Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Silent Aspiration Risk is Volume-dependent

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 June 2011

Abstract

Clinical swallow protocols cannot detect silent aspiration due to absence of overt behavioral signs, but screening with a much larger bolus volume, i.e., 90 cc vs. 1–10 cc, may elicit a reflexive cough in individuals who might otherwise exhibit silent aspiration. A swallow screen that maintains high sensitivity to identify aspiration risk while simultaneously reducing the false-negative rate for silent aspiration would be beneficial. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether silent aspiration risk was volume-dependent by using a 3-oz. (90-cc) water swallow challenge to elicit a reflexive cough when silent aspiration occurred on smaller bolus volumes. A prospective, consecutive, referral-based sample of 4102 inpatients from the acute-care setting of a large urban tertiary-care teaching hospital participated. Silent aspiration was determined first by fiberoptic endoscopy and then each participant was instructed to drink 3 oz. of water completely and without interruption. Criteria for challenge failure were inability to drink the entire amount, stopping and starting, or coughing and choking during or immediately after completion. Improved identification of aspiration risk status occurred for 58% of participants who exhibited silent aspiration on smaller volumes, i.e., an additional 48% of liquid silent aspirators and 65.6% of puree silent aspirators coughed when attempting the 3-oz. water swallow challenge. A low false-negative rate was observed for the entire population sample, i.e., ≤2.0%. A combined false-negative rate for participants who silently aspirated was 6.9%, i.e., 7.8% if silently aspirated liquid and 6.1% if silently aspirated puree consistency. Determination of silent aspiration risk was shown to be volume-dependent, with a larger volume eliciting a reflexive cough in individuals who previously silently aspirated on smaller volumes. A 3-oz. water swallow challenge’s previously reported high sensitivity for identification of aspiration risk combined with the newly reported low false-negative rate mitigates the issue of silent aspiration risk during clinical swallow screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramsey D, Smithard D, Kalra L. Silent aspiration: what do we know? Dysphagia. 2005;20:218–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Linden P, Siebens AA. Dysphagia: predicting laryngeal penetration. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:281–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Linden P, Kuhlemeier KV, Patterson C. The probability of correctly predicting subglottic penetration from clinical observations. Dysphagia. 1993;8:170–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leder SB, Sasaki CT, Burrell MI. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of dysphagia to identify silent aspiration. Dysphagia. 1998;13:19–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arvedson J, Rogers B, Buck G, Smart P, Msall M. Silent aspiration prominent in children with dysphagia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1994;28:173–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Horner J, Massey EW. Silent aspiration following stroke. Neurology. 1988;38:317–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holas MA, DePippo KL, Reding MJ. Aspiration and relative risk of medical complications following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:1051–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leder SB, Espinosa JF. Aspiration risk after acute stroke: comparison of clinical examination and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Dysphagia. 2002;17:214–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garon BR, Engle M, Ormiston C. Silent aspiration: results of 1,000 videofluoroscopic swallow evaluations. J Neurol Rehabil. 1996;10:121–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Smith CH, Logemann JA, Colangelo LA, Rademaker AW, Pauloski BR. Incidence and patient characteristics associated with silent aspiration in the acute care setting. Dysphagia. 1999;14:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Elpern EH, Scott MG, Petro L, Ries MH. Pulmonary aspiration in mechanically ventilated patients with tracheostomies. Chest. 1994;105:563–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leder SB. Incidence and type of aspiration in acute care patients requiring mechanical ventilation via a new tracheotomy. Chest. 2002;122:1721–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Horner J, Massey EW, Riski JE, Lathrop DL, Chase KN. Aspiration following stroke: clinical correlates and outcome. Neurology. 1988;38:1359–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Splaingard ML, Hutchins B, Sulton LD, Chaudhuri G. Aspiration in rehabilitation patients: videofluoroscopy vs bedside clinical assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:637–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kidd D, Lawson J, Nesbitt R, MacMahon J. Aspiration in acute stroke: a clinical study with videofluoroscopy. Q J Med. 1993;86:825–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wakasugi Y, Tohara H, Hattori F, Motohashi Y, Nakane A, Goto S, Ouchi Y, Mikushi S, Takeuchi S, Uematsu H. Screening test for silent aspiration at the bedside. Dysphagia. 2008;23:364–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Butler SG, Stuart A, Markley L, Rees C. Penetration and aspiration in healthy older adults as assessed during endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009;118:190–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McCullough GH, Rosenbek JC, Wertz RT, Suiter D, McCoy SC. Defining swallowing function by age: promises and pitfalls of pigeonholing. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2007;23:290–307.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Widdecombe JG. Sensory innervation of the lungs and airways. In: Cervero F, Morrison JFB, editors. Progress in brain research. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1986. p. 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Canning BJ, Mazzone SB, Meeker SN, Mori N, Reynolds SM, Undem BJ. Identification of the tracheal and laryngeal afferent neurones mediating cough in anaesthetized guinea-pigs. J Physiol. 2004;557:543–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McAlexander MA, Myers AC, Undem BJ. Adaptation of guinea-pig vagal airway afferent neurones to mechanical stimulation. J Physiol. 1999;521(Pt 1):239–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor-Clark T, Undem BJ. Transduction mechanisms in airway sensory nerves. J Appl Physiol. 