA, Stewart ET. Radiologic assessment of abnormal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154(5):965–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Logemann JA. Manual for the videofluorographic study of swallowing. 2nd ed. Austin: Pro-Ed; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2(4):216–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bastian RW. The videoendoscopic swallowing study: an alternative and partner to the videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Dysphagia. 1993;8(4):359–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bastian RW. Videoendoscopic evaluation of patients with dysphagia: an adjunct to the modified barium swallow. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;104(3):339–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosevear WH, Hamlet SL. Flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy used to assess swallowing function. Ear Nose Throat J. 1991;70(8):498–500.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leder SB. Serial fiberoptic endoscopic swallowing evaluations in the management of patients with dysphagia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(10):1264–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leder SB, Novella S, Patwa H. Use of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Dysphagia. 2004;19(3):177–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suiter DM, Moorhead MK. Effects of flexible fiberoptic endoscopy on pharyngeal swallow physiology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(6):956–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Colodny N. Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) using the penetration-aspiration scale: a replication study. Dysphagia. 2002;17(4):308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11(2):93–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aviv JE, Martin JH, Keen MS, Debell M, Blitzer A. Air pulse quantification of supraglottic and pharyngeal sensation: a new technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993;102(10):777–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aviv JE, Sacco RL, Thomson J, et al. Silent laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits after stroke. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1997;106(2):87–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhabu P, Poletto C, Mann E, Bielamowicz S, Ludlow CL. Thyroarytenoid muscle responses to air pressure stimulation of the laryngeal mucosa in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(10):834–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Murakami Y, Kirchner JA. Mechanical and physiological properties of reflex laryngeal closure. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1972;81(1):59–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aviv JE, Kim T, Thomson JE, Sunshine S, Kaplan S, Close LG. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) in healthy controls. Dysphagia. 1998;13(2):87–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. ASHA Special Interest Division 13. Swallowing and swallowing disorders (dysphagia) committee on endoscopic evaluation of swallowing guidelines. Role of the speech-language pathologist in the performance and interpretation of endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: guidelines. 2004. http://www.asha.org/policy/GL2004-00059.htm. Accessed 13 Jan 2012.

  18. Langmore SE. Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 1st ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frosh AC, Jayaraj S, Porter G, Almeyda J. Is local anaesthesia actually beneficial in flexible fibreoptic nasendoscopy? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998;23(3):259–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leder SB, Ross DA, Briskin KB, Sasaki CT. A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of a topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40(6):1352–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ogura JH, Lam RL. Anatomical and physiological correlations on stimulating the human superior laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope. 1953;63(10):947–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Doty RW, Bosma JF. An electromyographic analysis of reflex deglutition. J Neurophysiol. 1956;19(1):44–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iscoe S, Feldman JL, Cohen MI. Properties of inspiratory termination by superior laryngeal and vagal stimulation. Respir Physiol. 1979;36(3):353–66 [abstract].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ertekin C, Kiylioglu N, Tarlaci S, Keskin A, Aydogdu I. Effect of mucosal anaesthesia on oropharyngeal swallowing. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2000;12(6):567–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jafari S, Prince RA, Kim DY, Paydarfar D. Sensory regulation of swallowing and airway protection: a role for the internal superior laryngeal nerve in humans. J Physiol. 2003;550(1):287–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Local anesthetics. In: McCoy GK, Snow EK, Kester L, et al., editors. American hospital formulary service drug information 2010. Bethesda: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2010. p. 3297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bonaparte JP, Javidnia H, Kilty S. A double-blind randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of topical lidocaine in extended flexible endoscopic nasal examinations. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011;36(6):550–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Butler S, Lester S, Langmore S, Lintzenich C, Wright S. Effects of topical nasal anesthetic on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. 20th annual meeting of the dysphagia research society meeting, Toronto, ON, Canada, 8–10 Mar 2012.

  29. Cain AJ, Murray DP, McClymont LG. The use of topical nasal anaesthesia before flexible nasendoscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing cophenylcaine with placebo. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002;27(6):485–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Georgalas C, Sandhu G, Frosh A, Xenellis J. Cophenylcaine spray versus placebo in flexible nasendoscopy: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2005;59(2):130–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnson PE, Belafsky PC, Postma GN. Topical nasal anesthesia and laryngopharyngeal sensory testing: a prospective, double-blind crossover study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(1):14–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson PE, Belafsky PC, Postma GN. Topical nasal anesthesia for transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, cross-over study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;128(4):452–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sadek SA, De R, Scott A, White AP, Wilson PS, Carlin WV. The efficacy of topical anaesthesia in flexible nasendoscopy: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2001;26(1):25–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Singh V, Brockbank MJ, Todd GB. Flexible transnasal endoscopy: is local anaesthetic necessary? J Laryngol Otol. 1997;111(7):616–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pothier DD, Awad Z, Whitehouse M, Porter GC. The use of lubrication in flexible fibreoptic nasendoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30(4):353–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pothier DD, Raghava N, Monteiro P, Awad Z. A randomized controlled trial: is water better than a standard lubricant in nasendoscopy? Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31(2):134–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Amin MR, Postma GN. Office evaluation of swallowing. Ear Nose Throat J. 2004;83(7 Suppl 2):13–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Aviv JE, Murry T. FEESST safety. In: FEESST: flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing. San Diego: Plural Publishing, Inc.; 2005. pp 87–96.

  39. Aviv JE, Martin JH, Kim T, et al. Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing and the laryngeal adductor reflex. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108(8):725–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Stephen SS. Psychophysics: introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. 2nd ed. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Prather RW. Connecting neural coding to number cognition: a computational account. Dev Sci. 2012;15(4):589–600.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14(7):798–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Almeida RCA, Haguette RCB, Andrade ISN. Swallowing with and without verbal commands: videofluoroscopic findings. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;16(3):291–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Butler SG, Stuart A, Kemp S. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in healthy young and older adults. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009;118(2):99–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bartoshuk LM, Fast K, Snyder DJ. Differences in our sensory worlds. Curr Direct Psychol Sci. 2005;14(3):122–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rees CJ. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;14(6):425–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dziadziola J, Hamlet S, Michou G, Jones L. Multiple swallows and piecemeal deglutition: observations from normal adults and patients with head and neck cancer. Dysphagia. 1992;7(1):8–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dua KS, Ren J, Bardan E, Xie P, Shaker R. Coordination of deglutitive glottal function and pharyngeal bolus transit during normal eating. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(1):73–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kim Y, McCullough GH, Asp CW. Temporal measurements of pharyngeal swallowing in normal populations. Dysphagia. 2005;20(4):290–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tracy JF, Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ, Jacob P, Kobara M, Krugler C. Preliminary observations on the effects of age on oropharyngeal deglutition. Dysphagia. 1989;4(2):90–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mansson I, Sandberg N. Effects of surface anesthesia on deglutition in man. Laryngoscope. 1974;84(3):427–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Aviv JE, Murry T, Zschommler A, Cohen M, Gartner C. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing: patient characteristics and analysis of safety in 1,340 consecutive examinations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114(3):173–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in whole by NIH/NINDS R21 HD055677 and in part by NICHHD HD055269, NCRR RR20146, DC011824, GM103425, and UL1TR000039.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin E. Kamarunas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kamarunas, E.E., McCullough, G.H., Guidry, T.J. et al. Effects of Topical Nasal Anesthetic on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing with Sensory Testing (FEESST). Dysphagia 29, 33–43 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9473-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-013-9473-x

Keywords

Navigation