Skip to main content
Log in

The Compatibility of Binary Characters on Phylogenetic Networks: Complexity and Parameterized Algorithms

  • Published:
Algorithmica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent article, Nakhleh, Ringe and Warnow introduced perfect phylogenetic networks—a model of language evolution where languages do not evolve via clean speciation—and formulated a set of problems for their accurate reconstruction. Their new methodology assumes networks, rather than trees, as the correct model to capture the evolutionary history of natural languages. They proved the NP-hardness of the problem of testing whether a network is a perfect phylogenetic one for characters exhibiting at least three states, leaving open the case of binary characters, and gave a straightforward brute-force parameterized algorithm for the problem of running time O(3k n), where k is the number of bidirectional edges in the network and n is its size. In this paper, we first establish the NP-hardness of the binary case of the problem. Then we provide a more efficient parameterized algorithm for this case running in time O(2k n 2). The presented algorithm is very simple, and utilizes some structural results and elegant operations developed in this paper that can be useful on their own in the design of heuristic algorithms for the problem. The analysis phase of the algorithm is very elegant using amortized techniques to show that the upper bound on the running time of the algorithm is much tighter than the upper bound obtained under a conservative worst-case scenario assumption. Our results bear significant impact on reconstructing evolutionary histories of languages—particularly from phonological and morphological character data, most of which exhibit at most two states (i.e., are binary), as well as on the design and analysis of parameterized algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bodlaender, H., Fellows, M., Warnow, T.: Two strikes against perfect phylogeny. In: Proceedings of ICALP’92. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 273–283. Springer, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, J., Kanj, I., Xia, G.: Labeled search trees and amortized analysis: improved upper bounds for NP-hard problems. In: ISAAC’03. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2906, pp. 148–157. Springer, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dobson, A.J.: Unrooted trees for numerical taxonomy. Unpublished manuscript

  4. Dobson, A.J.: Lexicostatistical grouping. Anthr. Linguist. 11, 216–221 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Downey, R., Fellows, M.: Parameterized Complexity. Springer, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Felsenstein, J.: Numerical methods for inferring evolutionary trees. Q. Rev. Biol. 57, 379–404 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gleason, H.A.: Counting and calculating for historical reconstruction. Anthr. Linguist. 1, 22–32 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gray, R.D., Atkinson, Q.D.: Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426(6965), 435–439 (2003), November

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Labov, W.: Principles of Language Change, vol. 1: Internal Factors. Blackwell, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nakhleh, L.: Phylogenetic networks. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas at Austin (2004)

  11. Nakhleh, L., Ringe, D., Warnow, T.: Perfect phylogenetic networks: a new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81(2), 382–420 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ringe, D., Warnow, T., Taylor, A.: Indo-European and computational cladistics. Trans. Philol. Soc. 100(1), 59–129 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ringe, D., Warnow, T., Taylor, A., Michailov, A., Levison, L.: Computational cladistics and the position of Tocharian. In: Mair, V. (ed.) The Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Peoples of Eastern Central Asia, pp. 391–414 (1998)

  14. Ross, M.: Social networks and kinds of speech-community events. In: Blench, R., Spriggs, M. (eds.) Archaeology and Language I: Theoretical and Methodological Orientations, pp. 209–261. Routledge, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, A., Warnow, T., Ringe, D.: Character-based reconstruction of a linguistic cladogram. In: Smith, J.C., Bentley, D. (eds.) Historical Linguistics 1995, Volume I: General Issues and Non-Germanic Languages, pp. 393–408. Benjamins, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Warnow, T.: Mathematical approaches to comparative linguistics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94, 6585–6590 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Warnow, T., Ringe, D., Taylor, A.: Reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Technical Report 95-16, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, Univ. of Pennsylvania (1995)

  18. Warnow, T., Ringe, D., Taylor, A.: Reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. In: ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pp. 314–322 (1996)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iyad A. Kanj.

Additional information

Research of I.A. Kanj was supported in part by DePaul University Competitive Research Grant.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kanj, I.A., Nakhleh, L. & Xia, G. The Compatibility of Binary Characters on Phylogenetic Networks: Complexity and Parameterized Algorithms. Algorithmica 51, 99–128 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-007-9046-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-007-9046-1

Keywords

Navigation