2006;101:950–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sant’Ambrogio FB, Anderson JW, Sant’Ambrogio G. Effect of 1-menthol on laryngeal receptors. J Appl Physiol. 1991;70:788–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sant’Ambrogio G, Mathew OP, Sant’Ambrogio FB, Fisher JT. Laryngeal cold receptors. Respir Physiol. 1985;59:35–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsubone H, Sant’Ambrogio G, Anderson JW, Orani GP. Laryngeal afferent activity and reflexes in the guinea pig. Respir Physiol. 1991;86:215–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sant’Ambrogio FB, Anderson JW, Sant’Ambrogio G, Mathew OP. Response of laryngeal receptors to water solutions of different osmolality and ionic composition. Respir Med. 1991;85(Suppl A):57–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Suiter DM, Leder SB. Clinical utility of the 3-ounce water swallow test. Dysphagia. 2008;23:244–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Murguia M, Corey DM, Daniels SK. Comparison of sequential swallowing in patients with acute stroke and healthy adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1860–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Murray J, Langmore SE, Ginsberg S, Dostie A. The significance of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions and swallowing frequency in predicting aspiration. Dysphagia. 1996;11:99–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olson N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: a new procedure. Dysphagia. 1988;2:216–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olson N. Endoscopic and videofluoroscopic evaluations of swallowing and aspiration. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1991;100:678–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Leder SB, Ross DA, Briskin KB, Sasaki CT. A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40:1352–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Daniels SK, Schroeder MF, DeGeorge PC, Corey D, Rosenbek JC. Effects of verbal cue on bolus flow during swallowing. J Am Speech Lang Pathol. 2007;16:140–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Leder SB, Acton LA, Lisitano HL, Murray JT. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) with and without blue dyed food. Dysphagia. 2005;20:157–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kelly AM, Leslie P, Beale T, Payten C, Drinnan MJ. Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal severity? Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31:425–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1723–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Daniels SK, Corey DM, Hadskey LD, Legendre C, Priestly DH, Rosenbek JC, Foundas AL. Mechanism of sequential swallowing during straw drinking in healthy young and older adults. J Speech Hear Lang Res. 2003;47:33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ozaki K, Kagaya H, Yokoyama M, Saitoh E, Okada S, Gonzales-Fernandez M, Palmer JB, Uematsu H. The risk of penetration and aspiration during videofluoroscopic examination of swallowing varies depending on food types. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2010;220:41–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Riccio MM, Kummer W, Bigliari B, Myers B, Undem BJ. Interganglionic segregation of distinct vagal afferent fibre phenotypes in guinea-pig isolated airway. J Physiol. 1996;496:521–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Verillo RT. Effect of spatial parameters on the vibrotactile threshold. J Exp Psychol. 1966;71:570–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Green BG, Craig JC. Roles of vibration amplitude and static force in vibrotactile spatial summation. Percept Psychophys. 1974;16:503–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gescheider GA, Guclu B, Sexton JL, Karalunas S, Fontana A. Spatial summation in the tactile sensory system: probability summation and neural integration. Somatosens Mot Res. 2005;22:255–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stevens JC, Marks LE. Spatial summation of cold. Physiol Behav. 1979;22:541–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Green BG, Zaharchuk R. Spatial variation in sensitivity as a factor in measurements of spatial summation of warmth and cold. Somatosens Mot Res. 2001;18:181–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Nguyen NP, Moltz CC, Frank C, Vos P, Smith HJ, Nguyen PD, Nguyen LM, Dutta S, Lemanski C, Sallah S. Impact of swallowing therapy on aspiration rate following treatment for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2007;43:352–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Link DT, Willging JP, Miller CK, Cotton RT, Rudolph CD. Pediatric laryngopharyngeal sensory testing during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing: feasible and correlative. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109:899–905.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Donzelli J, Brady S, Wesling M, Craney M. Predictive value of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions for aspiration during video nasal endoscopic evaluation of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112:469–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lazarus CL. Effects of chemoradiotherapy on voice and swallowing. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;17:172–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Leder SB, Ross DA. Investigation of the causal relationship between tracheotomy and aspiration in the acute care setting. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:641–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Leder SB, Ross DA. Confirmation of no causal relationship between tracheotomy and aspiration status: a direct replication study. Dysphagia. 2010;25:35–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 208041, New Haven, CT, 06520-8041, USA

    Steven B. Leder & Barry G. Green

  2. Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis, TN, 38104, USA

    Debra M. Suiter

  3. The John B. Pierce Laboratory, New Haven, CT, USA

    Barry G. Green

Authors
  1. Steven B. Leder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Debra M. Suiter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barry G. Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven B. Leder.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9349-x

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leder, S.B., Suiter, D.M. & Green, B.G. Silent Aspiration Risk is Volume-dependent. Dysphagia 26, 304–309 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-010-9312-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-010-9312-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation